Cargando…

Effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: An exploratory study

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal assessments of quality of life are needed to measure changes over the course of a disease and treatment. Computer versions of quality of life instruments have increased the feasibility of obtaining longitudinal measurements. However, there remain occasions when patients are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gil, Karen M, Frasure, Heidi E, Hopkins, Michael P, Jenison, Eric L, von Gruenigen, Vivian E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC546223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15655074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-6
_version_ 1782122257885167616
author Gil, Karen M
Frasure, Heidi E
Hopkins, Michael P
Jenison, Eric L
von Gruenigen, Vivian E
author_facet Gil, Karen M
Frasure, Heidi E
Hopkins, Michael P
Jenison, Eric L
von Gruenigen, Vivian E
author_sort Gil, Karen M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Longitudinal assessments of quality of life are needed to measure changes over the course of a disease and treatment. Computer versions of quality of life instruments have increased the feasibility of obtaining longitudinal measurements. However, there remain occasions when patients are not able to complete these questionnaires. This study examined whether changes measured using a computer version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (FACT-G) on two occasions would be obtained if patients completed a paper version on one of the two occasions. METHODS: Gynecologic oncology patients completed a computer version of the FACT-G pre-operatively and at six months. Patients were given the option of using the paper version instead of the computer at either time point. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients completed the FACT-G at both time points. Seventy-one (60%) patients used the computer at both visits, 26 (21.8%) used the computer followed by the paper version, 17 (14.3%) used the paper version followed by the computer version, and five patients (4.2%) used the paper version at both visits. Significant effects over time were obtained in the physical, functional, and emotional well-being domains, and in total scores, but there were no effects of method of administration of the questionnaires and no interaction between method of administration and changes over time. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that women are responding to the content of the questionnaire and not method of data collection. Although using the same method of administration of instruments over time is desirable, using alternate methods is preferable to forgoing data collection entirely. Large scale studies should be conducted to determine if the multiple methods of data collection that are becoming increasingly available are producing interchangeable information.
format Text
id pubmed-546223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5462232005-01-30 Effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: An exploratory study Gil, Karen M Frasure, Heidi E Hopkins, Michael P Jenison, Eric L von Gruenigen, Vivian E Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Longitudinal assessments of quality of life are needed to measure changes over the course of a disease and treatment. Computer versions of quality of life instruments have increased the feasibility of obtaining longitudinal measurements. However, there remain occasions when patients are not able to complete these questionnaires. This study examined whether changes measured using a computer version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (FACT-G) on two occasions would be obtained if patients completed a paper version on one of the two occasions. METHODS: Gynecologic oncology patients completed a computer version of the FACT-G pre-operatively and at six months. Patients were given the option of using the paper version instead of the computer at either time point. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients completed the FACT-G at both time points. Seventy-one (60%) patients used the computer at both visits, 26 (21.8%) used the computer followed by the paper version, 17 (14.3%) used the paper version followed by the computer version, and five patients (4.2%) used the paper version at both visits. Significant effects over time were obtained in the physical, functional, and emotional well-being domains, and in total scores, but there were no effects of method of administration of the questionnaires and no interaction between method of administration and changes over time. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that women are responding to the content of the questionnaire and not method of data collection. Although using the same method of administration of instruments over time is desirable, using alternate methods is preferable to forgoing data collection entirely. Large scale studies should be conducted to determine if the multiple methods of data collection that are becoming increasingly available are producing interchangeable information. BioMed Central 2005-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC546223/ /pubmed/15655074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-6 Text en Copyright © 2005 Gil et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Gil, Karen M
Frasure, Heidi E
Hopkins, Michael P
Jenison, Eric L
von Gruenigen, Vivian E
Effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: An exploratory study
title Effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: An exploratory study
title_full Effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: An exploratory study
title_fullStr Effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: An exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: An exploratory study
title_short Effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: An exploratory study
title_sort effect of method of administration on longitudinal assessment of quality of life in gynecologic cancer: an exploratory study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC546223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15655074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gilkarenm effectofmethodofadministrationonlongitudinalassessmentofqualityoflifeingynecologiccanceranexploratorystudy
AT frasureheidie effectofmethodofadministrationonlongitudinalassessmentofqualityoflifeingynecologiccanceranexploratorystudy
AT hopkinsmichaelp effectofmethodofadministrationonlongitudinalassessmentofqualityoflifeingynecologiccanceranexploratorystudy
AT jenisonericl effectofmethodofadministrationonlongitudinalassessmentofqualityoflifeingynecologiccanceranexploratorystudy
AT vongruenigenviviane effectofmethodofadministrationonlongitudinalassessmentofqualityoflifeingynecologiccanceranexploratorystudy