Cargando…
Comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation
Stimulation of deeper brain structures by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plays a role in the study of reward and motivation mechanisms, which may be beneficial in the treatment of several neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, electric field distributions induced in the brain by d...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178422 |
_version_ | 1783242236136259584 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Mai Ueno, Shoogo |
author_facet | Lu, Mai Ueno, Shoogo |
author_sort | Lu, Mai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stimulation of deeper brain structures by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plays a role in the study of reward and motivation mechanisms, which may be beneficial in the treatment of several neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, electric field distributions induced in the brain by deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) are still unknown. In this paper, the double cone coil, H-coil and Halo-circular assembly (HCA) coil which have been proposed for dTMS have been numerically designed. The distributions of magnetic flux density, induced electric field in an anatomically based realistic head model by applying the dTMS coils were numerically calculated by the impedance method. Results were compared with that of standard figure-of-eight (Fo8) coil. Simulation results show that double cone, H- and HCA coils have significantly deep field penetration compared to the conventional Fo8 coil, at the expense of induced higher and wider spread electrical fields in superficial cortical regions. Double cone and HCA coils have better ability to stimulate deep brain subregions compared to that of the H-coil. In the mean time, both double cone and HCA coils increase risk for optical nerve excitation. Our results suggest although the dTMS coils offer new tool with potential for both research and clinical applications for psychiatric and neurological disorders associated with dysfunctions of deep brain regions, the selection of the most suitable coil settings for a specific clinical application should be based on a balanced evaluation between stimulation depth and focality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5460812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54608122017-06-15 Comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation Lu, Mai Ueno, Shoogo PLoS One Research Article Stimulation of deeper brain structures by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plays a role in the study of reward and motivation mechanisms, which may be beneficial in the treatment of several neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, electric field distributions induced in the brain by deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) are still unknown. In this paper, the double cone coil, H-coil and Halo-circular assembly (HCA) coil which have been proposed for dTMS have been numerically designed. The distributions of magnetic flux density, induced electric field in an anatomically based realistic head model by applying the dTMS coils were numerically calculated by the impedance method. Results were compared with that of standard figure-of-eight (Fo8) coil. Simulation results show that double cone, H- and HCA coils have significantly deep field penetration compared to the conventional Fo8 coil, at the expense of induced higher and wider spread electrical fields in superficial cortical regions. Double cone and HCA coils have better ability to stimulate deep brain subregions compared to that of the H-coil. In the mean time, both double cone and HCA coils increase risk for optical nerve excitation. Our results suggest although the dTMS coils offer new tool with potential for both research and clinical applications for psychiatric and neurological disorders associated with dysfunctions of deep brain regions, the selection of the most suitable coil settings for a specific clinical application should be based on a balanced evaluation between stimulation depth and focality. Public Library of Science 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5460812/ /pubmed/28586349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178422 Text en © 2017 Lu, Ueno http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lu, Mai Ueno, Shoogo Comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title | Comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_full | Comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_short | Comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation |
title_sort | comparison of the induced fields using different coil configurations during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5460812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lumai comparisonoftheinducedfieldsusingdifferentcoilconfigurationsduringdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulation AT uenoshoogo comparisonoftheinducedfieldsusingdifferentcoilconfigurationsduringdeeptranscranialmagneticstimulation |