Cargando…
A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation
The relationships between the fatigue crack growth rate [Formula: see text] and stress intensity factor range [Formula: see text] are not always linear even in the Paris region. The stress ratio effects on fatigue crack growth rate are diverse in different materials. However, most existing fatigue c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10050543 |
_version_ | 1783241898847109120 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Hongxun Zhang, Weifang Sun, Fuqiang Zhang, Wei |
author_facet | Wang, Hongxun Zhang, Weifang Sun, Fuqiang Zhang, Wei |
author_sort | Wang, Hongxun |
collection | PubMed |
description | The relationships between the fatigue crack growth rate [Formula: see text] and stress intensity factor range [Formula: see text] are not always linear even in the Paris region. The stress ratio effects on fatigue crack growth rate are diverse in different materials. However, most existing fatigue crack growth models cannot handle these nonlinearities appropriately. The machine learning method provides a flexible approach to the modeling of fatigue crack growth because of its excellent nonlinear approximation and multivariable learning ability. In this paper, a fatigue crack growth calculation method is proposed based on three different machine learning algorithms (MLAs): extreme learning machine (ELM), radial basis function network (RBFN) and genetic algorithms optimized back propagation network (GABP). The MLA based method is validated using testing data of different materials. The three MLAs are compared with each other as well as the classical two-parameter model ([Formula: see text] approach). The results show that the predictions of MLAs are superior to those of [Formula: see text] approach in accuracy and effectiveness, and the ELM based algorithms show overall the best agreement with the experimental data out of the three MLAs, for its global optimization and extrapolation ability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5459084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54590842017-07-28 A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation Wang, Hongxun Zhang, Weifang Sun, Fuqiang Zhang, Wei Materials (Basel) Article The relationships between the fatigue crack growth rate [Formula: see text] and stress intensity factor range [Formula: see text] are not always linear even in the Paris region. The stress ratio effects on fatigue crack growth rate are diverse in different materials. However, most existing fatigue crack growth models cannot handle these nonlinearities appropriately. The machine learning method provides a flexible approach to the modeling of fatigue crack growth because of its excellent nonlinear approximation and multivariable learning ability. In this paper, a fatigue crack growth calculation method is proposed based on three different machine learning algorithms (MLAs): extreme learning machine (ELM), radial basis function network (RBFN) and genetic algorithms optimized back propagation network (GABP). The MLA based method is validated using testing data of different materials. The three MLAs are compared with each other as well as the classical two-parameter model ([Formula: see text] approach). The results show that the predictions of MLAs are superior to those of [Formula: see text] approach in accuracy and effectiveness, and the ELM based algorithms show overall the best agreement with the experimental data out of the three MLAs, for its global optimization and extrapolation ability. MDPI 2017-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5459084/ /pubmed/28772906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10050543 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Hongxun Zhang, Weifang Sun, Fuqiang Zhang, Wei A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation |
title | A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation |
title_full | A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation |
title_fullStr | A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation |
title_short | A Comparison Study of Machine Learning Based Algorithms for Fatigue Crack Growth Calculation |
title_sort | comparison study of machine learning based algorithms for fatigue crack growth calculation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10050543 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghongxun acomparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation AT zhangweifang acomparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation AT sunfuqiang acomparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation AT zhangwei acomparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation AT wanghongxun comparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation AT zhangweifang comparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation AT sunfuqiang comparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation AT zhangwei comparisonstudyofmachinelearningbasedalgorithmsforfatiguecrackgrowthcalculation |