Cargando…

Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study)

BACKGROUND: Despite the lack of scientific studies on biofield therapies, they are widely acclaimed by patients. The mechanisms of action are not explained by current allopathic medical approaches. Warts are common and contagious viral lesions that may be refractory to standard dermatologic treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaillard, Cathy, Allain, Laure, Legros, Hélène, Brucato, Sylvie, Desgue, Yohann, Rouillon, Christophe, Peyro-Saint-Paul, Laure, Dompmartin, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5463300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1994-4
_version_ 1783242677837365248
author Gaillard, Cathy
Allain, Laure
Legros, Hélène
Brucato, Sylvie
Desgue, Yohann
Rouillon, Christophe
Peyro-Saint-Paul, Laure
Dompmartin, Anne
author_facet Gaillard, Cathy
Allain, Laure
Legros, Hélène
Brucato, Sylvie
Desgue, Yohann
Rouillon, Christophe
Peyro-Saint-Paul, Laure
Dompmartin, Anne
author_sort Gaillard, Cathy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the lack of scientific studies on biofield therapies, they are widely acclaimed by patients. The mechanisms of action are not explained by current allopathic medical approaches. Warts are common and contagious viral lesions that may be refractory to standard dermatologic treatments such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, and keratolytic ointments. Biofield therapies are efficient in various pathologies. Their ability to treat warts has never been demonstrated in a scientific study with a robust methodology. Patients with refractory warts often place their trust in these alternative therapies because of the poor results obtained from traditional medicine. We propose a prospective, randomized, single-blind, assessor-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of treatment of warts by biofield therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: Subjects with warts on their feet or hands will be randomized into two groups: real biofield therapy versus sham therapy. The diagnosis will be made at the time of inclusion, and follow-up will take place in week 3. Comparison of pictures of the warts at baseline and after 3 weeks will be used as the primary outcome measure. The hypothesis is that the extent of the disappearance of the original wart in the group treated by real biofield therapy will be 70% and that it will be 30% in the group treated by sham therapy. Using 90% power and an alpha risk of 5%, 31 subjects are required in each group for a two-tailed proportion comparison test. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of biofield therapy on warts. Therefore, the aim of this study is to extend knowledge of biofield therapy to another area of medicine such as dermatology and to propose complementary or alternative practices to improve patient well-being. The main strength of the study is that it is a randomized, single-blind, assessor-blind, placebo-controlled study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02773719. Registered on 22 April 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1994-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5463300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54633002017-06-08 Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study) Gaillard, Cathy Allain, Laure Legros, Hélène Brucato, Sylvie Desgue, Yohann Rouillon, Christophe Peyro-Saint-Paul, Laure Dompmartin, Anne Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite the lack of scientific studies on biofield therapies, they are widely acclaimed by patients. The mechanisms of action are not explained by current allopathic medical approaches. Warts are common and contagious viral lesions that may be refractory to standard dermatologic treatments such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, and keratolytic ointments. Biofield therapies are efficient in various pathologies. Their ability to treat warts has never been demonstrated in a scientific study with a robust methodology. Patients with refractory warts often place their trust in these alternative therapies because of the poor results obtained from traditional medicine. We propose a prospective, randomized, single-blind, assessor-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of treatment of warts by biofield therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: Subjects with warts on their feet or hands will be randomized into two groups: real biofield therapy versus sham therapy. The diagnosis will be made at the time of inclusion, and follow-up will take place in week 3. Comparison of pictures of the warts at baseline and after 3 weeks will be used as the primary outcome measure. The hypothesis is that the extent of the disappearance of the original wart in the group treated by real biofield therapy will be 70% and that it will be 30% in the group treated by sham therapy. Using 90% power and an alpha risk of 5%, 31 subjects are required in each group for a two-tailed proportion comparison test. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of biofield therapy on warts. Therefore, the aim of this study is to extend knowledge of biofield therapy to another area of medicine such as dermatology and to propose complementary or alternative practices to improve patient well-being. The main strength of the study is that it is a randomized, single-blind, assessor-blind, placebo-controlled study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02773719. Registered on 22 April 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1994-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5463300/ /pubmed/28592299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1994-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Gaillard, Cathy
Allain, Laure
Legros, Hélène
Brucato, Sylvie
Desgue, Yohann
Rouillon, Christophe
Peyro-Saint-Paul, Laure
Dompmartin, Anne
Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study)
title Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study)
title_full Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study)
title_fullStr Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study)
title_full_unstemmed Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study)
title_short Real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (MAGNETIK study)
title_sort real versus sham proximal biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (magnetik study)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5463300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1994-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gaillardcathy realversusshamproximalbiofieldtherapyinthetreatmentofwartsofthehandsandfeetinadultsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialmagnetikstudy
AT allainlaure realversusshamproximalbiofieldtherapyinthetreatmentofwartsofthehandsandfeetinadultsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialmagnetikstudy
AT legroshelene realversusshamproximalbiofieldtherapyinthetreatmentofwartsofthehandsandfeetinadultsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialmagnetikstudy
AT brucatosylvie realversusshamproximalbiofieldtherapyinthetreatmentofwartsofthehandsandfeetinadultsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialmagnetikstudy
AT desgueyohann realversusshamproximalbiofieldtherapyinthetreatmentofwartsofthehandsandfeetinadultsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialmagnetikstudy
AT rouillonchristophe realversusshamproximalbiofieldtherapyinthetreatmentofwartsofthehandsandfeetinadultsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialmagnetikstudy
AT peyrosaintpaullaure realversusshamproximalbiofieldtherapyinthetreatmentofwartsofthehandsandfeetinadultsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialmagnetikstudy
AT dompmartinanne realversusshamproximalbiofieldtherapyinthetreatmentofwartsofthehandsandfeetinadultsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialmagnetikstudy