Cargando…
Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all
This study addresses the question of whether native Mandarin Chinese speakers process and comprehend subject-extracted relative clauses (SRC) more readily than object-extracted relative clauses (ORC) in Mandarin Chinese. Presently, this has been a hotly debated issue, with various studies producing...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178369 |
_version_ | 1783242798057652224 |
---|---|
author | Mansbridge, Michael P. Tamaoka, Katsuo Xiong, Kexin Verdonschot, Rinus G. |
author_facet | Mansbridge, Michael P. Tamaoka, Katsuo Xiong, Kexin Verdonschot, Rinus G. |
author_sort | Mansbridge, Michael P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study addresses the question of whether native Mandarin Chinese speakers process and comprehend subject-extracted relative clauses (SRC) more readily than object-extracted relative clauses (ORC) in Mandarin Chinese. Presently, this has been a hotly debated issue, with various studies producing contrasting results. Using two eye-tracking experiments with ambiguous and unambiguous RCs, this study shows that both ORCs and SRCs have different processing requirements depending on the locus and time course during reading. The results reveal that ORC reading was possibly facilitated by linear/temporal integration and canonicity. On the other hand, similarity-based interference made ORCs more difficult, and expectation-based processing was more prominent for unambiguous ORCs. Overall, RC processing in Mandarin should not be broken down to a single ORC (dis)advantage, but understood as multiple interdependent factors influencing whether ORCs are either more difficult or easier to parse depending on the task and context at hand. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5464565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54645652017-06-22 Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all Mansbridge, Michael P. Tamaoka, Katsuo Xiong, Kexin Verdonschot, Rinus G. PLoS One Research Article This study addresses the question of whether native Mandarin Chinese speakers process and comprehend subject-extracted relative clauses (SRC) more readily than object-extracted relative clauses (ORC) in Mandarin Chinese. Presently, this has been a hotly debated issue, with various studies producing contrasting results. Using two eye-tracking experiments with ambiguous and unambiguous RCs, this study shows that both ORCs and SRCs have different processing requirements depending on the locus and time course during reading. The results reveal that ORC reading was possibly facilitated by linear/temporal integration and canonicity. On the other hand, similarity-based interference made ORCs more difficult, and expectation-based processing was more prominent for unambiguous ORCs. Overall, RC processing in Mandarin should not be broken down to a single ORC (dis)advantage, but understood as multiple interdependent factors influencing whether ORCs are either more difficult or easier to parse depending on the task and context at hand. Public Library of Science 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5464565/ /pubmed/28594939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178369 Text en © 2017 Mansbridge et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mansbridge, Michael P. Tamaoka, Katsuo Xiong, Kexin Verdonschot, Rinus G. Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all |
title | Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all |
title_full | Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all |
title_fullStr | Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all |
title_full_unstemmed | Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all |
title_short | Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all |
title_sort | ambiguity in the processing of mandarin chinese relative clauses: one factor cannot explain it all |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mansbridgemichaelp ambiguityintheprocessingofmandarinchineserelativeclausesonefactorcannotexplainitall AT tamaokakatsuo ambiguityintheprocessingofmandarinchineserelativeclausesonefactorcannotexplainitall AT xiongkexin ambiguityintheprocessingofmandarinchineserelativeclausesonefactorcannotexplainitall AT verdonschotrinusg ambiguityintheprocessingofmandarinchineserelativeclausesonefactorcannotexplainitall |