Cargando…

Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings

BACKGROUND: Cough is the most common symptom presenting to doctors. The quality of cough (productive or wet vs dry) is used clinically as well as in epidemiology and clinical research. There is however no data on the validity of cough quality descriptors. The study aims were to compare (1) cough qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Anne Bernadette, Gaffney, Justin Thomas, Eastburn, Matthew Michael, Faoagali, Joan, Cox, Nancy C, Masters, Ian Brent
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15638942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-3
_version_ 1782122219515674624
author Chang, Anne Bernadette
Gaffney, Justin Thomas
Eastburn, Matthew Michael
Faoagali, Joan
Cox, Nancy C
Masters, Ian Brent
author_facet Chang, Anne Bernadette
Gaffney, Justin Thomas
Eastburn, Matthew Michael
Faoagali, Joan
Cox, Nancy C
Masters, Ian Brent
author_sort Chang, Anne Bernadette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cough is the most common symptom presenting to doctors. The quality of cough (productive or wet vs dry) is used clinically as well as in epidemiology and clinical research. There is however no data on the validity of cough quality descriptors. The study aims were to compare (1) cough quality (wet/dry and brassy/non-brassy) to bronchoscopic findings of secretions and tracheomalacia respectively and, (2) parent's vs clinician's evaluation of the cough quality (wet/dry). METHODS: Cough quality of children (without a known underlying respiratory disease) undergoing elective bronchoscopy was independently evaluated by clinicians and parents. A 'blinded' clinician scored the secretions seen at bronchoscopy on pre-determined criteria and graded (1 to 6). Kappa (K) statistics was used for agreement, and inter-rater and intra-rater agreement examined on digitally recorded cough. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine if cough quality related to amount of airway secretions present at bronchoscopy. RESULTS: Median age of the 106 children (62 boys, 44 girls) enrolled was 2.6 years (IQR 5.7). Parent's assessment of cough quality (wet/dry) agreed with clinicians' (K = 0.75, 95%CI 0.58–0.93). When compared to bronchoscopy (bronchoscopic secretion grade 4), clinicians' cough assessment had the highest sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) and were marginally better than parent(s). The area under the ROC curve was 0.85 (95%CI 0.77–0.92). Intra-observer (K = 1.0) and inter-clinician agreement for wet/dry cough (K = 0.88, 95%CI 0.82–0.94) was very good. Weighted K for inter-rater agreement for bronchoscopic secretion grades was 0.95 (95%CI 0.87–1). Sensitivity and specificity for brassy cough (for tracheomalacia) were 0.57 and 0.81 respectively. K for both intra and inter-observer clinician agreement for brassy cough was 0.79 (95%CI 0.73–0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Dry and wet cough in children, as determined by clinicians and parents has good clinical validity. Clinicians should however be cognisant that children with dry cough may have minimal to mild airway secretions. Brassy cough determined by respiratory physicians is highly specific for tracheomalacia.
format Text
id pubmed-545936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5459362005-01-28 Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings Chang, Anne Bernadette Gaffney, Justin Thomas Eastburn, Matthew Michael Faoagali, Joan Cox, Nancy C Masters, Ian Brent Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Cough is the most common symptom presenting to doctors. The quality of cough (productive or wet vs dry) is used clinically as well as in epidemiology and clinical research. There is however no data on the validity of cough quality descriptors. The study aims were to compare (1) cough quality (wet/dry and brassy/non-brassy) to bronchoscopic findings of secretions and tracheomalacia respectively and, (2) parent's vs clinician's evaluation of the cough quality (wet/dry). METHODS: Cough quality of children (without a known underlying respiratory disease) undergoing elective bronchoscopy was independently evaluated by clinicians and parents. A 'blinded' clinician scored the secretions seen at bronchoscopy on pre-determined criteria and graded (1 to 6). Kappa (K) statistics was used for agreement, and inter-rater and intra-rater agreement examined on digitally recorded cough. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine if cough quality related to amount of airway secretions present at bronchoscopy. RESULTS: Median age of the 106 children (62 boys, 44 girls) enrolled was 2.6 years (IQR 5.7). Parent's assessment of cough quality (wet/dry) agreed with clinicians' (K = 0.75, 95%CI 0.58–0.93). When compared to bronchoscopy (bronchoscopic secretion grade 4), clinicians' cough assessment had the highest sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) and were marginally better than parent(s). The area under the ROC curve was 0.85 (95%CI 0.77–0.92). Intra-observer (K = 1.0) and inter-clinician agreement for wet/dry cough (K = 0.88, 95%CI 0.82–0.94) was very good. Weighted K for inter-rater agreement for bronchoscopic secretion grades was 0.95 (95%CI 0.87–1). Sensitivity and specificity for brassy cough (for tracheomalacia) were 0.57 and 0.81 respectively. K for both intra and inter-observer clinician agreement for brassy cough was 0.79 (95%CI 0.73–0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Dry and wet cough in children, as determined by clinicians and parents has good clinical validity. Clinicians should however be cognisant that children with dry cough may have minimal to mild airway secretions. Brassy cough determined by respiratory physicians is highly specific for tracheomalacia. BioMed Central 2005 2005-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC545936/ /pubmed/15638942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-3 Text en Copyright © 2005 Chang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Chang, Anne Bernadette
Gaffney, Justin Thomas
Eastburn, Matthew Michael
Faoagali, Joan
Cox, Nancy C
Masters, Ian Brent
Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title_full Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title_fullStr Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title_full_unstemmed Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title_short Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
title_sort cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15638942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-3
work_keys_str_mv AT changannebernadette coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
AT gaffneyjustinthomas coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
AT eastburnmatthewmichael coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
AT faoagalijoan coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
AT coxnancyc coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings
AT mastersianbrent coughqualityinchildrenacomparisonofsubjectivevsbronchoscopicfindings