Cargando…
Comparison of Different Drying Methods for Recovery of Mushroom DNA
Several methods have been reported for drying mushroom specimens for population genetic, taxonomic, and phylogenetic studies. However, most methods have not been directly compared for their effectiveness in preserving mushroom DNA. In this study, we compared silica gel drying at ambient temperature...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03570-7 |
_version_ | 1783242570391879680 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Shouxian Liu, Yu Xu, Jianping |
author_facet | Wang, Shouxian Liu, Yu Xu, Jianping |
author_sort | Wang, Shouxian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several methods have been reported for drying mushroom specimens for population genetic, taxonomic, and phylogenetic studies. However, most methods have not been directly compared for their effectiveness in preserving mushroom DNA. In this study, we compared silica gel drying at ambient temperature and oven drying at seven different temperatures. Two mushroom species representing two types of fruiting bodies were examined: the fleshy button mushroom Agaricus bisporus and the leathery shelf fungus Trametes versicolor. For each species dried with the eight methods, we assessed the mushroom water loss rate, the quality and quantity of extracted DNA, and the effectiveness of using the extracted DNA as a template for PCR amplification of two DNA fragments (ITS and a single copy gene). Dried specimens from all tested methods yielded sufficient DNA for PCR amplification of the two genes in both species. However, differences among the methods for the two species were found in: (i) the time required by different drying methods for the fresh mushroom tissue to reach a stable weight; and (ii) the relative quality and quantity of the extracted genomic DNA. Among these methods, oven drying at 70 °C for 3–4 h seemed the most efficient for preserving field mushroom samples for subsequent molecular work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5462775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54627752017-06-08 Comparison of Different Drying Methods for Recovery of Mushroom DNA Wang, Shouxian Liu, Yu Xu, Jianping Sci Rep Article Several methods have been reported for drying mushroom specimens for population genetic, taxonomic, and phylogenetic studies. However, most methods have not been directly compared for their effectiveness in preserving mushroom DNA. In this study, we compared silica gel drying at ambient temperature and oven drying at seven different temperatures. Two mushroom species representing two types of fruiting bodies were examined: the fleshy button mushroom Agaricus bisporus and the leathery shelf fungus Trametes versicolor. For each species dried with the eight methods, we assessed the mushroom water loss rate, the quality and quantity of extracted DNA, and the effectiveness of using the extracted DNA as a template for PCR amplification of two DNA fragments (ITS and a single copy gene). Dried specimens from all tested methods yielded sufficient DNA for PCR amplification of the two genes in both species. However, differences among the methods for the two species were found in: (i) the time required by different drying methods for the fresh mushroom tissue to reach a stable weight; and (ii) the relative quality and quantity of the extracted genomic DNA. Among these methods, oven drying at 70 °C for 3–4 h seemed the most efficient for preserving field mushroom samples for subsequent molecular work. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5462775/ /pubmed/28592865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03570-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Shouxian Liu, Yu Xu, Jianping Comparison of Different Drying Methods for Recovery of Mushroom DNA |
title | Comparison of Different Drying Methods for Recovery of Mushroom DNA |
title_full | Comparison of Different Drying Methods for Recovery of Mushroom DNA |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Drying Methods for Recovery of Mushroom DNA |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Drying Methods for Recovery of Mushroom DNA |
title_short | Comparison of Different Drying Methods for Recovery of Mushroom DNA |
title_sort | comparison of different drying methods for recovery of mushroom dna |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03570-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangshouxian comparisonofdifferentdryingmethodsforrecoveryofmushroomdna AT liuyu comparisonofdifferentdryingmethodsforrecoveryofmushroomdna AT xujianping comparisonofdifferentdryingmethodsforrecoveryofmushroomdna |