Cargando…
Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study
Low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis remain frequent problems in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Several guidelines with nonidentical recommendations exist and there is no general agreement regarding the optimal approach for osteoporosis screening in IBD patients. Clinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28562531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006788 |
_version_ | 1783242004624310272 |
---|---|
author | Schüle, Solvey Rossel, Jean-Benoît Frey, Diana Biedermann, Luc Scharl, Michael Zeitz, Jonas Freitas-Queiroz, Natália Kuntzen, Thomas Greuter, Thomas Vavricka, Stephan R. Rogler, Gerhard Misselwitz, Benjamin |
author_facet | Schüle, Solvey Rossel, Jean-Benoît Frey, Diana Biedermann, Luc Scharl, Michael Zeitz, Jonas Freitas-Queiroz, Natália Kuntzen, Thomas Greuter, Thomas Vavricka, Stephan R. Rogler, Gerhard Misselwitz, Benjamin |
author_sort | Schüle, Solvey |
collection | PubMed |
description | Low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis remain frequent problems in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Several guidelines with nonidentical recommendations exist and there is no general agreement regarding the optimal approach for osteoporosis screening in IBD patients. Clinical practice of osteoporosis screening and treatment remains insufficiently investigated. In the year 2014, a chart review of 877 patients included in the Swiss IBD Cohort study was performed to assess details of osteoporosis diagnostics and treatment. BMD measurements, osteoporosis treatment, and IBD medication were recorded. Our chart review revealed 253 dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in 877 IBD patients; osteoporosis was prevalent in 20% of tested patients. We identified widely differing osteoporosis screening rates among centers (11%–62%). A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified predictive factors for screening including steroid usage, long disease duration, and perianal disease; even after correction for all risk factors, the study center remained a strong independent predictor (odds ratio 2.3–21 compared to the center with the lowest screening rate). Treatment rates for patients with osteoporosis were suboptimal (55% for calcium, 65% for vitamin D) at the time of chart review. Similarly, a significant fraction of patients with current steroid medication were not treated with vitamin D or calcium (treatment rates 53% for calcium, 58% for vitamin D). For only 29% of patients with osteoporosis bisphosphonate treatment was started. Treatment rates also differed among centers, generally following screening rates. In patients with longitudinal DXA scans, calcium and vitamin D usage was significantly associated with improvement of BMD over time. Our analysis identified inconsistent usage of osteoporosis screening and underuse of osteoporosis treatment in IBD patients. Increasing awareness of osteoporosis as a significant clinical problem in IBD patients might improve patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5459696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54596962017-06-12 Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study Schüle, Solvey Rossel, Jean-Benoît Frey, Diana Biedermann, Luc Scharl, Michael Zeitz, Jonas Freitas-Queiroz, Natália Kuntzen, Thomas Greuter, Thomas Vavricka, Stephan R. Rogler, Gerhard Misselwitz, Benjamin Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 Low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis remain frequent problems in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Several guidelines with nonidentical recommendations exist and there is no general agreement regarding the optimal approach for osteoporosis screening in IBD patients. Clinical practice of osteoporosis screening and treatment remains insufficiently investigated. In the year 2014, a chart review of 877 patients included in the Swiss IBD Cohort study was performed to assess details of osteoporosis diagnostics and treatment. BMD measurements, osteoporosis treatment, and IBD medication were recorded. Our chart review revealed 253 dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in 877 IBD patients; osteoporosis was prevalent in 20% of tested patients. We identified widely differing osteoporosis screening rates among centers (11%–62%). A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified predictive factors for screening including steroid usage, long disease duration, and perianal disease; even after correction for all risk factors, the study center remained a strong independent predictor (odds ratio 2.3–21 compared to the center with the lowest screening rate). Treatment rates for patients with osteoporosis were suboptimal (55% for calcium, 65% for vitamin D) at the time of chart review. Similarly, a significant fraction of patients with current steroid medication were not treated with vitamin D or calcium (treatment rates 53% for calcium, 58% for vitamin D). For only 29% of patients with osteoporosis bisphosphonate treatment was started. Treatment rates also differed among centers, generally following screening rates. In patients with longitudinal DXA scans, calcium and vitamin D usage was significantly associated with improvement of BMD over time. Our analysis identified inconsistent usage of osteoporosis screening and underuse of osteoporosis treatment in IBD patients. Increasing awareness of osteoporosis as a significant clinical problem in IBD patients might improve patient care. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5459696/ /pubmed/28562531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006788 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4500 Schüle, Solvey Rossel, Jean-Benoît Frey, Diana Biedermann, Luc Scharl, Michael Zeitz, Jonas Freitas-Queiroz, Natália Kuntzen, Thomas Greuter, Thomas Vavricka, Stephan R. Rogler, Gerhard Misselwitz, Benjamin Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study |
title | Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study |
title_full | Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study |
title_fullStr | Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study |
title_short | Widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Swiss IBD cohort study |
title_sort | widely differing screening and treatment practice for osteoporosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the swiss ibd cohort study |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28562531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006788 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schulesolvey widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT rosseljeanbenoit widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT freydiana widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT biedermannluc widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT scharlmichael widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT zeitzjonas widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT freitasqueiroznatalia widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT kuntzenthomas widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT greuterthomas widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT vavrickastephanr widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT roglergerhard widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy AT misselwitzbenjamin widelydifferingscreeningandtreatmentpracticeforosteoporosisinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseasesintheswissibdcohortstudy |