Cargando…

Contralateral Augmentation with a Transmidline Scarless Technique During Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Implants

BACKGROUND: Unilateral breast reconstruction can be a challenge when attempting to achieve an aesthetically pleasing and symmetrical breast mound on the contralateral side. This study investigates the outcomes of using a contralateral augmentation transmidline scarless (CATS) technique to simultaneo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Olivia A., Lin, Yi-Ling, Huang, Jung-Ju, Cheng, Ming-Huei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28607846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001298
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Unilateral breast reconstruction can be a challenge when attempting to achieve an aesthetically pleasing and symmetrical breast mound on the contralateral side. This study investigates the outcomes of using a contralateral augmentation transmidline scarless (CATS) technique to simultaneously augment the contralateral breast using implants. METHODS: Between January 2004 and July 2016, patients undergoing unilateral implant-based breast reconstruction and simultaneous contralateral implant augmentation using a transmidline access were studied. Characteristics and complications using this technique were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-five (91.5%) of 71 patients used the CATS technique for unilateral breast reconstruction using implants with contralateral breast implant augmentation. The remaining 6 cases used a preexisting chest scar. In the assessment of complication rates between the reconstructed and augmented sides, the reconstructed side had a statistically significant higher rate of implant exposure (P = 0.04) and total complications (P = 0.02). In comparing the revision rates between these 2 groups, the need for implant change (P = 0.04) and the total revision rates (P = 0.01) were higher in the reconstructive side. Use of saline implants had a higher rate of chest wall and breast skin necrosis (P = 0.03) in comparison with silicone implants. There was not a statistically significant difference in complications when comparing timing of reconstructions (immediate versus delayed). CONCLUSIONS: The CATS technique can be performed safely, with a desirable aesthetic outcome, and also symmetry with minimal risk of symmastia during unilateral breast reconstruction using implant-based reconstruction.