Cargando…

Continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: The patient’s perspective across secondary and primary care settings

BACKGROUND: Although patients may experience a quick recovery followed by rapid discharge after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), continuity of care from hospital to home can be particularly challenging. Despite this fact, little is known about the experiences of care across the interface...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valaker, Irene, Norekvål, Tone M., Råholm, Maj-Britt, Nordrehaug, Jan Erik, Rotevatn, Svein, Fridlund, Bengt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5458873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28111970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474515117690298
_version_ 1783241843163529216
author Valaker, Irene
Norekvål, Tone M.
Råholm, Maj-Britt
Nordrehaug, Jan Erik
Rotevatn, Svein
Fridlund, Bengt
author_facet Valaker, Irene
Norekvål, Tone M.
Råholm, Maj-Britt
Nordrehaug, Jan Erik
Rotevatn, Svein
Fridlund, Bengt
author_sort Valaker, Irene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although patients may experience a quick recovery followed by rapid discharge after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), continuity of care from hospital to home can be particularly challenging. Despite this fact, little is known about the experiences of care across the interface between secondary and primary healthcare systems in patients undergoing PCI. AIM: To explore how patients undergoing PCI experience continuity of care between secondary and primary care settings after early discharge. METHODS: The study used an inductive exploratory design by performing in-depth interviews of 22 patients at 6–8 weeks after PCI. Nine were women and 13 were men; 13 were older than 67 years of age. Eight lived remotely from the PCI centre. Patients were purposively recruited from the Norwegian Registry for Invasive Cardiology. Interviews were analysed by qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS: Patients undergoing PCI were satisfied with the technical treatment. However, patients experienced an unplanned patient journey across care boundaries. They were not receiving adequate instruction and information on how to integrate health information. Patients also needed help to facilitate connections to community-based resources and to schedule clear follow-up appointments. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: As high-technology treatment dramatically expands, healthcare organisations need to be concerned about all dimensions of continuity. Patients are witnessing their own processes of healthcare delivery and therefore their voices should be taken into greater account when discussing continuity of care. Nurse-led initiatives to improve continuity of care involve a range of interventions at different levels of the healthcare system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5458873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54588732017-06-15 Continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: The patient’s perspective across secondary and primary care settings Valaker, Irene Norekvål, Tone M. Råholm, Maj-Britt Nordrehaug, Jan Erik Rotevatn, Svein Fridlund, Bengt Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Original Articles BACKGROUND: Although patients may experience a quick recovery followed by rapid discharge after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), continuity of care from hospital to home can be particularly challenging. Despite this fact, little is known about the experiences of care across the interface between secondary and primary healthcare systems in patients undergoing PCI. AIM: To explore how patients undergoing PCI experience continuity of care between secondary and primary care settings after early discharge. METHODS: The study used an inductive exploratory design by performing in-depth interviews of 22 patients at 6–8 weeks after PCI. Nine were women and 13 were men; 13 were older than 67 years of age. Eight lived remotely from the PCI centre. Patients were purposively recruited from the Norwegian Registry for Invasive Cardiology. Interviews were analysed by qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS: Patients undergoing PCI were satisfied with the technical treatment. However, patients experienced an unplanned patient journey across care boundaries. They were not receiving adequate instruction and information on how to integrate health information. Patients also needed help to facilitate connections to community-based resources and to schedule clear follow-up appointments. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: As high-technology treatment dramatically expands, healthcare organisations need to be concerned about all dimensions of continuity. Patients are witnessing their own processes of healthcare delivery and therefore their voices should be taken into greater account when discussing continuity of care. Nurse-led initiatives to improve continuity of care involve a range of interventions at different levels of the healthcare system. SAGE Publications 2017-01-01 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5458873/ /pubmed/28111970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474515117690298 Text en © The European Society of Cardiology 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Valaker, Irene
Norekvål, Tone M.
Råholm, Maj-Britt
Nordrehaug, Jan Erik
Rotevatn, Svein
Fridlund, Bengt
Continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: The patient’s perspective across secondary and primary care settings
title Continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: The patient’s perspective across secondary and primary care settings
title_full Continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: The patient’s perspective across secondary and primary care settings
title_fullStr Continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: The patient’s perspective across secondary and primary care settings
title_full_unstemmed Continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: The patient’s perspective across secondary and primary care settings
title_short Continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: The patient’s perspective across secondary and primary care settings
title_sort continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: the patient’s perspective across secondary and primary care settings
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5458873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28111970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474515117690298
work_keys_str_mv AT valakerirene continuityofcareafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionthepatientsperspectiveacrosssecondaryandprimarycaresettings
AT norekvaltonem continuityofcareafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionthepatientsperspectiveacrosssecondaryandprimarycaresettings
AT raholmmajbritt continuityofcareafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionthepatientsperspectiveacrosssecondaryandprimarycaresettings
AT nordrehaugjanerik continuityofcareafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionthepatientsperspectiveacrosssecondaryandprimarycaresettings
AT rotevatnsvein continuityofcareafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionthepatientsperspectiveacrosssecondaryandprimarycaresettings
AT fridlundbengt continuityofcareafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionthepatientsperspectiveacrosssecondaryandprimarycaresettings
AT continuityofcareafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionthepatientsperspectiveacrosssecondaryandprimarycaresettings