Cargando…
Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals
BACKGROUND: This paper joins the debate over changes in the role of health professionals when applying advance directives to manage the decision-making process at the end of life care. Issues in relation to advance directives occur in clinical units in Lithuania; however, it remains one of the few c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28583175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0197-6 |
_version_ | 1783242146061484032 |
---|---|
author | Peicius, Eimantas Blazeviciene, Aurelija Kaminskas, Raimondas |
author_facet | Peicius, Eimantas Blazeviciene, Aurelija Kaminskas, Raimondas |
author_sort | Peicius, Eimantas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This paper joins the debate over changes in the role of health professionals when applying advance directives to manage the decision-making process at the end of life care. Issues in relation to advance directives occur in clinical units in Lithuania; however, it remains one of the few countries in the European Union (EU) where the discussion on advance directives is not included in the health-care policy-making agenda. To encourage the discussion of advance directives, a study was designed to examine health professionals’ understanding and preferences related to advance directives. In addition, the study sought to explore the views of health care professionals of the application of Advance Directives (AD) in clinical practice in Lithuania. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by interviewing 478 health professionals based at major health care centers in Kaunas district, Lithuania. The design of the study included the use of a questionnaire developed for this study and validated by a pilot study. The collected data were analyzed using standard descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: The analysis of knowledge about AD revealed some statistically significant differences when comparing the respondents’ profession and gender. The analysis also indicated key emerging themes among respondents including tranquility of mind, the longest possible life expectancy and freedom of choice. Further, the study findings revealed that more than half of the study participants preferred to express their will while alive by using advance directives. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings revealed a low level of knowledge on advance directives among health professionals. Most health professionals agreed that AD’s improved end-of-life decision making while the majority of physicians appreciated AD as the best tool for sharing responsibilities in clinical practice in Lithuania. More physicians than nurses preferred the presence of advance directives to support their decision making in end-of-life situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5460321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54603212017-06-07 Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals Peicius, Eimantas Blazeviciene, Aurelija Kaminskas, Raimondas BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: This paper joins the debate over changes in the role of health professionals when applying advance directives to manage the decision-making process at the end of life care. Issues in relation to advance directives occur in clinical units in Lithuania; however, it remains one of the few countries in the European Union (EU) where the discussion on advance directives is not included in the health-care policy-making agenda. To encourage the discussion of advance directives, a study was designed to examine health professionals’ understanding and preferences related to advance directives. In addition, the study sought to explore the views of health care professionals of the application of Advance Directives (AD) in clinical practice in Lithuania. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by interviewing 478 health professionals based at major health care centers in Kaunas district, Lithuania. The design of the study included the use of a questionnaire developed for this study and validated by a pilot study. The collected data were analyzed using standard descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: The analysis of knowledge about AD revealed some statistically significant differences when comparing the respondents’ profession and gender. The analysis also indicated key emerging themes among respondents including tranquility of mind, the longest possible life expectancy and freedom of choice. Further, the study findings revealed that more than half of the study participants preferred to express their will while alive by using advance directives. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings revealed a low level of knowledge on advance directives among health professionals. Most health professionals agreed that AD’s improved end-of-life decision making while the majority of physicians appreciated AD as the best tool for sharing responsibilities in clinical practice in Lithuania. More physicians than nurses preferred the presence of advance directives to support their decision making in end-of-life situations. BioMed Central 2017-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5460321/ /pubmed/28583175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0197-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peicius, Eimantas Blazeviciene, Aurelija Kaminskas, Raimondas Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals |
title | Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals |
title_full | Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals |
title_fullStr | Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals |
title_short | Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals |
title_sort | are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28583175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0197-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peiciuseimantas areadvancedirectiveshelpfulforgoodendoflifedecisionmakingacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthprofessionals AT blazevicieneaurelija areadvancedirectiveshelpfulforgoodendoflifedecisionmakingacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthprofessionals AT kaminskasraimondas areadvancedirectiveshelpfulforgoodendoflifedecisionmakingacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthprofessionals |