Cargando…

A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples

BACKGROUND: RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as one of the most sensitive tool for gene expression analysis. Among the library preparation methods available, the standard poly(A) + enrichment provides a comprehensive, detailed, and accurate view of polyadenylated RNAs. However, on samples of sub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuierer, Sven, Carbone, Walter, Knehr, Judith, Petitjean, Virginie, Fernandez, Anita, Sultan, Marc, Roma, Guglielmo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28583074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3827-y
_version_ 1783242198541664256
author Schuierer, Sven
Carbone, Walter
Knehr, Judith
Petitjean, Virginie
Fernandez, Anita
Sultan, Marc
Roma, Guglielmo
author_facet Schuierer, Sven
Carbone, Walter
Knehr, Judith
Petitjean, Virginie
Fernandez, Anita
Sultan, Marc
Roma, Guglielmo
author_sort Schuierer, Sven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as one of the most sensitive tool for gene expression analysis. Among the library preparation methods available, the standard poly(A) + enrichment provides a comprehensive, detailed, and accurate view of polyadenylated RNAs. However, on samples of suboptimal quality ribosomal RNA depletion and exon capture methods have recently been reported as better alternatives. METHODS: We compared for the first time three commercial Illumina library preparation kits (TruSeq Stranded mRNA, TruSeq Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal, and TruSeq RNA Access) as representatives of these three different approaches using well-established human reference RNA samples from the MAQC/SEQC consortium on a wide range of input amounts (from 100 ng down to 1 ng) and degradation levels (intact, degraded, and highly degraded). RESULTS: We assessed the accuracy of the generated expression values by comparison to gold standard TaqMan qPCR measurements and gained unprecedented insight into the limits of applicability in terms of input quantity and sample quality of each protocol. We found that each protocol generates highly reproducible results (R (2) > 0.92) on intact RNA samples down to input amounts of 10 ng. For degraded RNA samples, Ribo-Zero showed clear performance advantages over the other two protocols as it generated more accurate and better reproducible gene expression results even at very low input amounts such as 1 ng and 2 ng. For highly degraded RNA samples, RNA Access performed best generating reliable data down to 5 ng input. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the ribosomal RNA depletion protocol from Illumina works very well at amounts far below recommendation and over a good range of intact and degraded material. We also infer that the exome-capture protocol (RNA Access, Illumina) performs better than other methods on highly degraded and low amount samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3827-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5460543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54605432017-06-07 A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples Schuierer, Sven Carbone, Walter Knehr, Judith Petitjean, Virginie Fernandez, Anita Sultan, Marc Roma, Guglielmo BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as one of the most sensitive tool for gene expression analysis. Among the library preparation methods available, the standard poly(A) + enrichment provides a comprehensive, detailed, and accurate view of polyadenylated RNAs. However, on samples of suboptimal quality ribosomal RNA depletion and exon capture methods have recently been reported as better alternatives. METHODS: We compared for the first time three commercial Illumina library preparation kits (TruSeq Stranded mRNA, TruSeq Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal, and TruSeq RNA Access) as representatives of these three different approaches using well-established human reference RNA samples from the MAQC/SEQC consortium on a wide range of input amounts (from 100 ng down to 1 ng) and degradation levels (intact, degraded, and highly degraded). RESULTS: We assessed the accuracy of the generated expression values by comparison to gold standard TaqMan qPCR measurements and gained unprecedented insight into the limits of applicability in terms of input quantity and sample quality of each protocol. We found that each protocol generates highly reproducible results (R (2) > 0.92) on intact RNA samples down to input amounts of 10 ng. For degraded RNA samples, Ribo-Zero showed clear performance advantages over the other two protocols as it generated more accurate and better reproducible gene expression results even at very low input amounts such as 1 ng and 2 ng. For highly degraded RNA samples, RNA Access performed best generating reliable data down to 5 ng input. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the ribosomal RNA depletion protocol from Illumina works very well at amounts far below recommendation and over a good range of intact and degraded material. We also infer that the exome-capture protocol (RNA Access, Illumina) performs better than other methods on highly degraded and low amount samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3827-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5460543/ /pubmed/28583074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3827-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Schuierer, Sven
Carbone, Walter
Knehr, Judith
Petitjean, Virginie
Fernandez, Anita
Sultan, Marc
Roma, Guglielmo
A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples
title A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples
title_full A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples
title_fullStr A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples
title_short A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples
title_sort comprehensive assessment of rna-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28583074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3827-y
work_keys_str_mv AT schuierersven acomprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT carbonewalter acomprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT knehrjudith acomprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT petitjeanvirginie acomprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT fernandezanita acomprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT sultanmarc acomprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT romaguglielmo acomprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT schuierersven comprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT carbonewalter comprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT knehrjudith comprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT petitjeanvirginie comprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT fernandezanita comprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT sultanmarc comprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples
AT romaguglielmo comprehensiveassessmentofrnaseqprotocolsfordegradedandlowquantitysamples