Cargando…
Moxibustion treatment for primary osteoporosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Primary osteoporosis (POP) has a serious impact on quality of life for middle-aged and elderly, which particularly increase the risk of fracture. We conducted the systematic review to evaluate the effects of moxibustion for POP in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Eight databases were searched fro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28591176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178688 |
_version_ | 1783242501811863552 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Fanping Huang, Minghua Jin, Yi Kong, Qingzhe Lei, Zhongmin Wei, Xu |
author_facet | Xu, Fanping Huang, Minghua Jin, Yi Kong, Qingzhe Lei, Zhongmin Wei, Xu |
author_sort | Xu, Fanping |
collection | PubMed |
description | Primary osteoporosis (POP) has a serious impact on quality of life for middle-aged and elderly, which particularly increase the risk of fracture. We conducted the systematic review to evaluate the effects of moxibustion for POP in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Eight databases were searched from their inception to July 30, 2016. The RCTs reporting the moxibustion as a monotherapy or in combination with conventional therapy for POP were enrolled. The outcomes might be fracture incidence, quality of life, clinical symptoms, death attributed to osteoporosis, adverse effect, bone mineral density (BMD), and biochemical indicators. Literature selection, data abstraction, quality evaluation, and data analysis were in accordance with Cochrane standards.Thirteen trials including 808 patients were included. Meta-analysis was not conducted because of the obvious clinical or statistical heterogeneity. Limited evidence suggested that moxibustion plus anti-osteoporosis medicine might be more effective in relieving the pain (visual analogue scale scores average changed 2 scores between groups, 4 trials), increasing the BMD of femoral neck (average changed 0.4 g/cm(2) between groups, 3 trials), and improving the level of bone gla protein, osteoprotegerin and bone alkaline phosphatase (2 trials) compared with anti-osteoporosis medicine alone. However, the quality of previous studies was evaluated as generally poor. The safety evidence of moxibustion was still insufficient. Due to the paucity of high-quality studies, there was no definite conclusion about the efficacy and safety of moxibustion treating POP although parts of positive results were presented. Future research should pay attention to the dose-response relation and fracture incidence of moxibustion for POP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5462379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54623792017-06-22 Moxibustion treatment for primary osteoporosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials Xu, Fanping Huang, Minghua Jin, Yi Kong, Qingzhe Lei, Zhongmin Wei, Xu PLoS One Research Article Primary osteoporosis (POP) has a serious impact on quality of life for middle-aged and elderly, which particularly increase the risk of fracture. We conducted the systematic review to evaluate the effects of moxibustion for POP in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Eight databases were searched from their inception to July 30, 2016. The RCTs reporting the moxibustion as a monotherapy or in combination with conventional therapy for POP were enrolled. The outcomes might be fracture incidence, quality of life, clinical symptoms, death attributed to osteoporosis, adverse effect, bone mineral density (BMD), and biochemical indicators. Literature selection, data abstraction, quality evaluation, and data analysis were in accordance with Cochrane standards.Thirteen trials including 808 patients were included. Meta-analysis was not conducted because of the obvious clinical or statistical heterogeneity. Limited evidence suggested that moxibustion plus anti-osteoporosis medicine might be more effective in relieving the pain (visual analogue scale scores average changed 2 scores between groups, 4 trials), increasing the BMD of femoral neck (average changed 0.4 g/cm(2) between groups, 3 trials), and improving the level of bone gla protein, osteoprotegerin and bone alkaline phosphatase (2 trials) compared with anti-osteoporosis medicine alone. However, the quality of previous studies was evaluated as generally poor. The safety evidence of moxibustion was still insufficient. Due to the paucity of high-quality studies, there was no definite conclusion about the efficacy and safety of moxibustion treating POP although parts of positive results were presented. Future research should pay attention to the dose-response relation and fracture incidence of moxibustion for POP. Public Library of Science 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5462379/ /pubmed/28591176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178688 Text en © 2017 Xu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xu, Fanping Huang, Minghua Jin, Yi Kong, Qingzhe Lei, Zhongmin Wei, Xu Moxibustion treatment for primary osteoporosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title | Moxibustion treatment for primary osteoporosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Moxibustion treatment for primary osteoporosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Moxibustion treatment for primary osteoporosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Moxibustion treatment for primary osteoporosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Moxibustion treatment for primary osteoporosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | moxibustion treatment for primary osteoporosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28591176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178688 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xufanping moxibustiontreatmentforprimaryosteoporosisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT huangminghua moxibustiontreatmentforprimaryosteoporosisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jinyi moxibustiontreatmentforprimaryosteoporosisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kongqingzhe moxibustiontreatmentforprimaryosteoporosisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT leizhongmin moxibustiontreatmentforprimaryosteoporosisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT weixu moxibustiontreatmentforprimaryosteoporosisasystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |