Cargando…

Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all

This study addresses the question of whether native Mandarin Chinese speakers process and comprehend subject-extracted relative clauses (SRC) more readily than object-extracted relative clauses (ORC) in Mandarin Chinese. Presently, this has been a hotly debated issue, with various studies producing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansbridge, Michael P., Tamaoka, Katsuo, Xiong, Kexin, Verdonschot, Rinus G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178369
_version_ 1783242798057652224
author Mansbridge, Michael P.
Tamaoka, Katsuo
Xiong, Kexin
Verdonschot, Rinus G.
author_facet Mansbridge, Michael P.
Tamaoka, Katsuo
Xiong, Kexin
Verdonschot, Rinus G.
author_sort Mansbridge, Michael P.
collection PubMed
description This study addresses the question of whether native Mandarin Chinese speakers process and comprehend subject-extracted relative clauses (SRC) more readily than object-extracted relative clauses (ORC) in Mandarin Chinese. Presently, this has been a hotly debated issue, with various studies producing contrasting results. Using two eye-tracking experiments with ambiguous and unambiguous RCs, this study shows that both ORCs and SRCs have different processing requirements depending on the locus and time course during reading. The results reveal that ORC reading was possibly facilitated by linear/temporal integration and canonicity. On the other hand, similarity-based interference made ORCs more difficult, and expectation-based processing was more prominent for unambiguous ORCs. Overall, RC processing in Mandarin should not be broken down to a single ORC (dis)advantage, but understood as multiple interdependent factors influencing whether ORCs are either more difficult or easier to parse depending on the task and context at hand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5464565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54645652017-06-22 Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all Mansbridge, Michael P. Tamaoka, Katsuo Xiong, Kexin Verdonschot, Rinus G. PLoS One Research Article This study addresses the question of whether native Mandarin Chinese speakers process and comprehend subject-extracted relative clauses (SRC) more readily than object-extracted relative clauses (ORC) in Mandarin Chinese. Presently, this has been a hotly debated issue, with various studies producing contrasting results. Using two eye-tracking experiments with ambiguous and unambiguous RCs, this study shows that both ORCs and SRCs have different processing requirements depending on the locus and time course during reading. The results reveal that ORC reading was possibly facilitated by linear/temporal integration and canonicity. On the other hand, similarity-based interference made ORCs more difficult, and expectation-based processing was more prominent for unambiguous ORCs. Overall, RC processing in Mandarin should not be broken down to a single ORC (dis)advantage, but understood as multiple interdependent factors influencing whether ORCs are either more difficult or easier to parse depending on the task and context at hand. Public Library of Science 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5464565/ /pubmed/28594939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178369 Text en © 2017 Mansbridge et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mansbridge, Michael P.
Tamaoka, Katsuo
Xiong, Kexin
Verdonschot, Rinus G.
Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all
title Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all
title_full Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all
title_fullStr Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all
title_full_unstemmed Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all
title_short Ambiguity in the processing of Mandarin Chinese relative clauses: One factor cannot explain it all
title_sort ambiguity in the processing of mandarin chinese relative clauses: one factor cannot explain it all
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178369
work_keys_str_mv AT mansbridgemichaelp ambiguityintheprocessingofmandarinchineserelativeclausesonefactorcannotexplainitall
AT tamaokakatsuo ambiguityintheprocessingofmandarinchineserelativeclausesonefactorcannotexplainitall
AT xiongkexin ambiguityintheprocessingofmandarinchineserelativeclausesonefactorcannotexplainitall
AT verdonschotrinusg ambiguityintheprocessingofmandarinchineserelativeclausesonefactorcannotexplainitall