Cargando…
Effects of unilateral real-time biofeedback on propulsive forces during gait
BACKGROUND: In individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis, reduced push-off force generation in the paretic leg negatively impacts walking function. Gait training interventions that increase paretic push-off can improve walking function in individuals with neurologic impairment. During normal locomoti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28583196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0252-z |
_version_ | 1783242154223599616 |
---|---|
author | Schenck, Christopher Kesar, Trisha M. |
author_facet | Schenck, Christopher Kesar, Trisha M. |
author_sort | Schenck, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis, reduced push-off force generation in the paretic leg negatively impacts walking function. Gait training interventions that increase paretic push-off can improve walking function in individuals with neurologic impairment. During normal locomotion, push-off forces are modulated with variations in gait speed and slope. However, it is unknown whether able-bodied individuals can selectively modulate push-off forces from one leg in response to biofeedback. Here, in a group of young, neurologically-unimpaired individuals, we determined the effects of a real-time visual and auditory biofeedback gait training paradigm aimed at unilaterally increasing anteriorly-directed ground reaction force (AGRF) in the targeted leg. METHODS: Ground reaction force data during were collected from 7 able-bodied individuals as they walked at a self-selected pace on a dual-belt treadmill instrumented with force platforms. During 11-min of gait training, study participants were provided real-time AGRF biofeedback encouraging a 20–30% increase in peak AGRF generated by their right (targeted) leg compared to their baseline (pre-training) AGRF. AGRF data were collected before, during, and after the biofeedback training period, as well as during two retention tests performed without biofeedback and after standing breaks. RESULTS: Compared to AGRFs generated during the pre-training gait trials, participants demonstrated a significantly greater AGRF in the targeted leg during and immediately after training, indicating that biofeedback training was successful at inducing increased AGRF production in the targeted leg. Additionally, participants continued to demonstrate greater AGRF production in the targeted leg after two standing breaks, showing short-term recall of the gait pattern learned during the biofeedback training. No significant effects of training were observed on the AGRF in the non-targeted limb, showing the specificity of the effects of biofeedback toward the targeted limb. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the short-term effects of using unilateral AGRF biofeedback to target propulsion in a specific leg, which may have utility as a training tool for individuals with gait deficits such as post-stroke hemiparesis. Future studies are needed to investigate the effects of real-time AGRF biofeedback as a gait training tool in neurologically-impaired individuals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-017-0252-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5460355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54603552017-06-07 Effects of unilateral real-time biofeedback on propulsive forces during gait Schenck, Christopher Kesar, Trisha M. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: In individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis, reduced push-off force generation in the paretic leg negatively impacts walking function. Gait training interventions that increase paretic push-off can improve walking function in individuals with neurologic impairment. During normal locomotion, push-off forces are modulated with variations in gait speed and slope. However, it is unknown whether able-bodied individuals can selectively modulate push-off forces from one leg in response to biofeedback. Here, in a group of young, neurologically-unimpaired individuals, we determined the effects of a real-time visual and auditory biofeedback gait training paradigm aimed at unilaterally increasing anteriorly-directed ground reaction force (AGRF) in the targeted leg. METHODS: Ground reaction force data during were collected from 7 able-bodied individuals as they walked at a self-selected pace on a dual-belt treadmill instrumented with force platforms. During 11-min of gait training, study participants were provided real-time AGRF biofeedback encouraging a 20–30% increase in peak AGRF generated by their right (targeted) leg compared to their baseline (pre-training) AGRF. AGRF data were collected before, during, and after the biofeedback training period, as well as during two retention tests performed without biofeedback and after standing breaks. RESULTS: Compared to AGRFs generated during the pre-training gait trials, participants demonstrated a significantly greater AGRF in the targeted leg during and immediately after training, indicating that biofeedback training was successful at inducing increased AGRF production in the targeted leg. Additionally, participants continued to demonstrate greater AGRF production in the targeted leg after two standing breaks, showing short-term recall of the gait pattern learned during the biofeedback training. No significant effects of training were observed on the AGRF in the non-targeted limb, showing the specificity of the effects of biofeedback toward the targeted limb. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the short-term effects of using unilateral AGRF biofeedback to target propulsion in a specific leg, which may have utility as a training tool for individuals with gait deficits such as post-stroke hemiparesis. Future studies are needed to investigate the effects of real-time AGRF biofeedback as a gait training tool in neurologically-impaired individuals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-017-0252-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5460355/ /pubmed/28583196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0252-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Schenck, Christopher Kesar, Trisha M. Effects of unilateral real-time biofeedback on propulsive forces during gait |
title | Effects of unilateral real-time biofeedback on propulsive forces during gait |
title_full | Effects of unilateral real-time biofeedback on propulsive forces during gait |
title_fullStr | Effects of unilateral real-time biofeedback on propulsive forces during gait |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of unilateral real-time biofeedback on propulsive forces during gait |
title_short | Effects of unilateral real-time biofeedback on propulsive forces during gait |
title_sort | effects of unilateral real-time biofeedback on propulsive forces during gait |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28583196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0252-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schenckchristopher effectsofunilateralrealtimebiofeedbackonpropulsiveforcesduringgait AT kesartrisham effectsofunilateralrealtimebiofeedbackonpropulsiveforcesduringgait |