Cargando…

Noninvasive assessment of respiratory muscle strength and activity in Myotonic dystrophy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sensitivity/specificity of the maximum relaxation rate (MRR) of inspiratory muscles, amplitude of electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), scalene (SCA), parasternal (2(nd)IS) and rectus abdominis (RA) muscles; lung function and respiratory muscle strength...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evangelista, Morgana de Araújo, Dias, Fernando Augusto Lavezzo, Dourado Júnior, Mário Emílio Teixeira, do Nascimento, George Carlos, Sarmento, Antonio, Gualdi, Lucien Peroni, Aliverti, Andrea, Resqueti, Vanessa, Fregonezi, Guilherme Augusto de Freitas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177318
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sensitivity/specificity of the maximum relaxation rate (MRR) of inspiratory muscles, amplitude of electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), scalene (SCA), parasternal (2(nd)IS) and rectus abdominis (RA) muscles; lung function and respiratory muscle strength in subjects with Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM(1)) compared with healthy subjects. DESIGN AND METHODS: Quasi-experimental observational study with control group. MRR of inspiratory muscles, lung function and amplitude of the electromyographic activity of SCM, SCA, 2(nd)IS and RA muscles during maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax), maximum expiratory pressure (PEmax) and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) tests were assessed in eighteen DM(1) subjects and eleven healthy. RESULTS: MRR was lower in DM(1) group compared to healthy (P = 0.001) and was considered sensitive and specific to identify disease in DM(1) and discard it in controls, as well as SNIP% (P = 0.0026), PImax% (P = 0.0077) and PEmax% (P = 0.0002). Contraction time of SCM and SCA was higher in DM(1) compared to controls, respectively, during PImax (P = 0.023 and P = 0.017) and SNIP (P = 0.015 and P = .0004). The DM(1) group showed lower PImax (P = .0006), PEmax (P = 0.0002), SNIP (P = 0.0014), and higher electromyographic activity of the SCM (P = 0.002) and SCA (P = 0.004) at rest; of 2(nd)IS (P = 0.003) during PEmax and of SCM (P = 0.02) and SCA (P = 0.03) during SNIP test. CONCLUSIONS: MD(1) subjects presented restrictive pattern, reduced respiratory muscle strength, muscular electrical activity and MRR when compared to higher compared to controls. In addition, the lower MRR found in MD(1) subjects showed to be reliable to sensitivity and specificity in identifying the delayed relaxation of respiratory muscles.