Cargando…
Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently garnered attention as a putative depression treatment. However, the cognitive mechanisms by which it exerts an antidepressant effect are unclear: tDCS may directly alter ‘hot’ emotional processing biases, or alleviate depression through cha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28158703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx007 |
_version_ | 1783242085901533184 |
---|---|
author | Nord, Camilla L. Forster, Sophie Halahakoon, D. Chamith Penton-Voak, Ian S. Munafò, Marcus R. Roiser, Jonathan P. |
author_facet | Nord, Camilla L. Forster, Sophie Halahakoon, D. Chamith Penton-Voak, Ian S. Munafò, Marcus R. Roiser, Jonathan P. |
author_sort | Nord, Camilla L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently garnered attention as a putative depression treatment. However, the cognitive mechanisms by which it exerts an antidepressant effect are unclear: tDCS may directly alter ‘hot’ emotional processing biases, or alleviate depression through changes in ‘cold’ (non-emotional) cognitive function. Here, 75 healthy participants performed a facial emotion identification task during 20 minutes of anodal or sham tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in a double-blind, within-subject crossover design. A subset of 31 participants additionally completed a task measuring attentional distraction during stimulation. Compared to sham stimulation, anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC resulted in an increase in response latency across all emotional conditions. Bayesian analysis showed definitively that tDCS exerted no emotion-dependent effect on behaviour. Thus, we demonstrate that anodal tDCS produces a general, rather than an emotion-specific, effect. We also report a preliminary finding in the subset of participants who completed the distractibility task: increased distractibility during active stimulation correlated significantly with the degree to which tDCS slowed emotion identification. Our results provide insight into the possible mechanisms by which DLPFC tDCS may treat symptoms of depression, suggesting that it may not alter emotional biases, but instead may affect ‘cold’ cognitive processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5460043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54600432017-06-09 Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification Nord, Camilla L. Forster, Sophie Halahakoon, D. Chamith Penton-Voak, Ian S. Munafò, Marcus R. Roiser, Jonathan P. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently garnered attention as a putative depression treatment. However, the cognitive mechanisms by which it exerts an antidepressant effect are unclear: tDCS may directly alter ‘hot’ emotional processing biases, or alleviate depression through changes in ‘cold’ (non-emotional) cognitive function. Here, 75 healthy participants performed a facial emotion identification task during 20 minutes of anodal or sham tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in a double-blind, within-subject crossover design. A subset of 31 participants additionally completed a task measuring attentional distraction during stimulation. Compared to sham stimulation, anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC resulted in an increase in response latency across all emotional conditions. Bayesian analysis showed definitively that tDCS exerted no emotion-dependent effect on behaviour. Thus, we demonstrate that anodal tDCS produces a general, rather than an emotion-specific, effect. We also report a preliminary finding in the subset of participants who completed the distractibility task: increased distractibility during active stimulation correlated significantly with the degree to which tDCS slowed emotion identification. Our results provide insight into the possible mechanisms by which DLPFC tDCS may treat symptoms of depression, suggesting that it may not alter emotional biases, but instead may affect ‘cold’ cognitive processes. Oxford University Press 2017-05 2017-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5460043/ /pubmed/28158703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx007 Text en © The Author(s) (2017). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Nord, Camilla L. Forster, Sophie Halahakoon, D. Chamith Penton-Voak, Ian S. Munafò, Marcus R. Roiser, Jonathan P. Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification |
title | Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification |
title_full | Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification |
title_fullStr | Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification |
title_full_unstemmed | Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification |
title_short | Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification |
title_sort | prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28158703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nordcamillal prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification AT forstersophie prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification AT halahakoondchamith prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification AT pentonvoakians prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification AT munafomarcusr prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification AT roiserjonathanp prefrontalcortexstimulationdoesnotaffectemotionalbiasbutmayslowemotionidentification |