Cargando…

Assessment of treatment patterns associated with injectable disease-modifying therapy among relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND: Availability of oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) may affect injectable DMT (iDMT) treatment patterns. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to evaluate iDMT persistency, reasons for persistency lapses, and outcomes among newly dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicholas, J, Ko, JJ, Park, Y, Navaratnam, P, Friedman, HS, Ernst, FR, Herrera, V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28607751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217317696114
_version_ 1783241942433267712
author Nicholas, J
Ko, JJ
Park, Y
Navaratnam, P
Friedman, HS
Ernst, FR
Herrera, V
author_facet Nicholas, J
Ko, JJ
Park, Y
Navaratnam, P
Friedman, HS
Ernst, FR
Herrera, V
author_sort Nicholas, J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Availability of oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) may affect injectable DMT (iDMT) treatment patterns. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to evaluate iDMT persistency, reasons for persistency lapses, and outcomes among newly diagnosed RRMS patients. METHODS: Medical records of 300 RRMS patients initiated on iDMT between 2008 and 2013 were abstracted from 18 US-based neurology clinics. Eligible patients had ≥3 visits: pre-iDMT initiation, iDMT initiation (index), and ≥1 visit within 24 months post-index. MS-related symptoms, relapses, iDMT treatment patterns (i.e. persistency, discontinuation, switching, and restart), and reasons for non-persistency were tracked for 24 months. RESULTS: At 24 months, iDMT persistency was 61.0%; 28.0% of patients switched to another DMT, 8.0% discontinued, and 3.0% stopped and restarted the same iDMT. The most commonly identified reasons for non-persistency were perceived lack of efficacy (22.2%), adverse events (18.8%), and fear of needles/self-injecting (9.4%). At 24 months, 38.0% of patients had experienced a relapse and 11.0% had changes in MRI lesion counts. Patients without MS-related symptoms at index reported increases in the incidence of these symptoms at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Non-persistency with iDMT remains an issue in the oral DMT age. Many patients still experienced relapses and disease progression, and should consider switching to more effective therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5459267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54592672017-06-12 Assessment of treatment patterns associated with injectable disease-modifying therapy among relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients Nicholas, J Ko, JJ Park, Y Navaratnam, P Friedman, HS Ernst, FR Herrera, V Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Original Article BACKGROUND: Availability of oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) may affect injectable DMT (iDMT) treatment patterns. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to evaluate iDMT persistency, reasons for persistency lapses, and outcomes among newly diagnosed RRMS patients. METHODS: Medical records of 300 RRMS patients initiated on iDMT between 2008 and 2013 were abstracted from 18 US-based neurology clinics. Eligible patients had ≥3 visits: pre-iDMT initiation, iDMT initiation (index), and ≥1 visit within 24 months post-index. MS-related symptoms, relapses, iDMT treatment patterns (i.e. persistency, discontinuation, switching, and restart), and reasons for non-persistency were tracked for 24 months. RESULTS: At 24 months, iDMT persistency was 61.0%; 28.0% of patients switched to another DMT, 8.0% discontinued, and 3.0% stopped and restarted the same iDMT. The most commonly identified reasons for non-persistency were perceived lack of efficacy (22.2%), adverse events (18.8%), and fear of needles/self-injecting (9.4%). At 24 months, 38.0% of patients had experienced a relapse and 11.0% had changes in MRI lesion counts. Patients without MS-related symptoms at index reported increases in the incidence of these symptoms at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Non-persistency with iDMT remains an issue in the oral DMT age. Many patients still experienced relapses and disease progression, and should consider switching to more effective therapies. SAGE Publications 2017-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5459267/ /pubmed/28607751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217317696114 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nicholas, J
Ko, JJ
Park, Y
Navaratnam, P
Friedman, HS
Ernst, FR
Herrera, V
Assessment of treatment patterns associated with injectable disease-modifying therapy among relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients
title Assessment of treatment patterns associated with injectable disease-modifying therapy among relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients
title_full Assessment of treatment patterns associated with injectable disease-modifying therapy among relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients
title_fullStr Assessment of treatment patterns associated with injectable disease-modifying therapy among relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of treatment patterns associated with injectable disease-modifying therapy among relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients
title_short Assessment of treatment patterns associated with injectable disease-modifying therapy among relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients
title_sort assessment of treatment patterns associated with injectable disease-modifying therapy among relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28607751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217317696114
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasj assessmentoftreatmentpatternsassociatedwithinjectablediseasemodifyingtherapyamongrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients
AT kojj assessmentoftreatmentpatternsassociatedwithinjectablediseasemodifyingtherapyamongrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients
AT parky assessmentoftreatmentpatternsassociatedwithinjectablediseasemodifyingtherapyamongrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients
AT navaratnamp assessmentoftreatmentpatternsassociatedwithinjectablediseasemodifyingtherapyamongrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients
AT friedmanhs assessmentoftreatmentpatternsassociatedwithinjectablediseasemodifyingtherapyamongrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients
AT ernstfr assessmentoftreatmentpatternsassociatedwithinjectablediseasemodifyingtherapyamongrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients
AT herrerav assessmentoftreatmentpatternsassociatedwithinjectablediseasemodifyingtherapyamongrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosispatients