Cargando…
Prevalence and distribution of Gardnerella vaginalis subgroups in women with and without bacterial vaginosis
BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the leading causes of vaginal complaints among women of childbearing age. The role of Gardnerella vaginalis remains controversial due to its presence in healthy and BV-type vaginal microflora. The phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of G. vaginalis s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28583109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2501-y |
_version_ | 1783242169628229632 |
---|---|
author | Janulaitiene, Migle Paliulyte, Virginija Grinceviciene, Svitrigaile Zakareviciene, Jolita Vladisauskiene, Alma Marcinkute, Agne Pleckaityte, Milda |
author_facet | Janulaitiene, Migle Paliulyte, Virginija Grinceviciene, Svitrigaile Zakareviciene, Jolita Vladisauskiene, Alma Marcinkute, Agne Pleckaityte, Milda |
author_sort | Janulaitiene, Migle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the leading causes of vaginal complaints among women of childbearing age. The role of Gardnerella vaginalis remains controversial due to its presence in healthy and BV-type vaginal microflora. The phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of G. vaginalis suggested the existence of strain variants linked with different health conditions. We sought to analyze prevalence and distribution of G. vaginalis subgroups (clades) in BV-positive (n = 29), partial BV (n = 27), and BV-negative (n = 53) vaginal samples from Lithuanian women. METHODS: Vaginal samples were characterized by Amsel criteria and the Nugent method. Bacterial signatures characteristic of BV and concomitant infections were identified by culture and PCR. Using singleplex PCR assays, G. vaginalis subgroups were identified in 109 noncultured vaginal specimens by targeting clade-specific genes. Isolated G. vaginalis clinical strains were subtyped and the presence of the sialidase coding gene was detected by PCR. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism statistical software. RESULTS: G. vaginalis was found in 87% of women without BV. Clade 4 was most frequently detected (79.4%), followed by clade 1 (63.7%), clade 2 (42.2%), and clade 3 (15.7%). Multi-clade G. vaginalis communities showed a positive association with Nugent score (NS) ≥ 4 (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.48–8.91; p = 0.005). Clade 1 and clade 2 were statistically significantly more common in samples with NS 7–10 (OR 4.69; 95% CI 1.38–15.88; p = 0.01 and OR 6.26; 95% CI 2.20–17.81; p ≤ 0.001, respectively). Clade 3 and clade 4 showed no association with high NS (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.26–3.04; p = 1.00 and OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.39–4.41; p = 0.767, respectively). The gene coding for sialidase was detected in all isolates of clade 1 and clade 2, but not in clade 4 isolates. CONCLUSIONS: We showed an association between the microbial state of vaginal microflora and specific subgroups of G. vaginalis, the distribution of which may determine the clinical manifestation of BV. The frequent detection of clade 4 in the BV-negative samples might be due its lack of the gene coding for sialidase. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-017-2501-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5460423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54604232017-06-07 Prevalence and distribution of Gardnerella vaginalis subgroups in women with and without bacterial vaginosis Janulaitiene, Migle Paliulyte, Virginija Grinceviciene, Svitrigaile Zakareviciene, Jolita Vladisauskiene, Alma Marcinkute, Agne Pleckaityte, Milda BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the leading causes of vaginal complaints among women of childbearing age. The role of Gardnerella vaginalis remains controversial due to its presence in healthy and BV-type vaginal microflora. The phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of G. vaginalis suggested the existence of strain variants linked with different health conditions. We sought to analyze prevalence and distribution of G. vaginalis subgroups (clades) in BV-positive (n = 29), partial BV (n = 27), and BV-negative (n = 53) vaginal samples from Lithuanian women. METHODS: Vaginal samples were characterized by Amsel criteria and the Nugent method. Bacterial signatures characteristic of BV and concomitant infections were identified by culture and PCR. Using singleplex PCR assays, G. vaginalis subgroups were identified in 109 noncultured vaginal specimens by targeting clade-specific genes. Isolated G. vaginalis clinical strains were subtyped and the presence of the sialidase coding gene was detected by PCR. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism statistical software. RESULTS: G. vaginalis was found in 87% of women without BV. Clade 4 was most frequently detected (79.4%), followed by clade 1 (63.7%), clade 2 (42.2%), and clade 3 (15.7%). Multi-clade G. vaginalis communities showed a positive association with Nugent score (NS) ≥ 4 (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.48–8.91; p = 0.005). Clade 1 and clade 2 were statistically significantly more common in samples with NS 7–10 (OR 4.69; 95% CI 1.38–15.88; p = 0.01 and OR 6.26; 95% CI 2.20–17.81; p ≤ 0.001, respectively). Clade 3 and clade 4 showed no association with high NS (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.26–3.04; p = 1.00 and OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.39–4.41; p = 0.767, respectively). The gene coding for sialidase was detected in all isolates of clade 1 and clade 2, but not in clade 4 isolates. CONCLUSIONS: We showed an association between the microbial state of vaginal microflora and specific subgroups of G. vaginalis, the distribution of which may determine the clinical manifestation of BV. The frequent detection of clade 4 in the BV-negative samples might be due its lack of the gene coding for sialidase. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-017-2501-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5460423/ /pubmed/28583109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2501-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Janulaitiene, Migle Paliulyte, Virginija Grinceviciene, Svitrigaile Zakareviciene, Jolita Vladisauskiene, Alma Marcinkute, Agne Pleckaityte, Milda Prevalence and distribution of Gardnerella vaginalis subgroups in women with and without bacterial vaginosis |
title | Prevalence and distribution of Gardnerella vaginalis subgroups in women with and without bacterial vaginosis |
title_full | Prevalence and distribution of Gardnerella vaginalis subgroups in women with and without bacterial vaginosis |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and distribution of Gardnerella vaginalis subgroups in women with and without bacterial vaginosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and distribution of Gardnerella vaginalis subgroups in women with and without bacterial vaginosis |
title_short | Prevalence and distribution of Gardnerella vaginalis subgroups in women with and without bacterial vaginosis |
title_sort | prevalence and distribution of gardnerella vaginalis subgroups in women with and without bacterial vaginosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28583109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2501-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janulaitienemigle prevalenceanddistributionofgardnerellavaginalissubgroupsinwomenwithandwithoutbacterialvaginosis AT paliulytevirginija prevalenceanddistributionofgardnerellavaginalissubgroupsinwomenwithandwithoutbacterialvaginosis AT grincevicienesvitrigaile prevalenceanddistributionofgardnerellavaginalissubgroupsinwomenwithandwithoutbacterialvaginosis AT zakarevicienejolita prevalenceanddistributionofgardnerellavaginalissubgroupsinwomenwithandwithoutbacterialvaginosis AT vladisauskienealma prevalenceanddistributionofgardnerellavaginalissubgroupsinwomenwithandwithoutbacterialvaginosis AT marcinkuteagne prevalenceanddistributionofgardnerellavaginalissubgroupsinwomenwithandwithoutbacterialvaginosis AT pleckaitytemilda prevalenceanddistributionofgardnerellavaginalissubgroupsinwomenwithandwithoutbacterialvaginosis |