Cargando…

Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials

This study investigated the colorimetric properties of different veneering materials on core materials. Standardized specimens (10 mm × 10 mm × 1.5 mm) reflecting four core (polyetheretherketone (PEEK), zirconia (ZrO(2)), cobalt–chromium–molybdenum alloy (CoCrMo), and titanium oxide (TiO(2)); thickn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stawarczyk, Bogna, Schmid, Philipp, Roos, Malgorzata, Eichberger, Marlis, Schmidlin, Patrick R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5456785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28773612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9060491
_version_ 1783241378007875584
author Stawarczyk, Bogna
Schmid, Philipp
Roos, Malgorzata
Eichberger, Marlis
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
author_facet Stawarczyk, Bogna
Schmid, Philipp
Roos, Malgorzata
Eichberger, Marlis
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
author_sort Stawarczyk, Bogna
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the colorimetric properties of different veneering materials on core materials. Standardized specimens (10 mm × 10 mm × 1.5 mm) reflecting four core (polyetheretherketone (PEEK), zirconia (ZrO(2)), cobalt–chromium–molybdenum alloy (CoCrMo), and titanium oxide (TiO(2)); thickness: 1.5 mm) and veneering materials (VITA Mark II, IPS e.max CAD, LAVA Ultimate and VITA Enamic, all in shade A3; thickness: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2 mm, respectively) were fabricated. Specimens were superimposed to assemblies, and the color was determined with a spectrophotometer (CieLab-System) or a chair-side color measurement device (VITA EasyShade), respectively. Data were analyzed using three-, two-, and one-way ANOVA, a Chi(2)-test, and a Wilson approach (p < 0.05). The measurements with EasyShade showed A2 for VITA Mark II, A3.5 for VITA Enamic, B2 for LAVA Ultimate, and B3 for IPS e.max CAD. LabE-values showed significant differences between the tested veneering materials (p < 0.001). CieLab-System and VITA EasyShade parameters of the different assemblies showed a significant impact of core (p < 0.001), veneering material (p < 0.001), and thickness of the veneering material (p < 0.001). PEEK as core material showed comparable outcomes as compared to ZrO(2) and CoCrMo, with respect to CieLab-System parameters for each veneering material. The relative frequency of the measured VITA EasyShade parameters regarding PEEK cores also showed comparable results as compared to the gold standard CoCrMo, regardless of the veneering material used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5456785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54567852017-07-28 Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials Stawarczyk, Bogna Schmid, Philipp Roos, Malgorzata Eichberger, Marlis Schmidlin, Patrick R. Materials (Basel) Article This study investigated the colorimetric properties of different veneering materials on core materials. Standardized specimens (10 mm × 10 mm × 1.5 mm) reflecting four core (polyetheretherketone (PEEK), zirconia (ZrO(2)), cobalt–chromium–molybdenum alloy (CoCrMo), and titanium oxide (TiO(2)); thickness: 1.5 mm) and veneering materials (VITA Mark II, IPS e.max CAD, LAVA Ultimate and VITA Enamic, all in shade A3; thickness: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2 mm, respectively) were fabricated. Specimens were superimposed to assemblies, and the color was determined with a spectrophotometer (CieLab-System) or a chair-side color measurement device (VITA EasyShade), respectively. Data were analyzed using three-, two-, and one-way ANOVA, a Chi(2)-test, and a Wilson approach (p < 0.05). The measurements with EasyShade showed A2 for VITA Mark II, A3.5 for VITA Enamic, B2 for LAVA Ultimate, and B3 for IPS e.max CAD. LabE-values showed significant differences between the tested veneering materials (p < 0.001). CieLab-System and VITA EasyShade parameters of the different assemblies showed a significant impact of core (p < 0.001), veneering material (p < 0.001), and thickness of the veneering material (p < 0.001). PEEK as core material showed comparable outcomes as compared to ZrO(2) and CoCrMo, with respect to CieLab-System parameters for each veneering material. The relative frequency of the measured VITA EasyShade parameters regarding PEEK cores also showed comparable results as compared to the gold standard CoCrMo, regardless of the veneering material used. MDPI 2016-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5456785/ /pubmed/28773612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9060491 Text en © 2016 by the authors; Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stawarczyk, Bogna
Schmid, Philipp
Roos, Malgorzata
Eichberger, Marlis
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials
title Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials
title_full Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials
title_fullStr Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials
title_full_unstemmed Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials
title_short Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials
title_sort spectrophotometric evaluation of polyetheretherketone (peek) as a core material and a comparison with gold standard core materials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5456785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28773612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9060491
work_keys_str_mv AT stawarczykbogna spectrophotometricevaluationofpolyetheretherketonepeekasacorematerialandacomparisonwithgoldstandardcorematerials
AT schmidphilipp spectrophotometricevaluationofpolyetheretherketonepeekasacorematerialandacomparisonwithgoldstandardcorematerials
AT roosmalgorzata spectrophotometricevaluationofpolyetheretherketonepeekasacorematerialandacomparisonwithgoldstandardcorematerials
AT eichbergermarlis spectrophotometricevaluationofpolyetheretherketonepeekasacorematerialandacomparisonwithgoldstandardcorematerials
AT schmidlinpatrickr spectrophotometricevaluationofpolyetheretherketonepeekasacorematerialandacomparisonwithgoldstandardcorematerials