Cargando…
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients
[Purpose] Gait analysis, such as portable gait rhythmogram (PGR) provides objective information that helps in the quantitative evaluation of human locomotion. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of PGR in post-stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] Two raters (A and B) examined...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.874 |
_version_ | 1783242554112737280 |
---|---|
author | Miyata, Ryuji Matsumoto, Shuji Miura, Seiji Kawamura, Kentaro Uema, Tomohiro Miyara, Kodai Niibo, Ayana Ogura, Tadashi Shimodozono, Megumi |
author_facet | Miyata, Ryuji Matsumoto, Shuji Miura, Seiji Kawamura, Kentaro Uema, Tomohiro Miyara, Kodai Niibo, Ayana Ogura, Tadashi Shimodozono, Megumi |
author_sort | Miyata, Ryuji |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] Gait analysis, such as portable gait rhythmogram (PGR) provides objective information that helps in the quantitative evaluation of human locomotion. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of PGR in post-stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] Two raters (A and B) examined 44 post-stroke patients. To assess intra-rater reliability, rater A tested subjects on three separate occasions (Days 1, 2, and 3). To assess inter-rater reliability, raters A and B independently tested participants on the same occasion (Day 3). [Results] There was no significant systematic bias between test occasions or raters. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.93−0.97 for intra-rater reliability at both the comfortable speed and maximum speed, and 0.97−0.98 (comfortable speed) and 0.87−0.99 (maximum speed) for inter-rater reliability. The standard error was 1.25−1.49 (comfortable speed) and 1.62−1.77 (maximum speed) for intra-rater investigation, and 1.04−1.32 (comfortable speed) and 0.91−1.26 (maximum speed) for inter-rater investigation. At the 90% confidence level, the minimum detectable change ranged from 2.9−4.1%, and the error of an individual’s score at a given time point ranged from ±2.1−2.9%. [Conclusion] Based on this excellent reliability of the PGR in post-stroke patients, it can be recommended as a simple test of gait analysis in this population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5462690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54626902017-06-09 Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients Miyata, Ryuji Matsumoto, Shuji Miura, Seiji Kawamura, Kentaro Uema, Tomohiro Miyara, Kodai Niibo, Ayana Ogura, Tadashi Shimodozono, Megumi J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Gait analysis, such as portable gait rhythmogram (PGR) provides objective information that helps in the quantitative evaluation of human locomotion. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of PGR in post-stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] Two raters (A and B) examined 44 post-stroke patients. To assess intra-rater reliability, rater A tested subjects on three separate occasions (Days 1, 2, and 3). To assess inter-rater reliability, raters A and B independently tested participants on the same occasion (Day 3). [Results] There was no significant systematic bias between test occasions or raters. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.93−0.97 for intra-rater reliability at both the comfortable speed and maximum speed, and 0.97−0.98 (comfortable speed) and 0.87−0.99 (maximum speed) for inter-rater reliability. The standard error was 1.25−1.49 (comfortable speed) and 1.62−1.77 (maximum speed) for intra-rater investigation, and 1.04−1.32 (comfortable speed) and 0.91−1.26 (maximum speed) for inter-rater investigation. At the 90% confidence level, the minimum detectable change ranged from 2.9−4.1%, and the error of an individual’s score at a given time point ranged from ±2.1−2.9%. [Conclusion] Based on this excellent reliability of the PGR in post-stroke patients, it can be recommended as a simple test of gait analysis in this population. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2017-05-16 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5462690/ /pubmed/28603363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.874 Text en 2017©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Miyata, Ryuji Matsumoto, Shuji Miura, Seiji Kawamura, Kentaro Uema, Tomohiro Miyara, Kodai Niibo, Ayana Ogura, Tadashi Shimodozono, Megumi Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in post-stroke patients |
title | Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in
post-stroke patients |
title_full | Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in
post-stroke patients |
title_fullStr | Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in
post-stroke patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in
post-stroke patients |
title_short | Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in
post-stroke patients |
title_sort | intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the portable gait rhythmogram in
post-stroke patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28603363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.874 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyataryuji intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients AT matsumotoshuji intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients AT miuraseiji intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients AT kawamurakentaro intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients AT uematomohiro intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients AT miyarakodai intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients AT niiboayana intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients AT oguratadashi intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients AT shimodozonomegumi intraraterandinterraterreliabilityoftheportablegaitrhythmograminpoststrokepatients |