Cargando…

At What Latency Does the Phase of Brain Oscillations Influence Perception?

Recent evidence has shown a rhythmic modulation of perception: prestimulus ongoing electroencephalography (EEG) phase in the θ (4–8 Hz) and α (8–13 Hz) bands has been directly linked with fluctuations in target detection. In fact, the ongoing EEG phase directly reflects cortical excitability: it act...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brüers, Sasskia, VanRullen, Rufin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5461555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0078-17.2017
_version_ 1783242355213598720
author Brüers, Sasskia
VanRullen, Rufin
author_facet Brüers, Sasskia
VanRullen, Rufin
author_sort Brüers, Sasskia
collection PubMed
description Recent evidence has shown a rhythmic modulation of perception: prestimulus ongoing electroencephalography (EEG) phase in the θ (4–8 Hz) and α (8–13 Hz) bands has been directly linked with fluctuations in target detection. In fact, the ongoing EEG phase directly reflects cortical excitability: it acts as a gating mechanism for information flow at the neuronal level. Consequently, the key phase modulating perception should be the one present in the brain when the stimulus is actually being processed. Most previous studies, however, reported phase modulation peaking 100 ms or more before target onset. To explain this discrepancy, we first use simulations showing that contamination of spontaneous oscillatory signals by target-evoked ERP and signal filtering (e.g., wavelet) can result in an apparent shift of the peak phase modulation towards earlier latencies, potentially reaching the prestimulus period. We then present a paradigm based on linear systems analysis which can uncover the true latency at which ongoing EEG phase influences perception. After measuring the impulse response function, we use it to reconstruct (rather than record) the brain activity of human observers during white noise sequences. We can then present targets in those sequences, and reliably estimate EEG phase around these targets without any influence of the target-evoked response. We find that in these reconstructed signals, the important phase for perception is that of fronto-occipital ∼6 Hz background oscillations at about 75 ms after target onset. These results confirm the causal influence of phase on perception at the time the stimulus is effectively processed in the brain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5461555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54615552017-06-07 At What Latency Does the Phase of Brain Oscillations Influence Perception? Brüers, Sasskia VanRullen, Rufin eNeuro New Research Recent evidence has shown a rhythmic modulation of perception: prestimulus ongoing electroencephalography (EEG) phase in the θ (4–8 Hz) and α (8–13 Hz) bands has been directly linked with fluctuations in target detection. In fact, the ongoing EEG phase directly reflects cortical excitability: it acts as a gating mechanism for information flow at the neuronal level. Consequently, the key phase modulating perception should be the one present in the brain when the stimulus is actually being processed. Most previous studies, however, reported phase modulation peaking 100 ms or more before target onset. To explain this discrepancy, we first use simulations showing that contamination of spontaneous oscillatory signals by target-evoked ERP and signal filtering (e.g., wavelet) can result in an apparent shift of the peak phase modulation towards earlier latencies, potentially reaching the prestimulus period. We then present a paradigm based on linear systems analysis which can uncover the true latency at which ongoing EEG phase influences perception. After measuring the impulse response function, we use it to reconstruct (rather than record) the brain activity of human observers during white noise sequences. We can then present targets in those sequences, and reliably estimate EEG phase around these targets without any influence of the target-evoked response. We find that in these reconstructed signals, the important phase for perception is that of fronto-occipital ∼6 Hz background oscillations at about 75 ms after target onset. These results confirm the causal influence of phase on perception at the time the stimulus is effectively processed in the brain. Society for Neuroscience 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5461555/ /pubmed/28593191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0078-17.2017 Text en Copyright © 2017 Brüers and VanRullen http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle New Research
Brüers, Sasskia
VanRullen, Rufin
At What Latency Does the Phase of Brain Oscillations Influence Perception?
title At What Latency Does the Phase of Brain Oscillations Influence Perception?
title_full At What Latency Does the Phase of Brain Oscillations Influence Perception?
title_fullStr At What Latency Does the Phase of Brain Oscillations Influence Perception?
title_full_unstemmed At What Latency Does the Phase of Brain Oscillations Influence Perception?
title_short At What Latency Does the Phase of Brain Oscillations Influence Perception?
title_sort at what latency does the phase of brain oscillations influence perception?
topic New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5461555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0078-17.2017
work_keys_str_mv AT bruerssasskia atwhatlatencydoesthephaseofbrainoscillationsinfluenceperception
AT vanrullenrufin atwhatlatencydoesthephaseofbrainoscillationsinfluenceperception