Cargando…

A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation

The relationships between the fatigue crack growth rate [Formula: see text] and stress intensity factor range [Formula: see text] are not always linear even in the Paris region. The stress ratio effects on fatigue crack growth rate are diverse in different materials. However, most existing fatigue c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hongxun, Zhang, Weifang, Sun, Fuqiang, Zhang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772906
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10050543
_version_ 1783241898847109120
author Wang, Hongxun
Zhang, Weifang
Sun, Fuqiang
Zhang, Wei
author_facet Wang, Hongxun
Zhang, Weifang
Sun, Fuqiang
Zhang, Wei
author_sort Wang, Hongxun
collection PubMed
description The relationships between the fatigue crack growth rate [Formula: see text] and stress intensity factor range [Formula: see text] are not always linear even in the Paris region. The stress ratio effects on fatigue crack growth rate are diverse in different materials. However, most existing fatigue crack growth models cannot handle these nonlinearities appropriately. The machine learning method provides a flexible approach to the modeling of fatigue crack growth because of its excellent nonlinear approximation and multivariable learning ability. In this paper, a fatigue crack growth calculation method is proposed based on three different machine learning algorithms (MLAs): extreme learning machine (ELM), radial basis function network (RBFN) and genetic algorithms optimized back propagation network (GABP). The MLA based method is validated using testing data of different materials. The three MLAs are compared with each other as well as the classical two-parameter model ([Formula: see text] approach). The results show that the predictions of MLAs are superior to those of [Formula: see text] approach in accuracy and effectiveness, and the ELM based algorithms show overall the best agreement with the experimental data out of the three MLAs, for its global optimization and extrapolation ability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5459084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54590842017-07-28 A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation Wang, Hongxun Zhang, Weifang Sun, Fuqiang Zhang, Wei Materials (Basel) Article The relationships between the fatigue crack growth rate [Formula: see text] and stress intensity factor range [Formula: see text] are not always linear even in the Paris region. The stress ratio effects on fatigue crack growth rate are diverse in different materials. However, most existing fatigue crack growth models cannot handle these nonlinearities appropriately. The machine learning method provides a flexible approach to the modeling of fatigue crack growth because of its excellent nonlinear approximation and multivariable learning ability. In this paper, a fatigue crack growth calculation method is proposed based on three different machine learning algorithms (MLAs): extreme learning machine (ELM), radial basis function network (RBFN) and genetic algorithms optimized back propagation network (GABP). The MLA based method is validated using testing data of different materials. The three MLAs are compared with each other as well as the classical two-parameter model ([Formula: see text] approach). The results show that the predictions of MLAs are superior to those of [Formula: see text] approach in accuracy and effectiveness, and the ELM based algorithms show overall the best agreement with the experimental data out of the three MLAs, for its global optimization and extrapolation ability. MDPI 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5459084/ /pubmed/28772906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10050543 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Hongxun
Zhang, Weifang
Sun, Fuqiang
Zhang, Wei
A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation
title A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation
title_full A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation
title_fullStr A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation
title_short A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation
title_sort comparison study of machine learning based algorithms for fatigue crack growth calculation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772906
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10050543
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghongxun acomparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation
AT zhangweifang acomparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation
AT sunfuqiang acomparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation
AT zhangwei acomparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation
AT wanghongxun comparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation
AT zhangweifang comparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation
AT sunfuqiang comparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation
AT zhangwei comparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation