Cargando…
Contralateral Augmentation with a Transmidline Scarless Technique During Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Implants
BACKGROUND: Unilateral breast reconstruction can be a challenge when attempting to achieve an aesthetically pleasing and symmetrical breast mound on the contralateral side. This study investigates the outcomes of using a contralateral augmentation transmidline scarless (CATS) technique to simultaneo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28607846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001298 |
_version_ | 1783241995906449408 |
---|---|
author | Ho, Olivia A. Lin, Yi-Ling Huang, Jung-Ju Cheng, Ming-Huei |
author_facet | Ho, Olivia A. Lin, Yi-Ling Huang, Jung-Ju Cheng, Ming-Huei |
author_sort | Ho, Olivia A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Unilateral breast reconstruction can be a challenge when attempting to achieve an aesthetically pleasing and symmetrical breast mound on the contralateral side. This study investigates the outcomes of using a contralateral augmentation transmidline scarless (CATS) technique to simultaneously augment the contralateral breast using implants. METHODS: Between January 2004 and July 2016, patients undergoing unilateral implant-based breast reconstruction and simultaneous contralateral implant augmentation using a transmidline access were studied. Characteristics and complications using this technique were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-five (91.5%) of 71 patients used the CATS technique for unilateral breast reconstruction using implants with contralateral breast implant augmentation. The remaining 6 cases used a preexisting chest scar. In the assessment of complication rates between the reconstructed and augmented sides, the reconstructed side had a statistically significant higher rate of implant exposure (P = 0.04) and total complications (P = 0.02). In comparing the revision rates between these 2 groups, the need for implant change (P = 0.04) and the total revision rates (P = 0.01) were higher in the reconstructive side. Use of saline implants had a higher rate of chest wall and breast skin necrosis (P = 0.03) in comparison with silicone implants. There was not a statistically significant difference in complications when comparing timing of reconstructions (immediate versus delayed). CONCLUSIONS: The CATS technique can be performed safely, with a desirable aesthetic outcome, and also symmetry with minimal risk of symmastia during unilateral breast reconstruction using implant-based reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5459629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54596292017-06-12 Contralateral Augmentation with a Transmidline Scarless Technique During Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Implants Ho, Olivia A. Lin, Yi-Ling Huang, Jung-Ju Cheng, Ming-Huei Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Unilateral breast reconstruction can be a challenge when attempting to achieve an aesthetically pleasing and symmetrical breast mound on the contralateral side. This study investigates the outcomes of using a contralateral augmentation transmidline scarless (CATS) technique to simultaneously augment the contralateral breast using implants. METHODS: Between January 2004 and July 2016, patients undergoing unilateral implant-based breast reconstruction and simultaneous contralateral implant augmentation using a transmidline access were studied. Characteristics and complications using this technique were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-five (91.5%) of 71 patients used the CATS technique for unilateral breast reconstruction using implants with contralateral breast implant augmentation. The remaining 6 cases used a preexisting chest scar. In the assessment of complication rates between the reconstructed and augmented sides, the reconstructed side had a statistically significant higher rate of implant exposure (P = 0.04) and total complications (P = 0.02). In comparing the revision rates between these 2 groups, the need for implant change (P = 0.04) and the total revision rates (P = 0.01) were higher in the reconstructive side. Use of saline implants had a higher rate of chest wall and breast skin necrosis (P = 0.03) in comparison with silicone implants. There was not a statistically significant difference in complications when comparing timing of reconstructions (immediate versus delayed). CONCLUSIONS: The CATS technique can be performed safely, with a desirable aesthetic outcome, and also symmetry with minimal risk of symmastia during unilateral breast reconstruction using implant-based reconstruction. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5459629/ /pubmed/28607846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001298 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ho, Olivia A. Lin, Yi-Ling Huang, Jung-Ju Cheng, Ming-Huei Contralateral Augmentation with a Transmidline Scarless Technique During Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Implants |
title | Contralateral Augmentation with a Transmidline Scarless Technique During Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Implants |
title_full | Contralateral Augmentation with a Transmidline Scarless Technique During Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Implants |
title_fullStr | Contralateral Augmentation with a Transmidline Scarless Technique During Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Contralateral Augmentation with a Transmidline Scarless Technique During Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Implants |
title_short | Contralateral Augmentation with a Transmidline Scarless Technique During Unilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Implants |
title_sort | contralateral augmentation with a transmidline scarless technique during unilateral breast reconstruction using implants |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28607846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hooliviaa contralateralaugmentationwithatransmidlinescarlesstechniqueduringunilateralbreastreconstructionusingimplants AT linyiling contralateralaugmentationwithatransmidlinescarlesstechniqueduringunilateralbreastreconstructionusingimplants AT huangjungju contralateralaugmentationwithatransmidlinescarlesstechniqueduringunilateralbreastreconstructionusingimplants AT chengminghuei contralateralaugmentationwithatransmidlinescarlesstechniqueduringunilateralbreastreconstructionusingimplants |