Cargando…

Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently garnered attention as a putative depression treatment. However, the cognitive mechanisms by which it exerts an antidepressant effect are unclear: tDCS may directly alter ‘hot’ emotional processing biases, or alleviate depression through cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nord, Camilla L., Forster, Sophie, Halahakoon, D. Chamith, Penton-Voak, Ian S., Munafò, Marcus R., Roiser, Jonathan P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28158703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx007
_version_ 1783242085901533184
author Nord, Camilla L.
Forster, Sophie
Halahakoon, D. Chamith
Penton-Voak, Ian S.
Munafò, Marcus R.
Roiser, Jonathan P.
author_facet Nord, Camilla L.
Forster, Sophie
Halahakoon, D. Chamith
Penton-Voak, Ian S.
Munafò, Marcus R.
Roiser, Jonathan P.
author_sort Nord, Camilla L.
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently garnered attention as a putative depression treatment. However, the cognitive mechanisms by which it exerts an antidepressant effect are unclear: tDCS may directly alter ‘hot’ emotional processing biases, or alleviate depression through changes in ‘cold’ (non-emotional) cognitive function. Here, 75 healthy participants performed a facial emotion identification task during 20 minutes of anodal or sham tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in a double-blind, within-subject crossover design. A subset of 31 participants additionally completed a task measuring attentional distraction during stimulation. Compared to sham stimulation, anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC resulted in an increase in response latency across all emotional conditions. Bayesian analysis showed definitively that tDCS exerted no emotion-dependent effect on behaviour. Thus, we demonstrate that anodal tDCS produces a general, rather than an emotion-specific, effect. We also report a preliminary finding in the subset of participants who completed the distractibility task: increased distractibility during active stimulation correlated significantly with the degree to which tDCS slowed emotion identification. Our results provide insight into the possible mechanisms by which DLPFC tDCS may treat symptoms of depression, suggesting that it may not alter emotional biases, but instead may affect ‘cold’ cognitive processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5460043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54600432017-06-09 Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification Nord, Camilla L. Forster, Sophie Halahakoon, D. Chamith Penton-Voak, Ian S. Munafò, Marcus R. Roiser, Jonathan P. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently garnered attention as a putative depression treatment. However, the cognitive mechanisms by which it exerts an antidepressant effect are unclear: tDCS may directly alter ‘hot’ emotional processing biases, or alleviate depression through changes in ‘cold’ (non-emotional) cognitive function. Here, 75 healthy participants performed a facial emotion identification task during 20 minutes of anodal or sham tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in a double-blind, within-subject crossover design. A subset of 31 participants additionally completed a task measuring attentional distraction during stimulation. Compared to sham stimulation, anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC resulted in an increase in response latency across all emotional conditions. Bayesian analysis showed definitively that tDCS exerted no emotion-dependent effect on behaviour. Thus, we demonstrate that anodal tDCS produces a general, rather than an emotion-specific, effect. We also report a preliminary finding in the subset of participants who completed the distractibility task: increased distractibility during active stimulation correlated significantly with the degree to which tDCS slowed emotion identification. Our results provide insight into the possible mechanisms by which DLPFC tDCS may treat symptoms of depression, suggesting that it may not alter emotional biases, but instead may affect ‘cold’ cognitive processes. Oxford University Press 2017-05 2017-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5460043/ /pubmed/28158703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx007 Text en © The Author(s) (2017). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nord, Camilla L.
Forster, Sophie
Halahakoon, D. Chamith
Penton-Voak, Ian S.
Munafò, Marcus R.
Roiser, Jonathan P.
Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification
title Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification
title_full Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification
title_fullStr Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification
title_full_unstemmed Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification
title_short Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification
title_sort prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28158703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx007
work_keys_str_mv AT nordcamillal prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification
AT forstersophie prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification
AT halahakoondchamith prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification
AT pentonvoakians prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification
AT munafomarcusr prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification
AT roiserjonathanp prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification