Cargando…

Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients

[Purpose] Gait analysis, such as portable gait rhythmogram (PGR) provides objective information that helps in the quantitative evaluation of human locomotion. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of PGR in post-stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] Two raters (A and B) examined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyata, Ryuji, Matsumoto, Shuji, Miura, Seiji, Kawamura, Kentaro, Uema, Tomohiro, Miyara, Kodai, Niibo, Ayana, Ogura, Tadashi, Shimodozono, Megumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.874
_version_ 1783242554112737280
author Miyata, Ryuji
Matsumoto, Shuji
Miura, Seiji
Kawamura, Kentaro
Uema, Tomohiro
Miyara, Kodai
Niibo, Ayana
Ogura, Tadashi
Shimodozono, Megumi
author_facet Miyata, Ryuji
Matsumoto, Shuji
Miura, Seiji
Kawamura, Kentaro
Uema, Tomohiro
Miyara, Kodai
Niibo, Ayana
Ogura, Tadashi
Shimodozono, Megumi
author_sort Miyata, Ryuji
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] Gait analysis, such as portable gait rhythmogram (PGR) provides objective information that helps in the quantitative evaluation of human locomotion. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of PGR in post-stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] Two raters (A and B) examined 44 post-stroke patients. To assess intra-rater reliability, rater A tested subjects on three separate occasions (Days 1, 2, and 3). To assess inter-rater reliability, raters A and B independently tested participants on the same occasion (Day 3). [Results] There was no significant systematic bias between test occasions or raters. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.93−0.97 for intra-rater reliability at both the comfortable speed and maximum speed, and 0.97−0.98 (comfortable speed) and 0.87−0.99 (maximum speed) for inter-rater reliability. The standard error was 1.25−1.49 (comfortable speed) and 1.62−1.77 (maximum speed) for intra-rater investigation, and 1.04−1.32 (comfortable speed) and 0.91−1.26 (maximum speed) for inter-rater investigation. At the 90% confidence level, the minimum detectable change ranged from 2.9−4.1%, and the error of an individual’s score at a given time point ranged from ±2.1−2.9%. [Conclusion] Based on this excellent reliability of the PGR in post-stroke patients, it can be recommended as a simple test of gait analysis in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5462690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54626902017-06-09 Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients Miyata, Ryuji Matsumoto, Shuji Miura, Seiji Kawamura, Kentaro Uema, Tomohiro Miyara, Kodai Niibo, Ayana Ogura, Tadashi Shimodozono, Megumi J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Gait analysis, such as portable gait rhythmogram (PGR) provides objective information that helps in the quantitative evaluation of human locomotion. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of PGR in post-stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] Two raters (A and B) examined 44 post-stroke patients. To assess intra-rater reliability, rater A tested subjects on three separate occasions (Days 1, 2, and 3). To assess inter-rater reliability, raters A and B independently tested participants on the same occasion (Day 3). [Results] There was no significant systematic bias between test occasions or raters. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.93−0.97 for intra-rater reliability at both the comfortable speed and maximum speed, and 0.97−0.98 (comfortable speed) and 0.87−0.99 (maximum speed) for inter-rater reliability. The standard error was 1.25−1.49 (comfortable speed) and 1.62−1.77 (maximum speed) for intra-rater investigation, and 1.04−1.32 (comfortable speed) and 0.91−1.26 (maximum speed) for inter-rater investigation. At the 90% confidence level, the minimum detectable change ranged from 2.9−4.1%, and the error of an individual’s score at a given time point ranged from ±2.1−2.9%. [Conclusion] Based on this excellent reliability of the PGR in post-stroke patients, it can be recommended as a simple test of gait analysis in this population. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017-05-16 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5462690/ /pubmed/28603363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.874 Text en 2017©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Miyata, Ryuji
Matsumoto, Shuji
Miura, Seiji
Kawamura, Kentaro
Uema, Tomohiro
Miyara, Kodai
Niibo, Ayana
Ogura, Tadashi
Shimodozono, Megumi
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients
title Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients
title_full Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients
title_fullStr Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients
title_full_unstemmed Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients
title_short Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients
title_sort intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.874
work_keys_str_mv AT miyataryuji intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients
AT matsumotoshuji intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients
AT miuraseiji intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients
AT kawamurakentaro intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients
AT uematomohiro intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients
AT miyarakodai intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients
AT niiboayana intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients
AT oguratadashi intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients
AT shimodozonomegumi intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients