Cargando…
“Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it?
BACKGROUND: The Bethesda System uses a two-tiered approach in the diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). Occasionally, Papanicolaou (Pap) tests with evident low-grade SIL (LSIL) also have some features suggestive but not diagnostic of high-grade SIL (HSIL). This study reviews...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5458421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_48_16 |
_version_ | 1783241757397352448 |
---|---|
author | Chiaffarano, Jeanine M. Alexander, Melissa Rogers, Robert Zhou, Fang Cangiarella, Joan Yee-Chang, Melissa Elgert, Paul Simsir, Aylin |
author_facet | Chiaffarano, Jeanine M. Alexander, Melissa Rogers, Robert Zhou, Fang Cangiarella, Joan Yee-Chang, Melissa Elgert, Paul Simsir, Aylin |
author_sort | Chiaffarano, Jeanine M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Bethesda System uses a two-tiered approach in the diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). Occasionally, Papanicolaou (Pap) tests with evident low-grade SIL (LSIL) also have some features suggestive but not diagnostic of high-grade SIL (HSIL). This study reviews our experience with “Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, Cannot Exclude High-grade” (LSIL-H) and discusses the best approach to report such Paps if the LSIL-H interpretation is abandoned. METHODS: Abnormal Paps were identified between January and December 2014 that had surgical follow-up within 6 months. Their biopsy outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's Chi-square and McNemar tests in SPSS software version 23. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were a total of 1049 abnormal Paps with follow-up. High-grade dysplasia/carcinoma (HGD+) was found in 8% of LSIL, 30% of LSIL-H, 52% of atypical squamous cells (ASCs), cannot rule out HSIL (ASC-H), and 77% of HSIL Paps. The detection rate of HGD+ for LSIL-H was between that of LSIL (Pearson's Chi-square test, P = 0.000) and ASC-H (P = 0.04). If LSIL-H cases are reported as ASC-H, the rate of HGD+ for the ASC-H category would decrease from 51.5% to 37.4% (McNemar test, P = 0.000). Alternatively, if LSIL-H cases are downgraded to LSIL, the rate of HGD+ for the LSIL category would rise from 7.7% to 10.4% (McNemar test, P = 0.000). Nearly 86.7% of LSIL-H cases were positive for high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) in comparison to 77.5% of LSILs, 100% of ASC-Hs, and 75% of HSILs. The sample size for HR-HPV and LSIL-H was too small for meaningful statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: “LSIL-H” category detects more HGD+ than LSIL, and fewer than ASC-H and HSIL. If LSIL-H is eliminated, Paps with this finding are best reported as ASC-H to ensure that women with potential HGD+ undergo colposcopy in a timely manner. Reporting LSIL-H as LSIL may delay colposcopy since management of LSIL Paps depends on multiple factors (age, HPV status, etc.). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5458421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54584212017-06-09 “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it? Chiaffarano, Jeanine M. Alexander, Melissa Rogers, Robert Zhou, Fang Cangiarella, Joan Yee-Chang, Melissa Elgert, Paul Simsir, Aylin Cytojournal Research Article BACKGROUND: The Bethesda System uses a two-tiered approach in the diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). Occasionally, Papanicolaou (Pap) tests with evident low-grade SIL (LSIL) also have some features suggestive but not diagnostic of high-grade SIL (HSIL). This study reviews our experience with “Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, Cannot Exclude High-grade” (LSIL-H) and discusses the best approach to report such Paps if the LSIL-H interpretation is abandoned. METHODS: Abnormal Paps were identified between January and December 2014 that had surgical follow-up within 6 months. Their biopsy outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's Chi-square and McNemar tests in SPSS software version 23. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were a total of 1049 abnormal Paps with follow-up. High-grade dysplasia/carcinoma (HGD+) was found in 8% of LSIL, 30% of LSIL-H, 52% of atypical squamous cells (ASCs), cannot rule out HSIL (ASC-H), and 77% of HSIL Paps. The detection rate of HGD+ for LSIL-H was between that of LSIL (Pearson's Chi-square test, P = 0.000) and ASC-H (P = 0.04). If LSIL-H cases are reported as ASC-H, the rate of HGD+ for the ASC-H category would decrease from 51.5% to 37.4% (McNemar test, P = 0.000). Alternatively, if LSIL-H cases are downgraded to LSIL, the rate of HGD+ for the LSIL category would rise from 7.7% to 10.4% (McNemar test, P = 0.000). Nearly 86.7% of LSIL-H cases were positive for high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) in comparison to 77.5% of LSILs, 100% of ASC-Hs, and 75% of HSILs. The sample size for HR-HPV and LSIL-H was too small for meaningful statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: “LSIL-H” category detects more HGD+ than LSIL, and fewer than ASC-H and HSIL. If LSIL-H is eliminated, Paps with this finding are best reported as ASC-H to ensure that women with potential HGD+ undergo colposcopy in a timely manner. Reporting LSIL-H as LSIL may delay colposcopy since management of LSIL Paps depends on multiple factors (age, HPV status, etc.). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5458421/ /pubmed/28603542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_48_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Chiaffarano, et al.; Licensee Cytopathology Foundation Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chiaffarano, Jeanine M. Alexander, Melissa Rogers, Robert Zhou, Fang Cangiarella, Joan Yee-Chang, Melissa Elgert, Paul Simsir, Aylin “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it? |
title | “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it? |
title_full | “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it? |
title_fullStr | “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it? |
title_full_unstemmed | “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it? |
title_short | “Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” TBS says “Don’t Use It!” should I really stop it? |
title_sort | “low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade:” tbs says “don’t use it!” should i really stop it? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5458421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603542 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_48_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiaffaranojeaninem lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit AT alexandermelissa lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit AT rogersrobert lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit AT zhoufang lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit AT cangiarellajoan lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit AT yeechangmelissa lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit AT elgertpaul lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit AT simsiraylin lowgradesquamousintraepitheliallesioncannotexcludehighgradetbssaysdontuseitshouldireallystopit |