Cargando…

Effect of Different Manufacturing Methods on the Conflict between Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Spiral and Porous Polyethylene Terephthalate/Sodium Alginate Bone Scaffolds

In order to solve the incompatibility between high porosity and mechanical properties, this study fabricates bone scaffolds by combining braids and sodium alginate (SA) membranes. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plied yarns are braided into hollow, porous three dimensional (3D) PET braids, which ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lou, Ching-Wen, Huang, Chien-Lin, Chen, Chih-Kuang, Liu, Chi-Fan, Wen, Shih-Peng, Lin, Jia-Horng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5458857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28793744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8125488
_version_ 1783241838929379328
author Lou, Ching-Wen
Huang, Chien-Lin
Chen, Chih-Kuang
Liu, Chi-Fan
Wen, Shih-Peng
Lin, Jia-Horng
author_facet Lou, Ching-Wen
Huang, Chien-Lin
Chen, Chih-Kuang
Liu, Chi-Fan
Wen, Shih-Peng
Lin, Jia-Horng
author_sort Lou, Ching-Wen
collection PubMed
description In order to solve the incompatibility between high porosity and mechanical properties, this study fabricates bone scaffolds by combining braids and sodium alginate (SA) membranes. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plied yarns are braided into hollow, porous three dimensional (3D) PET braids, which are then immersed in SA solution, followed by cross-linking with calcium chloride (CaCl(2)) and drying, to form PET bone scaffolds. Next, SA membranes are rolled and then inserted into the braids to form the spiral and porous PET/SA bone scaffolds. Samples are finally evaluated for surface observation, porosity, water contact angle, compressive strength, and MTT assay. The test results show that the PET bone scaffolds and PET/SA bone scaffolds both have good hydrophilicity. An increasing number of layers and an increasing CaCl(2) concentration cause the messy, loose surface structure to become neat and compact, which, in turn, decreases the porosity and increases the compressive strength. The MTT assay results show that the cell viability of differing SA membranes is beyond 100%, indicating that the PET/SA bone scaffolds containing SA membranes are biocompatible for cell attachment and proliferation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5458857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54588572017-07-28 Effect of Different Manufacturing Methods on the Conflict between Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Spiral and Porous Polyethylene Terephthalate/Sodium Alginate Bone Scaffolds Lou, Ching-Wen Huang, Chien-Lin Chen, Chih-Kuang Liu, Chi-Fan Wen, Shih-Peng Lin, Jia-Horng Materials (Basel) Article In order to solve the incompatibility between high porosity and mechanical properties, this study fabricates bone scaffolds by combining braids and sodium alginate (SA) membranes. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plied yarns are braided into hollow, porous three dimensional (3D) PET braids, which are then immersed in SA solution, followed by cross-linking with calcium chloride (CaCl(2)) and drying, to form PET bone scaffolds. Next, SA membranes are rolled and then inserted into the braids to form the spiral and porous PET/SA bone scaffolds. Samples are finally evaluated for surface observation, porosity, water contact angle, compressive strength, and MTT assay. The test results show that the PET bone scaffolds and PET/SA bone scaffolds both have good hydrophilicity. An increasing number of layers and an increasing CaCl(2) concentration cause the messy, loose surface structure to become neat and compact, which, in turn, decreases the porosity and increases the compressive strength. The MTT assay results show that the cell viability of differing SA membranes is beyond 100%, indicating that the PET/SA bone scaffolds containing SA membranes are biocompatible for cell attachment and proliferation. MDPI 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5458857/ /pubmed/28793744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8125488 Text en © 2015 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lou, Ching-Wen
Huang, Chien-Lin
Chen, Chih-Kuang
Liu, Chi-Fan
Wen, Shih-Peng
Lin, Jia-Horng
Effect of Different Manufacturing Methods on the Conflict between Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Spiral and Porous Polyethylene Terephthalate/Sodium Alginate Bone Scaffolds
title Effect of Different Manufacturing Methods on the Conflict between Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Spiral and Porous Polyethylene Terephthalate/Sodium Alginate Bone Scaffolds
title_full Effect of Different Manufacturing Methods on the Conflict between Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Spiral and Porous Polyethylene Terephthalate/Sodium Alginate Bone Scaffolds
title_fullStr Effect of Different Manufacturing Methods on the Conflict between Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Spiral and Porous Polyethylene Terephthalate/Sodium Alginate Bone Scaffolds
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Manufacturing Methods on the Conflict between Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Spiral and Porous Polyethylene Terephthalate/Sodium Alginate Bone Scaffolds
title_short Effect of Different Manufacturing Methods on the Conflict between Porosity and Mechanical Properties of Spiral and Porous Polyethylene Terephthalate/Sodium Alginate Bone Scaffolds
title_sort effect of different manufacturing methods on the conflict between porosity and mechanical properties of spiral and porous polyethylene terephthalate/sodium alginate bone scaffolds
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5458857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28793744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8125488
work_keys_str_mv AT louchingwen effectofdifferentmanufacturingmethodsontheconflictbetweenporosityandmechanicalpropertiesofspiralandporouspolyethyleneterephthalatesodiumalginatebonescaffolds
AT huangchienlin effectofdifferentmanufacturingmethodsontheconflictbetweenporosityandmechanicalpropertiesofspiralandporouspolyethyleneterephthalatesodiumalginatebonescaffolds
AT chenchihkuang effectofdifferentmanufacturingmethodsontheconflictbetweenporosityandmechanicalpropertiesofspiralandporouspolyethyleneterephthalatesodiumalginatebonescaffolds
AT liuchifan effectofdifferentmanufacturingmethodsontheconflictbetweenporosityandmechanicalpropertiesofspiralandporouspolyethyleneterephthalatesodiumalginatebonescaffolds
AT wenshihpeng effectofdifferentmanufacturingmethodsontheconflictbetweenporosityandmechanicalpropertiesofspiralandporouspolyethyleneterephthalatesodiumalginatebonescaffolds
AT linjiahorng effectofdifferentmanufacturingmethodsontheconflictbetweenporosityandmechanicalpropertiesofspiralandporouspolyethyleneterephthalatesodiumalginatebonescaffolds