Cargando…

Impact of B-Scan Averaging on Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Image Quality before and after Cataract Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine optimal image averaging settings for Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with and without cataract. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study, the eyes were imaged before and after cataract surgery using seven different ima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Podkowinski, Dominika, Sharian Varnousfaderani, Ehsan, Simader, Christian, Bogunovic, Hrvoje, Philip, Ana-Maria, Gerendas, Bianca S., Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula, Waldstein, Sebastian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5463191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28630764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8148047
_version_ 1783242663217070080
author Podkowinski, Dominika
Sharian Varnousfaderani, Ehsan
Simader, Christian
Bogunovic, Hrvoje
Philip, Ana-Maria
Gerendas, Bianca S.
Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula
Waldstein, Sebastian M.
author_facet Podkowinski, Dominika
Sharian Varnousfaderani, Ehsan
Simader, Christian
Bogunovic, Hrvoje
Philip, Ana-Maria
Gerendas, Bianca S.
Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula
Waldstein, Sebastian M.
author_sort Podkowinski, Dominika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine optimal image averaging settings for Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with and without cataract. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study, the eyes were imaged before and after cataract surgery using seven different image averaging settings. Image quality was quantitatively evaluated using signal-to-noise ratio, distinction between retinal layer image intensity distributions, and retinal layer segmentation performance. Measures were compared pre- and postoperatively across different degrees of averaging. RESULTS: 13 eyes of 13 patients were included and 1092 layer boundaries analyzed. Preoperatively, increasing image averaging led to a logarithmic growth in all image quality measures up to 96 frames. Postoperatively, increasing averaging beyond 16 images resulted in a plateau without further benefits to image quality. Averaging 16 frames postoperatively provided comparable image quality to 96 frames preoperatively. CONCLUSION: In patients with clear media, averaging 16 images provided optimal signal quality. A further increase in averaging was only beneficial in the eyes with senile cataract. However, prolonged acquisition time and possible loss of details have to be taken into account.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5463191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54631912017-06-19 Impact of B-Scan Averaging on Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Image Quality before and after Cataract Surgery Podkowinski, Dominika Sharian Varnousfaderani, Ehsan Simader, Christian Bogunovic, Hrvoje Philip, Ana-Maria Gerendas, Bianca S. Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula Waldstein, Sebastian M. J Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine optimal image averaging settings for Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with and without cataract. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study, the eyes were imaged before and after cataract surgery using seven different image averaging settings. Image quality was quantitatively evaluated using signal-to-noise ratio, distinction between retinal layer image intensity distributions, and retinal layer segmentation performance. Measures were compared pre- and postoperatively across different degrees of averaging. RESULTS: 13 eyes of 13 patients were included and 1092 layer boundaries analyzed. Preoperatively, increasing image averaging led to a logarithmic growth in all image quality measures up to 96 frames. Postoperatively, increasing averaging beyond 16 images resulted in a plateau without further benefits to image quality. Averaging 16 frames postoperatively provided comparable image quality to 96 frames preoperatively. CONCLUSION: In patients with clear media, averaging 16 images provided optimal signal quality. A further increase in averaging was only beneficial in the eyes with senile cataract. However, prolonged acquisition time and possible loss of details have to be taken into account. Hindawi 2017 2017-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5463191/ /pubmed/28630764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8148047 Text en Copyright © 2017 Dominika Podkowinski et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Podkowinski, Dominika
Sharian Varnousfaderani, Ehsan
Simader, Christian
Bogunovic, Hrvoje
Philip, Ana-Maria
Gerendas, Bianca S.
Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula
Waldstein, Sebastian M.
Impact of B-Scan Averaging on Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Image Quality before and after Cataract Surgery
title Impact of B-Scan Averaging on Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Image Quality before and after Cataract Surgery
title_full Impact of B-Scan Averaging on Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Image Quality before and after Cataract Surgery
title_fullStr Impact of B-Scan Averaging on Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Image Quality before and after Cataract Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Impact of B-Scan Averaging on Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Image Quality before and after Cataract Surgery
title_short Impact of B-Scan Averaging on Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Image Quality before and after Cataract Surgery
title_sort impact of b-scan averaging on spectralis optical coherence tomography image quality before and after cataract surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5463191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28630764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8148047
work_keys_str_mv AT podkowinskidominika impactofbscanaveragingonspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyimagequalitybeforeandaftercataractsurgery
AT sharianvarnousfaderaniehsan impactofbscanaveragingonspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyimagequalitybeforeandaftercataractsurgery
AT simaderchristian impactofbscanaveragingonspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyimagequalitybeforeandaftercataractsurgery
AT bogunovichrvoje impactofbscanaveragingonspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyimagequalitybeforeandaftercataractsurgery
AT philipanamaria impactofbscanaveragingonspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyimagequalitybeforeandaftercataractsurgery
AT gerendasbiancas impactofbscanaveragingonspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyimagequalitybeforeandaftercataractsurgery
AT schmidterfurthursula impactofbscanaveragingonspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyimagequalitybeforeandaftercataractsurgery
AT waldsteinsebastianm impactofbscanaveragingonspectralisopticalcoherencetomographyimagequalitybeforeandaftercataractsurgery