Cargando…

Misdiagnosis of HIV treatment failure based on clinical and immunological criteria in Eastern and Central Kenya

BACKGROUND: Routine laboratory monitoring is part of the basic care package offered to people living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV). This paper aims to identify the proportion of PLHIVs with clinical and immunological failure who are virologically suppressed and risk being misclassifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joram, Sunguti Luke, Paul, Gathii, Moses, Kitheka, Stanley, Bii, Isaac, Malonza, Allan, Gohole, Tom, Marwa, Lilian, Karimi, Mildred, Mudany
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28577527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2487-5
_version_ 1783241577772089344
author Joram, Sunguti Luke
Paul, Gathii
Moses, Kitheka
Stanley, Bii
Isaac, Malonza
Allan, Gohole
Tom, Marwa
Lilian, Karimi
Mildred, Mudany
author_facet Joram, Sunguti Luke
Paul, Gathii
Moses, Kitheka
Stanley, Bii
Isaac, Malonza
Allan, Gohole
Tom, Marwa
Lilian, Karimi
Mildred, Mudany
author_sort Joram, Sunguti Luke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routine laboratory monitoring is part of the basic care package offered to people living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV). This paper aims to identify the proportion of PLHIVs with clinical and immunological failure who are virologically suppressed and risk being misclassified as treatment failures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patient viral load data collected between January 2013 and June 2014 was conducted. Of the patients classified as experiencing either clinical or immunological failure, we evaluated the proportion of true (virological) failure, and estimated the sensitivity and specificity of the immunological and clinical criteria in diagnosing true treatment failure. RESULTS: Of the 27,418 PLHIVs aged 2–80 years on ART in the study period, 6.8% (n = 1859) were suspected of treatment failure and their viral loads analysed. 40% (n = 737) demonstrated viral suppression (VL < 1000 copies/ml). The median viral load (VL) was 3317 copies/ml (IQR 0–47,547). Among the 799 (2.9%) PLHIVs on ART classified as having clinical failure, 41.1% (n = 328) of them had confirmed viral suppression. Of the 463 (1.7%) classified as having immunological failure, 36.9% (n = 171) had confirmed viral suppression. The sensitivity of the clinical criteria in diagnosing true failure was 61% (CI 58%–65%) while that of the immunological criteria 38% (CI 35%–42%). The specificity of the clinical criteria was 34% (CI 30%–39%) while that of the immunological criteria 66% (61%–70%). Age below 20 years was associated with a high viral load (p < .001). Sex and ART regimen were not associated with the viral load. CONCLUSION: Clinical and immunological criteria alone are not sufficient to identify true treatment failure. There is need for accurate treatment failure diagnosis through viral load testing to avoid incorrect early or delayed switching of patients to second-line regimens. This study recommends increased viral load testing in line with the Kenya’s ART guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5457609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54576092017-06-06 Misdiagnosis of HIV treatment failure based on clinical and immunological criteria in Eastern and Central Kenya Joram, Sunguti Luke Paul, Gathii Moses, Kitheka Stanley, Bii Isaac, Malonza Allan, Gohole Tom, Marwa Lilian, Karimi Mildred, Mudany BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Routine laboratory monitoring is part of the basic care package offered to people living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV). This paper aims to identify the proportion of PLHIVs with clinical and immunological failure who are virologically suppressed and risk being misclassified as treatment failures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patient viral load data collected between January 2013 and June 2014 was conducted. Of the patients classified as experiencing either clinical or immunological failure, we evaluated the proportion of true (virological) failure, and estimated the sensitivity and specificity of the immunological and clinical criteria in diagnosing true treatment failure. RESULTS: Of the 27,418 PLHIVs aged 2–80 years on ART in the study period, 6.8% (n = 1859) were suspected of treatment failure and their viral loads analysed. 40% (n = 737) demonstrated viral suppression (VL < 1000 copies/ml). The median viral load (VL) was 3317 copies/ml (IQR 0–47,547). Among the 799 (2.9%) PLHIVs on ART classified as having clinical failure, 41.1% (n = 328) of them had confirmed viral suppression. Of the 463 (1.7%) classified as having immunological failure, 36.9% (n = 171) had confirmed viral suppression. The sensitivity of the clinical criteria in diagnosing true failure was 61% (CI 58%–65%) while that of the immunological criteria 38% (CI 35%–42%). The specificity of the clinical criteria was 34% (CI 30%–39%) while that of the immunological criteria 66% (61%–70%). Age below 20 years was associated with a high viral load (p < .001). Sex and ART regimen were not associated with the viral load. CONCLUSION: Clinical and immunological criteria alone are not sufficient to identify true treatment failure. There is need for accurate treatment failure diagnosis through viral load testing to avoid incorrect early or delayed switching of patients to second-line regimens. This study recommends increased viral load testing in line with the Kenya’s ART guidelines. BioMed Central 2017-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5457609/ /pubmed/28577527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2487-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Joram, Sunguti Luke
Paul, Gathii
Moses, Kitheka
Stanley, Bii
Isaac, Malonza
Allan, Gohole
Tom, Marwa
Lilian, Karimi
Mildred, Mudany
Misdiagnosis of HIV treatment failure based on clinical and immunological criteria in Eastern and Central Kenya
title Misdiagnosis of HIV treatment failure based on clinical and immunological criteria in Eastern and Central Kenya
title_full Misdiagnosis of HIV treatment failure based on clinical and immunological criteria in Eastern and Central Kenya
title_fullStr Misdiagnosis of HIV treatment failure based on clinical and immunological criteria in Eastern and Central Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Misdiagnosis of HIV treatment failure based on clinical and immunological criteria in Eastern and Central Kenya
title_short Misdiagnosis of HIV treatment failure based on clinical and immunological criteria in Eastern and Central Kenya
title_sort misdiagnosis of hiv treatment failure based on clinical and immunological criteria in eastern and central kenya
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28577527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2487-5
work_keys_str_mv AT joramsungutiluke misdiagnosisofhivtreatmentfailurebasedonclinicalandimmunologicalcriteriaineasternandcentralkenya
AT paulgathii misdiagnosisofhivtreatmentfailurebasedonclinicalandimmunologicalcriteriaineasternandcentralkenya
AT moseskitheka misdiagnosisofhivtreatmentfailurebasedonclinicalandimmunologicalcriteriaineasternandcentralkenya
AT stanleybii misdiagnosisofhivtreatmentfailurebasedonclinicalandimmunologicalcriteriaineasternandcentralkenya
AT isaacmalonza misdiagnosisofhivtreatmentfailurebasedonclinicalandimmunologicalcriteriaineasternandcentralkenya
AT allangohole misdiagnosisofhivtreatmentfailurebasedonclinicalandimmunologicalcriteriaineasternandcentralkenya
AT tommarwa misdiagnosisofhivtreatmentfailurebasedonclinicalandimmunologicalcriteriaineasternandcentralkenya
AT liliankarimi misdiagnosisofhivtreatmentfailurebasedonclinicalandimmunologicalcriteriaineasternandcentralkenya
AT mildredmudany misdiagnosisofhivtreatmentfailurebasedonclinicalandimmunologicalcriteriaineasternandcentralkenya