Cargando…

The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems (DSS) aimed at supporting diagnosis are not widely used. This is mainly due to usability issues and lack of integration into clinical work and the electronic health record (EHR). In this study we examined the usability and acceptability of a diagnostic D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Porat, Talya, Delaney, Brendan, Kostopoulou, Olga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28576145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6
_version_ 1783241575835369472
author Porat, Talya
Delaney, Brendan
Kostopoulou, Olga
author_facet Porat, Talya
Delaney, Brendan
Kostopoulou, Olga
author_sort Porat, Talya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems (DSS) aimed at supporting diagnosis are not widely used. This is mainly due to usability issues and lack of integration into clinical work and the electronic health record (EHR). In this study we examined the usability and acceptability of a diagnostic DSS prototype integrated with the EHR and in comparison with the EHR alone. METHODS: Thirty-four General Practitioners (GPs) consulted with 6 standardised patients (SPs) using only their EHR system (baseline session); on another day, they consulted with 6 different but matched for difficulty SPs, using the EHR with the integrated DSS prototype (DSS session). GPs were interviewed twice (at the end of each session), and completed the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire at the end of the DSS session. The SPs completed the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire after each consultation. RESULTS: The majority of GPs (74%) found the DSS useful: it helped them consider more diagnoses and ask more targeted questions. They considered three user interface features to be the most useful: (1) integration with the EHR; (2) suggested diagnoses to consider at the start of the consultation and; (3) the checklist of symptoms and signs in relation to each suggested diagnosis. There were also criticisms: half of the GPs felt that the DSS changed their consultation style, by requiring them to code symptoms and signs while interacting with the patient. SPs sometimes commented that GPs were looking at their computer more than at them; this comment was made more often in the DSS session (15%) than in the baseline session (3%). Nevertheless, SP ratings on the satisfaction questionnaire did not differ between the two sessions. CONCLUSIONS: To use the DSS effectively, GPs would need to adapt their consultation style, so that they code more information during rather than at the end of the consultation. This presents a potential barrier to adoption. Training GPs to use the system in a patient-centred way, as well as improvement of the DSS interface itself, could facilitate coding. To enhance patient acceptability, patients should be informed about the potential of the DSS to improve diagnostic accuracy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5457602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54576022017-06-06 The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients Porat, Talya Delaney, Brendan Kostopoulou, Olga BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems (DSS) aimed at supporting diagnosis are not widely used. This is mainly due to usability issues and lack of integration into clinical work and the electronic health record (EHR). In this study we examined the usability and acceptability of a diagnostic DSS prototype integrated with the EHR and in comparison with the EHR alone. METHODS: Thirty-four General Practitioners (GPs) consulted with 6 standardised patients (SPs) using only their EHR system (baseline session); on another day, they consulted with 6 different but matched for difficulty SPs, using the EHR with the integrated DSS prototype (DSS session). GPs were interviewed twice (at the end of each session), and completed the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire at the end of the DSS session. The SPs completed the Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire after each consultation. RESULTS: The majority of GPs (74%) found the DSS useful: it helped them consider more diagnoses and ask more targeted questions. They considered three user interface features to be the most useful: (1) integration with the EHR; (2) suggested diagnoses to consider at the start of the consultation and; (3) the checklist of symptoms and signs in relation to each suggested diagnosis. There were also criticisms: half of the GPs felt that the DSS changed their consultation style, by requiring them to code symptoms and signs while interacting with the patient. SPs sometimes commented that GPs were looking at their computer more than at them; this comment was made more often in the DSS session (15%) than in the baseline session (3%). Nevertheless, SP ratings on the satisfaction questionnaire did not differ between the two sessions. CONCLUSIONS: To use the DSS effectively, GPs would need to adapt their consultation style, so that they code more information during rather than at the end of the consultation. This presents a potential barrier to adoption. Training GPs to use the system in a patient-centred way, as well as improvement of the DSS interface itself, could facilitate coding. To enhance patient acceptability, patients should be informed about the potential of the DSS to improve diagnostic accuracy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5457602/ /pubmed/28576145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Porat, Talya
Delaney, Brendan
Kostopoulou, Olga
The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients
title The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients
title_full The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients
title_fullStr The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients
title_full_unstemmed The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients
title_short The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients
title_sort impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of gps and patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28576145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6
work_keys_str_mv AT porattalya theimpactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients
AT delaneybrendan theimpactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients
AT kostopoulouolga theimpactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients
AT porattalya impactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients
AT delaneybrendan impactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients
AT kostopoulouolga impactofadiagnosticdecisionsupportsystemontheconsultationperceptionsofgpsandpatients