Cargando…

Cranioplasty: Indications, procedures, and outcome – An institutional experience

BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty, the repair of a skull vault defect by insertion of an object (bone or nonbiological materials such as metal or plastic plates), is a well-known procedure in modern neurosurgery. Brain protection and cosmetic aspects are the major indications of cranioplasty. A retroprospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrabi, Syed M., Sarmast, Arif H., Kirmani, Altaf R., Bhat, Abdul R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5461575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28607825
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_45_17
_version_ 1783242360308629504
author Andrabi, Syed M.
Sarmast, Arif H.
Kirmani, Altaf R.
Bhat, Abdul R.
author_facet Andrabi, Syed M.
Sarmast, Arif H.
Kirmani, Altaf R.
Bhat, Abdul R.
author_sort Andrabi, Syed M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty, the repair of a skull vault defect by insertion of an object (bone or nonbiological materials such as metal or plastic plates), is a well-known procedure in modern neurosurgery. Brain protection and cosmetic aspects are the major indications of cranioplasty. A retroprospective study was conducted for evaluating the indications, materials used, complications, and outcome of cranioplasty. METHODS: This study was prospective from August 2013 to September 2015 and retrospective from August 2010 to July 2013. In the retrospective study, patients files were retrieved from the mentioned date (August 2010 to July 2013) from the medical records and the findings were recorded. Abstracted data included age at the time of cranioplasty (years), sex (male or female), medical comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes), indications for craniectomy [Road traffic accident (RTA), fall from height (FFH), hit by stone or cricket ball, physical assault, stroke, infection, shell injury, bullet injury, and intraoperative swelling], laterality of cranioplasty (bilateral, unilateral, or bifrontal), time between craniectomy and cranioplasty (weeks), type of graft (autologous or artificial), type of prosthesis if used (methylmethacrylate, titanium), storage of bone flap if used (subcutaneous or deep freezer), operative time (minutes), and complications fallowing cranioplasty. RESULTS: Of the 236 patients included in the study, maximum were in the age group of 21–30 years i.e., 30.93% (n = 73). Mean age of the patients was 33.44 years. A total of 196 (83.05%) were autologous and 40 (16.95%) were artificial. Out of the 40 patients who underwent artificial cranioplasty, 36 (15.25%) had methylmethacrylate graft and 4 (1.7%) had titanium mesh implant. Bone was not preserved in 16.95% (n = 40), preserved in subcutaneous tissue in abdominal wall in 2.54% (n = 6), and preserved in deep freezer in 80.51% (n = 190) of the patients. CONCLUSION: Cranioplasty as a procedure is not without complications; however, if performed properly and at proper time with an aseptic technique, good results are achieved
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5461575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54615752017-06-12 Cranioplasty: Indications, procedures, and outcome – An institutional experience Andrabi, Syed M. Sarmast, Arif H. Kirmani, Altaf R. Bhat, Abdul R. Surg Neurol Int General Neurosurgery: Original Article BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty, the repair of a skull vault defect by insertion of an object (bone or nonbiological materials such as metal or plastic plates), is a well-known procedure in modern neurosurgery. Brain protection and cosmetic aspects are the major indications of cranioplasty. A retroprospective study was conducted for evaluating the indications, materials used, complications, and outcome of cranioplasty. METHODS: This study was prospective from August 2013 to September 2015 and retrospective from August 2010 to July 2013. In the retrospective study, patients files were retrieved from the mentioned date (August 2010 to July 2013) from the medical records and the findings were recorded. Abstracted data included age at the time of cranioplasty (years), sex (male or female), medical comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes), indications for craniectomy [Road traffic accident (RTA), fall from height (FFH), hit by stone or cricket ball, physical assault, stroke, infection, shell injury, bullet injury, and intraoperative swelling], laterality of cranioplasty (bilateral, unilateral, or bifrontal), time between craniectomy and cranioplasty (weeks), type of graft (autologous or artificial), type of prosthesis if used (methylmethacrylate, titanium), storage of bone flap if used (subcutaneous or deep freezer), operative time (minutes), and complications fallowing cranioplasty. RESULTS: Of the 236 patients included in the study, maximum were in the age group of 21–30 years i.e., 30.93% (n = 73). Mean age of the patients was 33.44 years. A total of 196 (83.05%) were autologous and 40 (16.95%) were artificial. Out of the 40 patients who underwent artificial cranioplasty, 36 (15.25%) had methylmethacrylate graft and 4 (1.7%) had titanium mesh implant. Bone was not preserved in 16.95% (n = 40), preserved in subcutaneous tissue in abdominal wall in 2.54% (n = 6), and preserved in deep freezer in 80.51% (n = 190) of the patients. CONCLUSION: Cranioplasty as a procedure is not without complications; however, if performed properly and at proper time with an aseptic technique, good results are achieved Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5461575/ /pubmed/28607825 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_45_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle General Neurosurgery: Original Article
Andrabi, Syed M.
Sarmast, Arif H.
Kirmani, Altaf R.
Bhat, Abdul R.
Cranioplasty: Indications, procedures, and outcome – An institutional experience
title Cranioplasty: Indications, procedures, and outcome – An institutional experience
title_full Cranioplasty: Indications, procedures, and outcome – An institutional experience
title_fullStr Cranioplasty: Indications, procedures, and outcome – An institutional experience
title_full_unstemmed Cranioplasty: Indications, procedures, and outcome – An institutional experience
title_short Cranioplasty: Indications, procedures, and outcome – An institutional experience
title_sort cranioplasty: indications, procedures, and outcome – an institutional experience
topic General Neurosurgery: Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5461575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28607825
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_45_17
work_keys_str_mv AT andrabisyedm cranioplastyindicationsproceduresandoutcomeaninstitutionalexperience
AT sarmastarifh cranioplastyindicationsproceduresandoutcomeaninstitutionalexperience
AT kirmanialtafr cranioplastyindicationsproceduresandoutcomeaninstitutionalexperience
AT bhatabdulr cranioplastyindicationsproceduresandoutcomeaninstitutionalexperience