Cargando…

“Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it?

BACKGROUND: The Bethesda System uses a two-tiered approach in the diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). Occasionally, Papanicolaou (Pap) tests with evident low-grade SIL (LSIL) also have some features suggestive but not diagnostic of high-grade SIL (HSIL). This study reviews...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiaffarano, Jeanine M., Alexander, Melissa, Rogers, Robert, Zhou, Fang, Cangiarella, Joan, Yee-Chang, Melissa, Elgert, Paul, Simsir, Aylin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5458421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603542
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_48_16
_version_ 1783241757397352448
author Chiaffarano, Jeanine M.
Alexander, Melissa
Rogers, Robert
Zhou, Fang
Cangiarella, Joan
Yee-Chang, Melissa
Elgert, Paul
Simsir, Aylin
author_facet Chiaffarano, Jeanine M.
Alexander, Melissa
Rogers, Robert
Zhou, Fang
Cangiarella, Joan
Yee-Chang, Melissa
Elgert, Paul
Simsir, Aylin
author_sort Chiaffarano, Jeanine M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Bethesda System uses a two-tiered approach in the diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). Occasionally, Papanicolaou (Pap) tests with evident low-grade SIL (LSIL) also have some features suggestive but not diagnostic of high-grade SIL (HSIL). This study reviews our experience with “Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, Cannot Exclude High-grade” (LSIL-H) and discusses the best approach to report such Paps if the LSIL-H interpretation is abandoned. METHODS: Abnormal Paps were identified between January and December 2014 that had surgical follow-up within 6 months. Their biopsy outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's Chi-square and McNemar tests in SPSS software version 23. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were a total of 1049 abnormal Paps with follow-up. High-grade dysplasia/carcinoma (HGD+) was found in 8% of LSIL, 30% of LSIL-H, 52% of atypical squamous cells (ASCs), cannot rule out HSIL (ASC-H), and 77% of HSIL Paps. The detection rate of HGD+ for LSIL-H was between that of LSIL (Pearson's Chi-square test, P = 0.000) and ASC-H (P = 0.04). If LSIL-H cases are reported as ASC-H, the rate of HGD+ for the ASC-H category would decrease from 51.5% to 37.4% (McNemar test, P = 0.000). Alternatively, if LSIL-H cases are downgraded to LSIL, the rate of HGD+ for the LSIL category would rise from 7.7% to 10.4% (McNemar test, P = 0.000). Nearly 86.7% of LSIL-H cases were positive for high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) in comparison to 77.5% of LSILs, 100% of ASC-Hs, and 75% of HSILs. The sample size for HR-HPV and LSIL-H was too small for meaningful statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: “LSIL-H” category detects more HGD+ than LSIL, and fewer than ASC-H and HSIL. If LSIL-H is eliminated, Paps with this finding are best reported as ASC-H to ensure that women with potential HGD+ undergo colposcopy in a timely manner. Reporting LSIL-H as LSIL may delay colposcopy since management of LSIL Paps depends on multiple factors (age, HPV status, etc.).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5458421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54584212017-06-09 “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it? Chiaffarano, Jeanine M. Alexander, Melissa Rogers, Robert Zhou, Fang Cangiarella, Joan Yee-Chang, Melissa Elgert, Paul Simsir, Aylin Cytojournal Research Article BACKGROUND: The Bethesda System uses a two-tiered approach in the diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). Occasionally, Papanicolaou (Pap) tests with evident low-grade SIL (LSIL) also have some features suggestive but not diagnostic of high-grade SIL (HSIL). This study reviews our experience with “Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, Cannot Exclude High-grade” (LSIL-H) and discusses the best approach to report such Paps if the LSIL-H interpretation is abandoned. METHODS: Abnormal Paps were identified between January and December 2014 that had surgical follow-up within 6 months. Their biopsy outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's Chi-square and McNemar tests in SPSS software version 23. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were a total of 1049 abnormal Paps with follow-up. High-grade dysplasia/carcinoma (HGD+) was found in 8% of LSIL, 30% of LSIL-H, 52% of atypical squamous cells (ASCs), cannot rule out HSIL (ASC-H), and 77% of HSIL Paps. The detection rate of HGD+ for LSIL-H was between that of LSIL (Pearson's Chi-square test, P = 0.000) and ASC-H (P = 0.04). If LSIL-H cases are reported as ASC-H, the rate of HGD+ for the ASC-H category would decrease from 51.5% to 37.4% (McNemar test, P = 0.000). Alternatively, if LSIL-H cases are downgraded to LSIL, the rate of HGD+ for the LSIL category would rise from 7.7% to 10.4% (McNemar test, P = 0.000). Nearly 86.7% of LSIL-H cases were positive for high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) in comparison to 77.5% of LSILs, 100% of ASC-Hs, and 75% of HSILs. The sample size for HR-HPV and LSIL-H was too small for meaningful statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: “LSIL-H” category detects more HGD+ than LSIL, and fewer than ASC-H and HSIL. If LSIL-H is eliminated, Paps with this finding are best reported as ASC-H to ensure that women with potential HGD+ undergo colposcopy in a timely manner. Reporting LSIL-H as LSIL may delay colposcopy since management of LSIL Paps depends on multiple factors (age, HPV status, etc.). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5458421/ /pubmed/28603542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_48_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Chiaffarano, et al.; Licensee Cytopathology Foundation Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chiaffarano, Jeanine M.
Alexander, Melissa
Rogers, Robert
Zhou, Fang
Cangiarella, Joan
Yee-Chang, Melissa
Elgert, Paul
Simsir, Aylin
“Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it?
title “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it?
title_full “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it?
title_fullStr “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it?
title_full_unstemmed “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it?
title_short “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it?
title_sort “low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” tbs says “don’t use it!” should i really stop it?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5458421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603542
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_48_16
work_keys_str_mv AT chiaffaranojeaninem lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit
AT alexandermelissa lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit
AT rogersrobert lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit
AT zhoufang lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit
AT cangiarellajoan lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit
AT yeechangmelissa lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit
AT elgertpaul lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit
AT simsiraylin lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit