Cargando…
Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making
A central question in cognitive neuroscience is how unitary, coherent decisions at the whole organism level can arise from the distributed behavior of a large population of neurons with only partially overlapping information. We address this issue by studying neural spiking behavior recorded from a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28634436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00313 |
_version_ | 1783242055764410368 |
---|---|
author | Daniels, Bryan C. Flack, Jessica C. Krakauer, David C. |
author_facet | Daniels, Bryan C. Flack, Jessica C. Krakauer, David C. |
author_sort | Daniels, Bryan C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A central question in cognitive neuroscience is how unitary, coherent decisions at the whole organism level can arise from the distributed behavior of a large population of neurons with only partially overlapping information. We address this issue by studying neural spiking behavior recorded from a multielectrode array with 169 channels during a visual motion direction discrimination task. It is well known that in this task there are two distinct phases in neural spiking behavior. Here we show Phase I is a distributed or incompressible phase in which uncertainty about the decision is substantially reduced by pooling information from many cells. Phase II is a redundant or compressible phase in which numerous single cells contain all the information present at the population level in Phase I, such that the firing behavior of a single cell is enough to predict the subject's decision. Using an empirically grounded dynamical modeling framework, we show that in Phase I large cell populations with low redundancy produce a slow timescale of information aggregation through critical slowing down near a symmetry-breaking transition. Our model indicates that increasing collective amplification in Phase II leads naturally to a faster timescale of information pooling and consensus formation. Based on our results and others in the literature, we propose that a general feature of collective computation is a “coding duality” in which there are accumulation and consensus formation processes distinguished by different timescales. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5459926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54599262017-06-20 Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making Daniels, Bryan C. Flack, Jessica C. Krakauer, David C. Front Neurosci Neuroscience A central question in cognitive neuroscience is how unitary, coherent decisions at the whole organism level can arise from the distributed behavior of a large population of neurons with only partially overlapping information. We address this issue by studying neural spiking behavior recorded from a multielectrode array with 169 channels during a visual motion direction discrimination task. It is well known that in this task there are two distinct phases in neural spiking behavior. Here we show Phase I is a distributed or incompressible phase in which uncertainty about the decision is substantially reduced by pooling information from many cells. Phase II is a redundant or compressible phase in which numerous single cells contain all the information present at the population level in Phase I, such that the firing behavior of a single cell is enough to predict the subject's decision. Using an empirically grounded dynamical modeling framework, we show that in Phase I large cell populations with low redundancy produce a slow timescale of information aggregation through critical slowing down near a symmetry-breaking transition. Our model indicates that increasing collective amplification in Phase II leads naturally to a faster timescale of information pooling and consensus formation. Based on our results and others in the literature, we propose that a general feature of collective computation is a “coding duality” in which there are accumulation and consensus formation processes distinguished by different timescales. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5459926/ /pubmed/28634436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00313 Text en Copyright © 2017 Daniels, Flack and Krakauer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Daniels, Bryan C. Flack, Jessica C. Krakauer, David C. Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making |
title | Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making |
title_full | Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making |
title_fullStr | Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making |
title_full_unstemmed | Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making |
title_short | Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making |
title_sort | dual coding theory explains biphasic collective computation in neural decision-making |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28634436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danielsbryanc dualcodingtheoryexplainsbiphasiccollectivecomputationinneuraldecisionmaking AT flackjessicac dualcodingtheoryexplainsbiphasiccollectivecomputationinneuraldecisionmaking AT krakauerdavidc dualcodingtheoryexplainsbiphasiccollectivecomputationinneuraldecisionmaking |