Cargando…
Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon)
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported favorable outcomes using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. However, the treatment effect compared with an uncoated balloon has differed greatly among the ran...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026493 |
_version_ | 1783241994091364352 |
---|---|
author | Schroeder, Henrik Werner, Martin Meyer, Dirk-Roelfs Reimer, Peter Krüger, Karsten Jaff, Michael R. Brodmann, Marianne |
author_facet | Schroeder, Henrik Werner, Martin Meyer, Dirk-Roelfs Reimer, Peter Krüger, Karsten Jaff, Michael R. Brodmann, Marianne |
author_sort | Schroeder, Henrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported favorable outcomes using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. However, the treatment effect compared with an uncoated balloon has differed greatly among the randomized trials, with better outcomes observed with higher-dose DCBs. This European trial was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a next-generation low-dose (2-µg/mm(2) surface dose of paclitaxel) DCB. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial. Patients were randomized (3:1) to treatment with a low-dose DCB or an uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon. The primary safety end point was a composite of freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days after the procedure and freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months after the procedure. The primary effectiveness end point was primary patency at 12 months. RESULTS: Patients were randomized to treatment with a DCB (222 patients, 254 lesions) or uncoated PTA balloon (72 patients, 79 lesions) after successful predilatation. Mean lesion length was 7.2 and 7.1 cm, and 19.2% and 19.0% of lesions represented total occlusions, respectively. The primary safety end point was met, and superiority was demonstrated; freedom from a primary safety event was 94.1% (193 of 205) with DCB and 83.3% (50 of 60) with PTA, for a difference of 10.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.9%–23.0%). The primary effectiveness end point was met, and superiority of DCB over PTA was achieved (83.9% [188 of 224] versus 60.6% [40 of 66]; P<0.001). Outcomes with DCB were also superior to PTA per the Kaplan-Meier estimate for primary patency (89.0% versus 65.0% at 365 days; log-rank P<0.001) and for rates of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (5.9% versus 16.7%; P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Superiority with a low-dose DCB for femoropopliteal interventions was demonstrated over PTA for both the safety and effectiveness end points. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01858363. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5459585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54595852017-06-13 Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon) Schroeder, Henrik Werner, Martin Meyer, Dirk-Roelfs Reimer, Peter Krüger, Karsten Jaff, Michael R. Brodmann, Marianne Circulation Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported favorable outcomes using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. However, the treatment effect compared with an uncoated balloon has differed greatly among the randomized trials, with better outcomes observed with higher-dose DCBs. This European trial was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a next-generation low-dose (2-µg/mm(2) surface dose of paclitaxel) DCB. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial. Patients were randomized (3:1) to treatment with a low-dose DCB or an uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon. The primary safety end point was a composite of freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days after the procedure and freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months after the procedure. The primary effectiveness end point was primary patency at 12 months. RESULTS: Patients were randomized to treatment with a DCB (222 patients, 254 lesions) or uncoated PTA balloon (72 patients, 79 lesions) after successful predilatation. Mean lesion length was 7.2 and 7.1 cm, and 19.2% and 19.0% of lesions represented total occlusions, respectively. The primary safety end point was met, and superiority was demonstrated; freedom from a primary safety event was 94.1% (193 of 205) with DCB and 83.3% (50 of 60) with PTA, for a difference of 10.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.9%–23.0%). The primary effectiveness end point was met, and superiority of DCB over PTA was achieved (83.9% [188 of 224] versus 60.6% [40 of 66]; P<0.001). Outcomes with DCB were also superior to PTA per the Kaplan-Meier estimate for primary patency (89.0% versus 65.0% at 365 days; log-rank P<0.001) and for rates of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (5.9% versus 16.7%; P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Superiority with a low-dose DCB for femoropopliteal interventions was demonstrated over PTA for both the safety and effectiveness end points. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01858363. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-06-06 2017-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5459585/ /pubmed/28424223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026493 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Circulation is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Schroeder, Henrik Werner, Martin Meyer, Dirk-Roelfs Reimer, Peter Krüger, Karsten Jaff, Michael R. Brodmann, Marianne Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon) |
title | Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon) |
title_full | Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon) |
title_fullStr | Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon) |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon) |
title_short | Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon) |
title_sort | low-dose paclitaxel–coated versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease: one-year results of the illumenate european randomized clinical trial (randomized trial of a novel paclitaxel-coated percutaneous angioplasty balloon) |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schroederhenrik lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon AT wernermartin lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon AT meyerdirkroelfs lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon AT reimerpeter lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon AT krugerkarsten lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon AT jaffmichaelr lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon AT brodmannmarianne lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon |