Cargando…

Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials?

A long-time drawback of dental composites is that they accumulate more biofilms and plaques than amalgam and glass ionomer restorative materials. It would be highly desirable to develop a new composite with reduced biofilm growth, while avoiding the non-esthetics of amalgam and low strength of glass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ning, Melo, Mary A.S., Weir, Michael D., Reynolds, Mark A., Bai, Yuxing, Xu, Hockin H.K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28774007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9110888
_version_ 1783241503367233536
author Zhang, Ning
Melo, Mary A.S.
Weir, Michael D.
Reynolds, Mark A.
Bai, Yuxing
Xu, Hockin H.K.
author_facet Zhang, Ning
Melo, Mary A.S.
Weir, Michael D.
Reynolds, Mark A.
Bai, Yuxing
Xu, Hockin H.K.
author_sort Zhang, Ning
collection PubMed
description A long-time drawback of dental composites is that they accumulate more biofilms and plaques than amalgam and glass ionomer restorative materials. It would be highly desirable to develop a new composite with reduced biofilm growth, while avoiding the non-esthetics of amalgam and low strength of glass ionomer. The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop a protein-repellent composite with reduced biofilms matching amalgam and glass ionomer for the first time; and (2) investigate their protein adsorption, biofilms, and mechanical properties. Five materials were tested: A new composite containing 3% of protein-repellent 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC); the composite with 0% MPC as control; commercial composite control; dental amalgam; resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). A dental plaque microcosm biofilm model with human saliva as inoculum was used to investigate metabolic activity, colony-forming units (CFU), and lactic acid production. Composite with 3% MPC had flexural strength similar to those with 0% MPC and commercial composite control (p > 0.1), and much greater than RMGI (p < 0.05). Composite with 3% MPC had protein adsorption that was only 1/10 that of control composites (p < 0.05). Composite with 3% MPC had biofilm CFU and lactic acid much lower than control composites (p < 0.05). Biofilm growth, metabolic activity and lactic acid on the new composite with 3% MPC were reduced to the low level of amalgam and RMGI (p > 0.1). In conclusion, a new protein-repellent dental resin composite reduced oral biofilm growth and acid production to the low levels of non-esthetic amalgam and RMGI for the first time. The long-held conclusion that dental composites accumulate more biofilms than amalgam and glass ionomer is no longer true. The novel composite is promising to finally overcome the major biofilm-accumulation drawback of dental composites in order to reduce biofilm acids and secondary caries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5457238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54572382017-07-28 Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials? Zhang, Ning Melo, Mary A.S. Weir, Michael D. Reynolds, Mark A. Bai, Yuxing Xu, Hockin H.K. Materials (Basel) Article A long-time drawback of dental composites is that they accumulate more biofilms and plaques than amalgam and glass ionomer restorative materials. It would be highly desirable to develop a new composite with reduced biofilm growth, while avoiding the non-esthetics of amalgam and low strength of glass ionomer. The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop a protein-repellent composite with reduced biofilms matching amalgam and glass ionomer for the first time; and (2) investigate their protein adsorption, biofilms, and mechanical properties. Five materials were tested: A new composite containing 3% of protein-repellent 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC); the composite with 0% MPC as control; commercial composite control; dental amalgam; resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). A dental plaque microcosm biofilm model with human saliva as inoculum was used to investigate metabolic activity, colony-forming units (CFU), and lactic acid production. Composite with 3% MPC had flexural strength similar to those with 0% MPC and commercial composite control (p > 0.1), and much greater than RMGI (p < 0.05). Composite with 3% MPC had protein adsorption that was only 1/10 that of control composites (p < 0.05). Composite with 3% MPC had biofilm CFU and lactic acid much lower than control composites (p < 0.05). Biofilm growth, metabolic activity and lactic acid on the new composite with 3% MPC were reduced to the low level of amalgam and RMGI (p > 0.1). In conclusion, a new protein-repellent dental resin composite reduced oral biofilm growth and acid production to the low levels of non-esthetic amalgam and RMGI for the first time. The long-held conclusion that dental composites accumulate more biofilms than amalgam and glass ionomer is no longer true. The novel composite is promising to finally overcome the major biofilm-accumulation drawback of dental composites in order to reduce biofilm acids and secondary caries. MDPI 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5457238/ /pubmed/28774007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9110888 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Ning
Melo, Mary A.S.
Weir, Michael D.
Reynolds, Mark A.
Bai, Yuxing
Xu, Hockin H.K.
Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials?
title Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials?
title_full Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials?
title_fullStr Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials?
title_full_unstemmed Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials?
title_short Do Dental Resin Composites Accumulate More Oral Biofilms and Plaque than Amalgam and Glass Ionomer Materials?
title_sort do dental resin composites accumulate more oral biofilms and plaque than amalgam and glass ionomer materials?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28774007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9110888
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangning dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials
AT melomaryas dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials
AT weirmichaeld dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials
AT reynoldsmarka dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials
AT baiyuxing dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials
AT xuhockinhk dodentalresincompositesaccumulatemoreoralbiofilmsandplaquethanamalgamandglassionomermaterials