Cargando…
Significant reduction of fluoroscopy repetition with lumbar localization system in minimally invasive spine surgery: A prospective study
The conventional location methods for minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) were mainly based on repeated fluoroscopy in a trial-and-error manner preoperatively and intraoperatively. Localization system mainly consisted of preoperative applied radiopaque frame and intraoperative guiding device, w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28538369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006684 |
_version_ | 1783241622902800384 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Guoxin Zhang, Hailong Gu, Xin Wang, Chuanfeng Guan, Xiaofei Fan, Yunshan He, Shisheng |
author_facet | Fan, Guoxin Zhang, Hailong Gu, Xin Wang, Chuanfeng Guan, Xiaofei Fan, Yunshan He, Shisheng |
author_sort | Fan, Guoxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The conventional location methods for minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) were mainly based on repeated fluoroscopy in a trial-and-error manner preoperatively and intraoperatively. Localization system mainly consisted of preoperative applied radiopaque frame and intraoperative guiding device, which has the potential to minimize fluoroscopy repetition in MISS. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel lumbar localization system in reducing radiation exposure to patients. Included patients underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MISTLIF) or percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED). Patients treated with novel localization system were regarded as Group A, and patients treated without novel localization system were regarded as Group B. For PTED, The estimated effective dose was 0.41 ± 0.13 mSv in Group A and 0.57 ± 0.14 mSv in Group B (P < .001); the fluoroscopy exposure time of PTED was 22.18 ± 7.30 seconds in Group A and 30.53 ± 7.56 seconds in Group B (P < .001); The estimated cancer risk of radiation exposure was 22.68 ± 7.38 (10(–6)) in Group A and 31.20 ± 7.96 (10(–6)) in Group B (P < .001). For MISTLIF, the estimated effective dose was 0.45 ± 0.09 mSv in Group A and 0.58 ± 0.09 mSv in Group B (P < .001); The fluoroscopy exposure time was 25.41 ± 5.52 seconds in Group A and 32.82 ± 5.03 seconds in Group B (P < .001); The estimated cancer risk was 24.90 ± 5.15 (10(–6)) in Group A and 31.96 ± 5.04 (10(–6)) in Group B (P < .001). There were also significant differences in localization time and operation time between the 2 groups either for MISTLIF or PTED. The lumbar localization system could be a potential protection strategy for minimizing radiation hazards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5457849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54578492017-06-09 Significant reduction of fluoroscopy repetition with lumbar localization system in minimally invasive spine surgery: A prospective study Fan, Guoxin Zhang, Hailong Gu, Xin Wang, Chuanfeng Guan, Xiaofei Fan, Yunshan He, Shisheng Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 The conventional location methods for minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) were mainly based on repeated fluoroscopy in a trial-and-error manner preoperatively and intraoperatively. Localization system mainly consisted of preoperative applied radiopaque frame and intraoperative guiding device, which has the potential to minimize fluoroscopy repetition in MISS. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel lumbar localization system in reducing radiation exposure to patients. Included patients underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MISTLIF) or percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED). Patients treated with novel localization system were regarded as Group A, and patients treated without novel localization system were regarded as Group B. For PTED, The estimated effective dose was 0.41 ± 0.13 mSv in Group A and 0.57 ± 0.14 mSv in Group B (P < .001); the fluoroscopy exposure time of PTED was 22.18 ± 7.30 seconds in Group A and 30.53 ± 7.56 seconds in Group B (P < .001); The estimated cancer risk of radiation exposure was 22.68 ± 7.38 (10(–6)) in Group A and 31.20 ± 7.96 (10(–6)) in Group B (P < .001). For MISTLIF, the estimated effective dose was 0.45 ± 0.09 mSv in Group A and 0.58 ± 0.09 mSv in Group B (P < .001); The fluoroscopy exposure time was 25.41 ± 5.52 seconds in Group A and 32.82 ± 5.03 seconds in Group B (P < .001); The estimated cancer risk was 24.90 ± 5.15 (10(–6)) in Group A and 31.96 ± 5.04 (10(–6)) in Group B (P < .001). There were also significant differences in localization time and operation time between the 2 groups either for MISTLIF or PTED. The lumbar localization system could be a potential protection strategy for minimizing radiation hazards. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5457849/ /pubmed/28538369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006684 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7100 Fan, Guoxin Zhang, Hailong Gu, Xin Wang, Chuanfeng Guan, Xiaofei Fan, Yunshan He, Shisheng Significant reduction of fluoroscopy repetition with lumbar localization system in minimally invasive spine surgery: A prospective study |
title | Significant reduction of fluoroscopy repetition with lumbar localization system in minimally invasive spine surgery: A prospective study |
title_full | Significant reduction of fluoroscopy repetition with lumbar localization system in minimally invasive spine surgery: A prospective study |
title_fullStr | Significant reduction of fluoroscopy repetition with lumbar localization system in minimally invasive spine surgery: A prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Significant reduction of fluoroscopy repetition with lumbar localization system in minimally invasive spine surgery: A prospective study |
title_short | Significant reduction of fluoroscopy repetition with lumbar localization system in minimally invasive spine surgery: A prospective study |
title_sort | significant reduction of fluoroscopy repetition with lumbar localization system in minimally invasive spine surgery: a prospective study |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28538369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanguoxin significantreductionoffluoroscopyrepetitionwithlumbarlocalizationsysteminminimallyinvasivespinesurgeryaprospectivestudy AT zhanghailong significantreductionoffluoroscopyrepetitionwithlumbarlocalizationsysteminminimallyinvasivespinesurgeryaprospectivestudy AT guxin significantreductionoffluoroscopyrepetitionwithlumbarlocalizationsysteminminimallyinvasivespinesurgeryaprospectivestudy AT wangchuanfeng significantreductionoffluoroscopyrepetitionwithlumbarlocalizationsysteminminimallyinvasivespinesurgeryaprospectivestudy AT guanxiaofei significantreductionoffluoroscopyrepetitionwithlumbarlocalizationsysteminminimallyinvasivespinesurgeryaprospectivestudy AT fanyunshan significantreductionoffluoroscopyrepetitionwithlumbarlocalizationsysteminminimallyinvasivespinesurgeryaprospectivestudy AT heshisheng significantreductionoffluoroscopyrepetitionwithlumbarlocalizationsysteminminimallyinvasivespinesurgeryaprospectivestudy |