Cargando…

The endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (Oral-FEES, O-FEES): a pilot study of the clinical use of a new procedure

Oral FEES (O-FEES) is an endoscopic procedure conceived to directly visualise the oral phase of swallowing. In the perspective of clinical use, the feasibility, safety and acceptability of O-FEES has been evaluated. Subsequently, the procedure was compared with the radiological gold standard. The ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farneti, D., Fattori, B., Bastiani, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore SRL 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5463509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28516963
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-1126
_version_ 1783242724215881728
author Farneti, D.
Fattori, B.
Bastiani, L.
author_facet Farneti, D.
Fattori, B.
Bastiani, L.
author_sort Farneti, D.
collection PubMed
description Oral FEES (O-FEES) is an endoscopic procedure conceived to directly visualise the oral phase of swallowing. In the perspective of clinical use, the feasibility, safety and acceptability of O-FEES has been evaluated. Subsequently, the procedure was compared with the radiological gold standard. The acceptability of O-FEES was compared to that of FEES using a 10 point questionnaire submitted to a sample of 52 outpatients complaining of swallowing disorders. Repeated measure analysis of variance (rm-ANOVA) models were used to test the mean difference of acceptability in the same subjects after FEES and O-FEES. Subsequently, another sample of 8 male outpatients underwent a simultaneous O-FEES and videofluoroscopic study (VFSS). The inter-rater reliability using 10 radiological landmarks, compared to O-FEES, was blindly determined between two raters. Inter-rater agreement between the two judges for O-FEES and VFSS scores was assessed with the single score intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Differences between FEES and O-FEES answers for each question and among all the items considered overall were statistically significant (rm-ANOVA; F-statistic p < 0.001). The inter-rater agreement concerning endoscopic and radiological evaluations between the two raters showed strong values of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) (95% confidence interval): 0.875 (0.373-0.979) and 0.921 (0.542-0.986), respectively. The Bland-Altman test showed a bias of -0.24 (95% limits of agreement; -1.77 to +1.19), which suggests that both methods produced almost identical results. In clinical practice and compared with FEES, O-FEES is a well tolerated and safe procedure. Compared with the radiological gold standard, O-FEES offers reliable information about oral preparation and oral propulsion of the bolus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5463509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Pacini Editore SRL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54635092017-06-14 The endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (Oral-FEES, O-FEES): a pilot study of the clinical use of a new procedure Farneti, D. Fattori, B. Bastiani, L. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Dysphagia Oral FEES (O-FEES) is an endoscopic procedure conceived to directly visualise the oral phase of swallowing. In the perspective of clinical use, the feasibility, safety and acceptability of O-FEES has been evaluated. Subsequently, the procedure was compared with the radiological gold standard. The acceptability of O-FEES was compared to that of FEES using a 10 point questionnaire submitted to a sample of 52 outpatients complaining of swallowing disorders. Repeated measure analysis of variance (rm-ANOVA) models were used to test the mean difference of acceptability in the same subjects after FEES and O-FEES. Subsequently, another sample of 8 male outpatients underwent a simultaneous O-FEES and videofluoroscopic study (VFSS). The inter-rater reliability using 10 radiological landmarks, compared to O-FEES, was blindly determined between two raters. Inter-rater agreement between the two judges for O-FEES and VFSS scores was assessed with the single score intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Differences between FEES and O-FEES answers for each question and among all the items considered overall were statistically significant (rm-ANOVA; F-statistic p < 0.001). The inter-rater agreement concerning endoscopic and radiological evaluations between the two raters showed strong values of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) (95% confidence interval): 0.875 (0.373-0.979) and 0.921 (0.542-0.986), respectively. The Bland-Altman test showed a bias of -0.24 (95% limits of agreement; -1.77 to +1.19), which suggests that both methods produced almost identical results. In clinical practice and compared with FEES, O-FEES is a well tolerated and safe procedure. Compared with the radiological gold standard, O-FEES offers reliable information about oral preparation and oral propulsion of the bolus. Pacini Editore SRL 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5463509/ /pubmed/28516963 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-1126 Text en © Copyright by Società Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License, which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any digital medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. For details, please refer to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Dysphagia
Farneti, D.
Fattori, B.
Bastiani, L.
The endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (Oral-FEES, O-FEES): a pilot study of the clinical use of a new procedure
title The endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (Oral-FEES, O-FEES): a pilot study of the clinical use of a new procedure
title_full The endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (Oral-FEES, O-FEES): a pilot study of the clinical use of a new procedure
title_fullStr The endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (Oral-FEES, O-FEES): a pilot study of the clinical use of a new procedure
title_full_unstemmed The endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (Oral-FEES, O-FEES): a pilot study of the clinical use of a new procedure
title_short The endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (Oral-FEES, O-FEES): a pilot study of the clinical use of a new procedure
title_sort endoscopic evaluation of the oral phase of swallowing (oral-fees, o-fees): a pilot study of the clinical use of a new procedure
topic Dysphagia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5463509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28516963
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-1126
work_keys_str_mv AT farnetid theendoscopicevaluationoftheoralphaseofswallowingoralfeesofeesapilotstudyoftheclinicaluseofanewprocedure
AT fattorib theendoscopicevaluationoftheoralphaseofswallowingoralfeesofeesapilotstudyoftheclinicaluseofanewprocedure
AT bastianil theendoscopicevaluationoftheoralphaseofswallowingoralfeesofeesapilotstudyoftheclinicaluseofanewprocedure
AT farnetid endoscopicevaluationoftheoralphaseofswallowingoralfeesofeesapilotstudyoftheclinicaluseofanewprocedure
AT fattorib endoscopicevaluationoftheoralphaseofswallowingoralfeesofeesapilotstudyoftheclinicaluseofanewprocedure
AT bastianil endoscopicevaluationoftheoralphaseofswallowingoralfeesofeesapilotstudyoftheclinicaluseofanewprocedure