Cargando…

Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a value-based insurance design providing enhanced access to physical therapy (PT) for treatment of back pain on treatment patterns and cost of care. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of claims data obtained from Geisinger Health Plan (GHP). In April 2013, GHP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maeng, Daniel D, Graboski, Anthony, Allison, Peiling L, Fisher, Dorothy Y, Bulger, John B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28615965
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S135813
_version_ 1783242065896800256
author Maeng, Daniel D
Graboski, Anthony
Allison, Peiling L
Fisher, Dorothy Y
Bulger, John B
author_facet Maeng, Daniel D
Graboski, Anthony
Allison, Peiling L
Fisher, Dorothy Y
Bulger, John B
author_sort Maeng, Daniel D
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a value-based insurance design providing enhanced access to physical therapy (PT) for treatment of back pain on treatment patterns and cost of care. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of claims data obtained from Geisinger Health Plan (GHP). In April 2013, GHP began offering “PT bundle” – i.e., a bundle of up to five PT visits for a single one-time copay that can be renewed for another bundle of five PT visits – for its employer-based plan members with back pain. METHODS: A cohort of GHP members who were preauthorized for the PT bundle were compared against a contemporaneous cohort of GHP members who were preauthorized for PT under the standard per-visit copay arrangement between January 2013 and October 2014. RESULTS: Among the PT bundle cohort, the PT visit rate during the first 9 months since the PT preauthorization date had dramatically increased and then gradually decreased in subsequent months. The PT bundle was also associated with 29%–35% short-term reductions in emergency department visits and with 12%–20% reductions in primary care visits after 6 months. No significant impact on hospitalization or cost was observed. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the PT bundle appears to have led to a change in the treatment pattern of back pain that is more consistent with the recommended guidelines to use more conservative management such as PT as the first-line treatment for back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5459966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54599662017-06-14 Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost Maeng, Daniel D Graboski, Anthony Allison, Peiling L Fisher, Dorothy Y Bulger, John B J Pain Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a value-based insurance design providing enhanced access to physical therapy (PT) for treatment of back pain on treatment patterns and cost of care. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of claims data obtained from Geisinger Health Plan (GHP). In April 2013, GHP began offering “PT bundle” – i.e., a bundle of up to five PT visits for a single one-time copay that can be renewed for another bundle of five PT visits – for its employer-based plan members with back pain. METHODS: A cohort of GHP members who were preauthorized for the PT bundle were compared against a contemporaneous cohort of GHP members who were preauthorized for PT under the standard per-visit copay arrangement between January 2013 and October 2014. RESULTS: Among the PT bundle cohort, the PT visit rate during the first 9 months since the PT preauthorization date had dramatically increased and then gradually decreased in subsequent months. The PT bundle was also associated with 29%–35% short-term reductions in emergency department visits and with 12%–20% reductions in primary care visits after 6 months. No significant impact on hospitalization or cost was observed. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the PT bundle appears to have led to a change in the treatment pattern of back pain that is more consistent with the recommended guidelines to use more conservative management such as PT as the first-line treatment for back pain. Dove Medical Press 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5459966/ /pubmed/28615965 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S135813 Text en © 2017 Maeng et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Maeng, Daniel D
Graboski, Anthony
Allison, Peiling L
Fisher, Dorothy Y
Bulger, John B
Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost
title Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost
title_full Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost
title_fullStr Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost
title_short Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost
title_sort impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5459966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28615965
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S135813
work_keys_str_mv AT maengdanield impactofavaluebasedinsurancedesignforphysicaltherapytotreatbackpainoncareutilizationandcost
AT graboskianthony impactofavaluebasedinsurancedesignforphysicaltherapytotreatbackpainoncareutilizationandcost
AT allisonpeilingl impactofavaluebasedinsurancedesignforphysicaltherapytotreatbackpainoncareutilizationandcost
AT fisherdorothyy impactofavaluebasedinsurancedesignforphysicaltherapytotreatbackpainoncareutilizationandcost
AT bulgerjohnb impactofavaluebasedinsurancedesignforphysicaltherapytotreatbackpainoncareutilizationandcost