Cargando…

Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon)

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported favorable outcomes using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. However, the treatment effect compared with an uncoated balloon has differed greatly among the ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schroeder, Henrik, Werner, Martin, Meyer, Dirk-Roelfs, Reimer, Peter, Krüger, Karsten, Jaff, Michael R., Brodmann, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026493
_version_ 1783241994091364352
author Schroeder, Henrik
Werner, Martin
Meyer, Dirk-Roelfs
Reimer, Peter
Krüger, Karsten
Jaff, Michael R.
Brodmann, Marianne
author_facet Schroeder, Henrik
Werner, Martin
Meyer, Dirk-Roelfs
Reimer, Peter
Krüger, Karsten
Jaff, Michael R.
Brodmann, Marianne
author_sort Schroeder, Henrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported favorable outcomes using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. However, the treatment effect compared with an uncoated balloon has differed greatly among the randomized trials, with better outcomes observed with higher-dose DCBs. This European trial was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a next-generation low-dose (2-µg/mm(2) surface dose of paclitaxel) DCB. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial. Patients were randomized (3:1) to treatment with a low-dose DCB or an uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon. The primary safety end point was a composite of freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days after the procedure and freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months after the procedure. The primary effectiveness end point was primary patency at 12 months. RESULTS: Patients were randomized to treatment with a DCB (222 patients, 254 lesions) or uncoated PTA balloon (72 patients, 79 lesions) after successful predilatation. Mean lesion length was 7.2 and 7.1 cm, and 19.2% and 19.0% of lesions represented total occlusions, respectively. The primary safety end point was met, and superiority was demonstrated; freedom from a primary safety event was 94.1% (193 of 205) with DCB and 83.3% (50 of 60) with PTA, for a difference of 10.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.9%–23.0%). The primary effectiveness end point was met, and superiority of DCB over PTA was achieved (83.9% [188 of 224] versus 60.6% [40 of 66]; P<0.001). Outcomes with DCB were also superior to PTA per the Kaplan-Meier estimate for primary patency (89.0% versus 65.0% at 365 days; log-rank P<0.001) and for rates of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (5.9% versus 16.7%; P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Superiority with a low-dose DCB for femoropopliteal interventions was demonstrated over PTA for both the safety and effectiveness end points. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01858363.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5459585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54595852017-06-13 Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon) Schroeder, Henrik Werner, Martin Meyer, Dirk-Roelfs Reimer, Peter Krüger, Karsten Jaff, Michael R. Brodmann, Marianne Circulation Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported favorable outcomes using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. However, the treatment effect compared with an uncoated balloon has differed greatly among the randomized trials, with better outcomes observed with higher-dose DCBs. This European trial was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a next-generation low-dose (2-µg/mm(2) surface dose of paclitaxel) DCB. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial. Patients were randomized (3:1) to treatment with a low-dose DCB or an uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon. The primary safety end point was a composite of freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days after the procedure and freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 12 months after the procedure. The primary effectiveness end point was primary patency at 12 months. RESULTS: Patients were randomized to treatment with a DCB (222 patients, 254 lesions) or uncoated PTA balloon (72 patients, 79 lesions) after successful predilatation. Mean lesion length was 7.2 and 7.1 cm, and 19.2% and 19.0% of lesions represented total occlusions, respectively. The primary safety end point was met, and superiority was demonstrated; freedom from a primary safety event was 94.1% (193 of 205) with DCB and 83.3% (50 of 60) with PTA, for a difference of 10.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.9%–23.0%). The primary effectiveness end point was met, and superiority of DCB over PTA was achieved (83.9% [188 of 224] versus 60.6% [40 of 66]; P<0.001). Outcomes with DCB were also superior to PTA per the Kaplan-Meier estimate for primary patency (89.0% versus 65.0% at 365 days; log-rank P<0.001) and for rates of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (5.9% versus 16.7%; P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Superiority with a low-dose DCB for femoropopliteal interventions was demonstrated over PTA for both the safety and effectiveness end points. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01858363. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-06-06 2017-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5459585/ /pubmed/28424223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026493 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Circulation is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Schroeder, Henrik
Werner, Martin
Meyer, Dirk-Roelfs
Reimer, Peter
Krüger, Karsten
Jaff, Michael R.
Brodmann, Marianne
Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon)
title Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon)
title_full Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon)
title_fullStr Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon)
title_full_unstemmed Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon)
title_short Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease: One-Year Results of the ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial (Randomized Trial of a Novel Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Angioplasty Balloon)
title_sort low-dose paclitaxel–coated versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease: one-year results of the illumenate european randomized clinical trial (randomized trial of a novel paclitaxel-coated percutaneous angioplasty balloon)
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026493
work_keys_str_mv AT schroederhenrik lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon
AT wernermartin lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon
AT meyerdirkroelfs lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon
AT reimerpeter lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon
AT krugerkarsten lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon
AT jaffmichaelr lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon
AT brodmannmarianne lowdosepaclitaxelcoatedversusuncoatedpercutaneoustransluminalballoonangioplastyforfemoropoplitealperipheralarterydiseaseoneyearresultsoftheillumenateeuropeanrandomizedclinicaltrialrandomizedtrialofanovelpaclitaxelcoatedpercutaneousangioplastyballoon