Cargando…
Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials?
A long-time drawback of dental composites is that they accumulate more biofilms and plaques than amalgam and glass ionomer restorative materials. It would be highly desirable to develop a new composite with reduced biofilm growth, while avoiding the non-esthetics of amalgam and low strength of glass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28774007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9110888 |
_version_ | 1783241503367233536 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Ning Melo, Mary A.S. Weir, Michael D. Reynolds, Mark A. Bai, Yuxing Xu, Hockin H.K. |
author_facet | Zhang, Ning Melo, Mary A.S. Weir, Michael D. Reynolds, Mark A. Bai, Yuxing Xu, Hockin H.K. |
author_sort | Zhang, Ning |
collection | PubMed |
description | A long-time drawback of dental composites is that they accumulate more biofilms and plaques than amalgam and glass ionomer restorative materials. It would be highly desirable to develop a new composite with reduced biofilm growth, while avoiding the non-esthetics of amalgam and low strength of glass ionomer. The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop a protein-repellent composite with reduced biofilms matching amalgam and glass ionomer for the first time; and (2) investigate their protein adsorption, biofilms, and mechanical properties. Five materials were tested: A new composite containing 3% of protein-repellent 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC); the composite with 0% MPC as control; commercial composite control; dental amalgam; resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). A dental plaque microcosm biofilm model with human saliva as inoculum was used to investigate metabolic activity, colony-forming units (CFU), and lactic acid production. Composite with 3% MPC had flexural strength similar to those with 0% MPC and commercial composite control (p > 0.1), and much greater than RMGI (p < 0.05). Composite with 3% MPC had protein adsorption that was only 1/10 that of control composites (p < 0.05). Composite with 3% MPC had biofilm CFU and lactic acid much lower than control composites (p < 0.05). Biofilm growth, metabolic activity and lactic acid on the new composite with 3% MPC were reduced to the low level of amalgam and RMGI (p > 0.1). In conclusion, a new protein-repellent dental resin composite reduced oral biofilm growth and acid production to the low levels of non-esthetic amalgam and RMGI for the first time. The long-held conclusion that dental composites accumulate more biofilms than amalgam and glass ionomer is no longer true. The novel composite is promising to finally overcome the major biofilm-accumulation drawback of dental composites in order to reduce biofilm acids and secondary caries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5457238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54572382017-07-28 Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials? Zhang, Ning Melo, Mary A.S. Weir, Michael D. Reynolds, Mark A. Bai, Yuxing Xu, Hockin H.K. Materials (Basel) Article A long-time drawback of dental composites is that they accumulate more biofilms and plaques than amalgam and glass ionomer restorative materials. It would be highly desirable to develop a new composite with reduced biofilm growth, while avoiding the non-esthetics of amalgam and low strength of glass ionomer. The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop a protein-repellent composite with reduced biofilms matching amalgam and glass ionomer for the first time; and (2) investigate their protein adsorption, biofilms, and mechanical properties. Five materials were tested: A new composite containing 3% of protein-repellent 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC); the composite with 0% MPC as control; commercial composite control; dental amalgam; resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). A dental plaque microcosm biofilm model with human saliva as inoculum was used to investigate metabolic activity, colony-forming units (CFU), and lactic acid production. Composite with 3% MPC had flexural strength similar to those with 0% MPC and commercial composite control (p > 0.1), and much greater than RMGI (p < 0.05). Composite with 3% MPC had protein adsorption that was only 1/10 that of control composites (p < 0.05). Composite with 3% MPC had biofilm CFU and lactic acid much lower than control composites (p < 0.05). Biofilm growth, metabolic activity and lactic acid on the new composite with 3% MPC were reduced to the low level of amalgam and RMGI (p > 0.1). In conclusion, a new protein-repellent dental resin composite reduced oral biofilm growth and acid production to the low levels of non-esthetic amalgam and RMGI for the first time. The long-held conclusion that dental composites accumulate more biofilms than amalgam and glass ionomer is no longer true. The novel composite is promising to finally overcome the major biofilm-accumulation drawback of dental composites in order to reduce biofilm acids and secondary caries. MDPI 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5457238/ /pubmed/28774007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9110888 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Ning Melo, Mary A.S. Weir, Michael D. Reynolds, Mark A. Bai, Yuxing Xu, Hockin H.K. Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials? |
title | Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials? |
title_full | Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials? |
title_fullStr | Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials? |
title_short | Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials? |
title_sort | do dental resin composites accumulate more oral biofilms and plaque than amalgam and glass ionomer materials? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28774007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9110888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangning dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials AT melomaryas dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials AT weirmichaeld dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials AT reynoldsmarka dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials AT baiyuxing dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials AT xuhockinhk dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials |