Cargando…

Discharge or admit? Emergency department management of incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization and early anticoagulation therapy remain standard care for patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with pulmonary embolism (PE). For PEs discovered incidentally, however, optimal therapeutic strategies are less clear—and all the more so when the patient has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banala, Srinivas R., Yeung, Sai-Ching Jim, Rice, Terry W., Reyes-Gibby, Cielito C., Wu, Carol C., Todd, Knox H., Peacock, W. Frank, Alagappan, Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5461224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28589462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-017-0144-9
_version_ 1783242295107125248
author Banala, Srinivas R.
Yeung, Sai-Ching Jim
Rice, Terry W.
Reyes-Gibby, Cielito C.
Wu, Carol C.
Todd, Knox H.
Peacock, W. Frank
Alagappan, Kumar
author_facet Banala, Srinivas R.
Yeung, Sai-Ching Jim
Rice, Terry W.
Reyes-Gibby, Cielito C.
Wu, Carol C.
Todd, Knox H.
Peacock, W. Frank
Alagappan, Kumar
author_sort Banala, Srinivas R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospitalization and early anticoagulation therapy remain standard care for patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with pulmonary embolism (PE). For PEs discovered incidentally, however, optimal therapeutic strategies are less clear—and all the more so when the patient has cancer, which is associated with a hypercoagulable state that exacerbates the threat of PE. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a historical cohort of patients with cancer and incidental PE who were referred for assessment to the ED in an institution whose standard of care is outpatient treatment of selected patients and use of low-molecular-weight heparin for anticoagulation. Eligible patients had received a diagnosis of incidental PE upon routine contrast enhanced chest CT for cancer staging. Survival data was collected at 30 days and 90 days from the date of ED presentation and at the end of the study. RESULTS: We identified 193 patients, 135 (70%) of whom were discharged and 58 (30%) of whom were admitted to the hospital. The 30-day survival rate was 92% overall, 99% for the discharged patients and 76% for admitted patients. Almost all (189 patients, 98%) commenced anticoagulation therapy in the ED; 170 (90%) of these received low-molecular-weight heparin. Patients with saddle pulmonary artery incidental PEs were more likely to die within 30 days (43%) than were those with main or lobar (11%), segmental (6%), or subsegmental (5%) incidental PEs. In multivariate analysis, Charlson comorbidity index (age unadjusted), hypoxemia, and incidental PE location (P = 0.004, relative risk 33.5 (95% CI 3.1–357.4, comparing saddle versus subsegmental PE) were significantly associated with 30-day survival. Age, comorbidity, race, cancer stage, tachycardia, hypoxemia, and incidental PE location were significantly associated with hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: Selected cancer patients presenting to the ED with incidental PE can be treated with low-molecular-weight heparin anticoagulation and safely discharged. Avoidance of unnecessary hospitalization may decrease in-hospital infections and death, reduce healthcare costs, and improve patient quality of life. Because the natural history and optimal management of this condition is not well described, information supporting the creation of straightforward evidence-based practice guidelines for ED teams treating this specialized patient population is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5461224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54612242017-06-22 Discharge or admit? Emergency department management of incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a retrospective study Banala, Srinivas R. Yeung, Sai-Ching Jim Rice, Terry W. Reyes-Gibby, Cielito C. Wu, Carol C. Todd, Knox H. Peacock, W. Frank Alagappan, Kumar Int J Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Hospitalization and early anticoagulation therapy remain standard care for patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with pulmonary embolism (PE). For PEs discovered incidentally, however, optimal therapeutic strategies are less clear—and all the more so when the patient has cancer, which is associated with a hypercoagulable state that exacerbates the threat of PE. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a historical cohort of patients with cancer and incidental PE who were referred for assessment to the ED in an institution whose standard of care is outpatient treatment of selected patients and use of low-molecular-weight heparin for anticoagulation. Eligible patients had received a diagnosis of incidental PE upon routine contrast enhanced chest CT for cancer staging. Survival data was collected at 30 days and 90 days from the date of ED presentation and at the end of the study. RESULTS: We identified 193 patients, 135 (70%) of whom were discharged and 58 (30%) of whom were admitted to the hospital. The 30-day survival rate was 92% overall, 99% for the discharged patients and 76% for admitted patients. Almost all (189 patients, 98%) commenced anticoagulation therapy in the ED; 170 (90%) of these received low-molecular-weight heparin. Patients with saddle pulmonary artery incidental PEs were more likely to die within 30 days (43%) than were those with main or lobar (11%), segmental (6%), or subsegmental (5%) incidental PEs. In multivariate analysis, Charlson comorbidity index (age unadjusted), hypoxemia, and incidental PE location (P = 0.004, relative risk 33.5 (95% CI 3.1–357.4, comparing saddle versus subsegmental PE) were significantly associated with 30-day survival. Age, comorbidity, race, cancer stage, tachycardia, hypoxemia, and incidental PE location were significantly associated with hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: Selected cancer patients presenting to the ED with incidental PE can be treated with low-molecular-weight heparin anticoagulation and safely discharged. Avoidance of unnecessary hospitalization may decrease in-hospital infections and death, reduce healthcare costs, and improve patient quality of life. Because the natural history and optimal management of this condition is not well described, information supporting the creation of straightforward evidence-based practice guidelines for ED teams treating this specialized patient population is needed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5461224/ /pubmed/28589462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-017-0144-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Banala, Srinivas R.
Yeung, Sai-Ching Jim
Rice, Terry W.
Reyes-Gibby, Cielito C.
Wu, Carol C.
Todd, Knox H.
Peacock, W. Frank
Alagappan, Kumar
Discharge or admit? Emergency department management of incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a retrospective study
title Discharge or admit? Emergency department management of incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a retrospective study
title_full Discharge or admit? Emergency department management of incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Discharge or admit? Emergency department management of incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Discharge or admit? Emergency department management of incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a retrospective study
title_short Discharge or admit? Emergency department management of incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a retrospective study
title_sort discharge or admit? emergency department management of incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a retrospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5461224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28589462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-017-0144-9
work_keys_str_mv AT banalasrinivasr dischargeoradmitemergencydepartmentmanagementofincidentalpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithcanceraretrospectivestudy
AT yeungsaichingjim dischargeoradmitemergencydepartmentmanagementofincidentalpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithcanceraretrospectivestudy
AT riceterryw dischargeoradmitemergencydepartmentmanagementofincidentalpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithcanceraretrospectivestudy
AT reyesgibbycielitoc dischargeoradmitemergencydepartmentmanagementofincidentalpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithcanceraretrospectivestudy
AT wucarolc dischargeoradmitemergencydepartmentmanagementofincidentalpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithcanceraretrospectivestudy
AT toddknoxh dischargeoradmitemergencydepartmentmanagementofincidentalpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithcanceraretrospectivestudy
AT peacockwfrank dischargeoradmitemergencydepartmentmanagementofincidentalpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithcanceraretrospectivestudy
AT alagappankumar dischargeoradmitemergencydepartmentmanagementofincidentalpulmonaryembolisminpatientswithcanceraretrospectivestudy