Cargando…

A Comparative Study of (68)Gallium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymph Node Staging in High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: An Initial Experience

Lymph node staging plays an important role in planning initial management in nonmetastatic prostate cancer. This article compares the role of (68)Gallium ((68)Ga)-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Manoj, Choudhury, Partha S., Hazarika, Dibyamohan, Rawal, Sudhir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670175
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.207272
_version_ 1783242141447749632
author Gupta, Manoj
Choudhury, Partha S.
Hazarika, Dibyamohan
Rawal, Sudhir
author_facet Gupta, Manoj
Choudhury, Partha S.
Hazarika, Dibyamohan
Rawal, Sudhir
author_sort Gupta, Manoj
collection PubMed
description Lymph node staging plays an important role in planning initial management in nonmetastatic prostate cancer. This article compares the role of (68)Gallium ((68)Ga)-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is considered the standard staging modality. Out of 39 high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT for staging (December 2014–December 2015), 12 patients underwent radical prostatectomy along with ePLND and were included in the analysis. Findings of the PSMA PET and MRI were compared with final histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value (PPV), negative predicative value (NPV), and accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and MRI were calculated for numbers of patients and pelvic lymph node metastasis. Chi-square test, McNemar's test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were also done. (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and MRI sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for number of patients detection were 100%, 80%, 87.5%, 100%, 91.67%, and 57.14%, 80%, 80%, 57.4%, 66.67%, respectively. For detection of metastatic lymph node, it was 66.67%, 98.61%, 85.71%, 95.95%, 95.06% and 25.93%, 98.61%, 70%, 91.42%, 90.53%, respectively. Difference of lymph nodal detectability was statistically significant on Chi-square test. On McNemar's test, P value was statistically insignificant for number of patient detection (P = 0.250) but statistically significant for lymph nodal detection (P = 0.001) for (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT. In ROC analysis, area under the curve was also significantly high for lymph node detectability by (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT. Our initial experience shows that (68)GaPSMA PET-CT is a very promising tracer for N staging in the initial workup of prostate cancer. It has the potential to impact patient's initial management and can up- and down-stage effectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5460300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54603002017-07-01 A Comparative Study of (68)Gallium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymph Node Staging in High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: An Initial Experience Gupta, Manoj Choudhury, Partha S. Hazarika, Dibyamohan Rawal, Sudhir World J Nucl Med Original Article Lymph node staging plays an important role in planning initial management in nonmetastatic prostate cancer. This article compares the role of (68)Gallium ((68)Ga)-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is considered the standard staging modality. Out of 39 high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT for staging (December 2014–December 2015), 12 patients underwent radical prostatectomy along with ePLND and were included in the analysis. Findings of the PSMA PET and MRI were compared with final histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value (PPV), negative predicative value (NPV), and accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and MRI were calculated for numbers of patients and pelvic lymph node metastasis. Chi-square test, McNemar's test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were also done. (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT and MRI sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for number of patients detection were 100%, 80%, 87.5%, 100%, 91.67%, and 57.14%, 80%, 80%, 57.4%, 66.67%, respectively. For detection of metastatic lymph node, it was 66.67%, 98.61%, 85.71%, 95.95%, 95.06% and 25.93%, 98.61%, 70%, 91.42%, 90.53%, respectively. Difference of lymph nodal detectability was statistically significant on Chi-square test. On McNemar's test, P value was statistically insignificant for number of patient detection (P = 0.250) but statistically significant for lymph nodal detection (P = 0.001) for (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT. In ROC analysis, area under the curve was also significantly high for lymph node detectability by (68)Ga-PSMA PET-CT. Our initial experience shows that (68)GaPSMA PET-CT is a very promising tracer for N staging in the initial workup of prostate cancer. It has the potential to impact patient's initial management and can up- and down-stage effectively. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5460300/ /pubmed/28670175 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.207272 Text en Copyright: © 2017 World Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Manoj
Choudhury, Partha S.
Hazarika, Dibyamohan
Rawal, Sudhir
A Comparative Study of (68)Gallium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymph Node Staging in High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: An Initial Experience
title A Comparative Study of (68)Gallium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymph Node Staging in High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: An Initial Experience
title_full A Comparative Study of (68)Gallium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymph Node Staging in High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: An Initial Experience
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of (68)Gallium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymph Node Staging in High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: An Initial Experience
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of (68)Gallium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymph Node Staging in High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: An Initial Experience
title_short A Comparative Study of (68)Gallium-Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymph Node Staging in High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: An Initial Experience
title_sort comparative study of (68)gallium-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for lymph node staging in high risk prostate cancer patients: an initial experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670175
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.207272
work_keys_str_mv AT guptamanoj acomparativestudyof68galliumprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforlymphnodestaginginhighriskprostatecancerpatientsaninitialexperience
AT choudhuryparthas acomparativestudyof68galliumprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforlymphnodestaginginhighriskprostatecancerpatientsaninitialexperience
AT hazarikadibyamohan acomparativestudyof68galliumprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforlymphnodestaginginhighriskprostatecancerpatientsaninitialexperience
AT rawalsudhir acomparativestudyof68galliumprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforlymphnodestaginginhighriskprostatecancerpatientsaninitialexperience
AT guptamanoj comparativestudyof68galliumprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforlymphnodestaginginhighriskprostatecancerpatientsaninitialexperience
AT choudhuryparthas comparativestudyof68galliumprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforlymphnodestaginginhighriskprostatecancerpatientsaninitialexperience
AT hazarikadibyamohan comparativestudyof68galliumprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforlymphnodestaginginhighriskprostatecancerpatientsaninitialexperience
AT rawalsudhir comparativestudyof68galliumprostatespecificmembraneantigenpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingforlymphnodestaginginhighriskprostatecancerpatientsaninitialexperience