Cargando…

Analysis of instrumentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine

BACKGROUND: Correction of fixed spinal imbalance in a sagittal and/or coronal plane frequently needs a tricolumnar wedge resection when the deformity is rigid. Complications associated with deformity correction surgery are pseudoarthrosis and implant failure located along the construct. The purposes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kavadi, Niranjan, Tallarico, Richard A., Lavelle, William F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0127-x
_version_ 1783242187724554240
author Kavadi, Niranjan
Tallarico, Richard A.
Lavelle, William F.
author_facet Kavadi, Niranjan
Tallarico, Richard A.
Lavelle, William F.
author_sort Kavadi, Niranjan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Correction of fixed spinal imbalance in a sagittal and/or coronal plane frequently needs a tricolumnar wedge resection when the deformity is rigid. Complications associated with deformity correction surgery are pseudoarthrosis and implant failure located along the construct. The purposes of this study were to assess comparative rates of pseudoarthrosis (implant failure) at weaker points along lumbosacral junction and level of osteotomy, estimate overall incidence of implant failure, and comparatively analyze failures at different points along the construct. METHODS: This was an IRB approved, single center study retrospective analysis. Twenty-six patients who underwent three column osteotomies were grouped according to procedure: pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO, (n = 18)); vertebral column resection (VCR, (n = 4)); hemivertebra excision (HE, (n = 2)); and extracavitary corpectomy (EC, (n = 2)). Follow-up data is presented on all of the study patients. Number of levels of fusion, anchors, percent saturation of fixation levels, type of bone graft and graft substitutes, and rod material and diameter were recorded. Radiographical data was reviewed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months and annually to determine sagittal and coronal balance, lumbopelvic parameters, presence or absence of interbody structural support, laterality or rod failure, and time to implant failure. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent (7/26) patients demonstrated rod breakage either unilaterally (N = 2) or bilaterally (N = 5) during follow-up. Seventy-one percent had increasing back pain or worsening sagittal balance, while remaining failures found incidentally. No failures in children were seen. CONCLUSION: Tricolumnar osteotomy by posterior approach is a valuable tool. Rod failures found approximately 1 year from surgery, with 86% located at level of osteotomy and 14% at lumbosacral junction. Possible reasons are increased stress in the rod at this point and relatively deficient bone stock secondary to wide laminectomy. The low rate of rod breakage at lumbosacral junction may be related to adoption of structural interbody graft and stronger iliac screws. Additional biomechanical studies needed to assess the importance of these factors. This was a level IV study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5460493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54604932017-06-07 Analysis of instrumentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine Kavadi, Niranjan Tallarico, Richard A. Lavelle, William F. Scoliosis Spinal Disord Research BACKGROUND: Correction of fixed spinal imbalance in a sagittal and/or coronal plane frequently needs a tricolumnar wedge resection when the deformity is rigid. Complications associated with deformity correction surgery are pseudoarthrosis and implant failure located along the construct. The purposes of this study were to assess comparative rates of pseudoarthrosis (implant failure) at weaker points along lumbosacral junction and level of osteotomy, estimate overall incidence of implant failure, and comparatively analyze failures at different points along the construct. METHODS: This was an IRB approved, single center study retrospective analysis. Twenty-six patients who underwent three column osteotomies were grouped according to procedure: pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO, (n = 18)); vertebral column resection (VCR, (n = 4)); hemivertebra excision (HE, (n = 2)); and extracavitary corpectomy (EC, (n = 2)). Follow-up data is presented on all of the study patients. Number of levels of fusion, anchors, percent saturation of fixation levels, type of bone graft and graft substitutes, and rod material and diameter were recorded. Radiographical data was reviewed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months and annually to determine sagittal and coronal balance, lumbopelvic parameters, presence or absence of interbody structural support, laterality or rod failure, and time to implant failure. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent (7/26) patients demonstrated rod breakage either unilaterally (N = 2) or bilaterally (N = 5) during follow-up. Seventy-one percent had increasing back pain or worsening sagittal balance, while remaining failures found incidentally. No failures in children were seen. CONCLUSION: Tricolumnar osteotomy by posterior approach is a valuable tool. Rod failures found approximately 1 year from surgery, with 86% located at level of osteotomy and 14% at lumbosacral junction. Possible reasons are increased stress in the rod at this point and relatively deficient bone stock secondary to wide laminectomy. The low rate of rod breakage at lumbosacral junction may be related to adoption of structural interbody graft and stronger iliac screws. Additional biomechanical studies needed to assess the importance of these factors. This was a level IV study. BioMed Central 2017-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5460493/ /pubmed/28593199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0127-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kavadi, Niranjan
Tallarico, Richard A.
Lavelle, William F.
Analysis of instrumentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine
title Analysis of instrumentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine
title_full Analysis of instrumentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine
title_fullStr Analysis of instrumentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of instrumentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine
title_short Analysis of instrumentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine
title_sort analysis of instrumentation failures after three column osteotomies of the spine
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0127-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kavadiniranjan analysisofinstrumentationfailuresafterthreecolumnosteotomiesofthespine
AT tallaricoricharda analysisofinstrumentationfailuresafterthreecolumnosteotomiesofthespine
AT lavellewilliamf analysisofinstrumentationfailuresafterthreecolumnosteotomiesofthespine