Cargando…
The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients
BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems (DSS) aimed at supporting diagnosis are not widely used. This is mainly due to usability issues and lack of integration into clinical work and the electronic health record (EHR). In this study we examined the usability and acceptability of a diagnostic D...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28576145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6 |
_version_ | 1783241575835369472 |
---|---|
author | Porat, Talya Delaney, Brendan Kostopoulou, Olga |
author_facet | Porat, Talya Delaney, Brendan Kostopoulou, Olga |
author_sort | Porat, Talya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems (DSS) aimed at supporting diagnosis are not widely used. This is mainly due to usability issues and lack of integration into clinical work and the electronic health record (EHR). In this study we examined the usability and acceptability of a diagnostic DSS prototype integrated with the EHR and in comparison with the EHR alone. METHODS: Thirty-four General Practitioners (GPs) consulted with 6 standardised patients (SPs) using only their EHR system (baseline session); on another day, they consulted with 6 different but matched for difficulty SPs, using the EHR with the integrated DSS prototype (DSS session). GPs were interviewed twice (at the end of each session), and completed the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire at the end of the DSS session. The SPs completed the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire after each consultation. RESULTS: The majority of GPs (74%) found the DSS useful: it helped them consider more diagnoses and ask more targeted questions. They considered three user interface features to be the most useful: (1) integration with the EHR; (2) suggested diagnoses to consider at the start of the consultation and; (3) the checklist of symptoms and signs in relation to each suggested diagnosis. There were also criticisms: half of the GPs felt that the DSS changed their consultation style, by requiring them to code symptoms and signs while interacting with the patient. SPs sometimes commented that GPs were looking at their computer more than at them; this comment was made more often in the DSS session (15%) than in the baseline session (3%). Nevertheless, SP ratings on the satisfaction questionnaire did not differ between the two sessions. CONCLUSIONS: To use the DSS effectively, GPs would need to adapt their consultation style, so that they code more information during rather than at the end of the consultation. This presents a potential barrier to adoption. Training GPs to use the system in a patient-centred way, as well as improvement of the DSS interface itself, could facilitate coding. To enhance patient acceptability, patients should be informed about the potential of the DSS to improve diagnostic accuracy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5457602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54576022017-06-06 The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients Porat, Talya Delaney, Brendan Kostopoulou, Olga BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems (DSS) aimed at supporting diagnosis are not widely used. This is mainly due to usability issues and lack of integration into clinical work and the electronic health record (EHR). In this study we examined the usability and acceptability of a diagnostic DSS prototype integrated with the EHR and in comparison with the EHR alone. METHODS: Thirty-four General Practitioners (GPs) consulted with 6 standardised patients (SPs) using only their EHR system (baseline session); on another day, they consulted with 6 different but matched for difficulty SPs, using the EHR with the integrated DSS prototype (DSS session). GPs were interviewed twice (at the end of each session), and completed the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire at the end of the DSS session. The SPs completed the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire after each consultation. RESULTS: The majority of GPs (74%) found the DSS useful: it helped them consider more diagnoses and ask more targeted questions. They considered three user interface features to be the most useful: (1) integration with the EHR; (2) suggested diagnoses to consider at the start of the consultation and; (3) the checklist of symptoms and signs in relation to each suggested diagnosis. There were also criticisms: half of the GPs felt that the DSS changed their consultation style, by requiring them to code symptoms and signs while interacting with the patient. SPs sometimes commented that GPs were looking at their computer more than at them; this comment was made more often in the DSS session (15%) than in the baseline session (3%). Nevertheless, SP ratings on the satisfaction questionnaire did not differ between the two sessions. CONCLUSIONS: To use the DSS effectively, GPs would need to adapt their consultation style, so that they code more information during rather than at the end of the consultation. This presents a potential barrier to adoption. Training GPs to use the system in a patient-centred way, as well as improvement of the DSS interface itself, could facilitate coding. To enhance patient acceptability, patients should be informed about the potential of the DSS to improve diagnostic accuracy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5457602/ /pubmed/28576145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Porat, Talya Delaney, Brendan Kostopoulou, Olga The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients |
title | The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients |
title_full | The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients |
title_fullStr | The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients |
title_short | The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients |
title_sort | impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of gps and patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28576145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT porattalya theimpactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients AT delaneybrendan theimpactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients AT kostopoulouolga theimpactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients AT porattalya impactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients AT delaneybrendan impactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients AT kostopoulouolga impactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients |