Cargando…

Optimal Modality for Detecting Distant Metastasis in Primary Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma during Initial Staging: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of 1774 Patients

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of two modalities commonly used for detecting distant metastasis in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC): (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and conventional work-ups (CWUs). Methods: All top...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Cheng, Zhang, Yuan, Peng, Liang, Liu, Xu, Li, Wen-Fei, Sun, Ying, Zhang, Xu, Lin, Xiao-Ping, Liu, Qing, Ma, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5463439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28607599
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.18361
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of two modalities commonly used for detecting distant metastasis in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC): (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and conventional work-ups (CWUs). Methods: All topic-related studies were comprehensively searched and included. We determined sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated negative and positive likelihood ratios (LR- and LR+, respectively), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves. Moreover, we compared the diagnostic performance of PET/CT and CWUs by analyzing studies that reported the results of these diagnostic methods on the same patients. Results: The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 98.1% for PET/CT (1474 patients), and 38.0% and 97.6% for CWUs (1329 patients). In the head-to-head comparison of PET/CT and CWUs (1029 patients), PET/CT showed a significantly higher sensitivity (83.7% vs. 40.1%, P < 0.001) and lower LR- (0.169 vs. 0.633, P < 0.001) than CWUs on a per-patient basis; no significant difference was observed in pooled specificity (97.7% vs. 97.8%, P = 0.892) or LR+ (36.416 vs. 16.845, P = 0.149). The superiority of PET/CT over CWUs was due mainly to the better diagnostic performance on bone metastasis. However, suboptimal sensitivity of PET/CT was reported in the aspect of detection of liver metastasis. Sensitivity analyses showed relatively poor sensitivity and LR- of PET/CT compared to the original analysis. Conclusions: PET/CT was superior to CWUs in detecting distant metastasis in primary NPC. However, the efficacy of PET/CT in detecting liver metastasis still requires further optimization.