Cargando…

Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda

AIM: An evaluation exercise was carried out to assess the performance of Community Animal Health Workers (CAHWs) in the delivery of animal health care services in Karamoja region, identify capacity gaps and recommend remedial measures. MATERIALS & METHODS: Participatory methods were used to desi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bugeza, James, Kankya, Clovice, Muleme, James, Akandinda, Ann, Sserugga, Joseph, Nantima, Noelina, Okori, Edward, Odoch, Terence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179110
_version_ 1783242808090427392
author Bugeza, James
Kankya, Clovice
Muleme, James
Akandinda, Ann
Sserugga, Joseph
Nantima, Noelina
Okori, Edward
Odoch, Terence
author_facet Bugeza, James
Kankya, Clovice
Muleme, James
Akandinda, Ann
Sserugga, Joseph
Nantima, Noelina
Okori, Edward
Odoch, Terence
author_sort Bugeza, James
collection PubMed
description AIM: An evaluation exercise was carried out to assess the performance of Community Animal Health Workers (CAHWs) in the delivery of animal health care services in Karamoja region, identify capacity gaps and recommend remedial measures. MATERIALS & METHODS: Participatory methods were used to design data collection tools. Questionnaires were administered to 204 CAHWs, 215 farmers and 7 District Veterinary Officers (DVOs) to collect quantitative data. Seven DVOs and 1 Non Government Organization (NGO) representative were interviewed as key informants and one focus group discussion was conducted with a farmer group in Nakapiripirit to collect qualitative data. Questionnaire data was analyzed using SPSS version 19. Key messages from interviews and the focus group discussion were recorded in a notebook and reported verbatim. RESULTS: 70% of the farmers revealed that CAHWs are the most readily available animal health care service providers in their respective villages. CAHWs were instrumental in treatment of sick animals, disease surveillance, control of external parasites, animal production, vaccination, reporting, animal identification, and performing minor surgeries. Regarding their overall performance 88.8%(191/215) of the farmers said they were impressed. The main challenges faced by the CAHWs were inadequate facilitation, lack of tools and equipments, unwillingness of government to integrate them into the formal extension system, poor information flow, limited technical capacity to diagnose diseases, unwillingness of farmers to pay for services and sustainability issues. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: CAHWs remain the main source of animal health care services in Karamoja region and their services are largely satisfactory. The technical deficits identified require continuous capacity building programs, close supervision and technical backstopping. For sustainability of animal health care services in the region continuous training and strategic deployment of paraprofessionals that are formally recognised by the traditional civil service to gradually replace CAHWs is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5464622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54646222017-06-22 Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda Bugeza, James Kankya, Clovice Muleme, James Akandinda, Ann Sserugga, Joseph Nantima, Noelina Okori, Edward Odoch, Terence PLoS One Research Article AIM: An evaluation exercise was carried out to assess the performance of Community Animal Health Workers (CAHWs) in the delivery of animal health care services in Karamoja region, identify capacity gaps and recommend remedial measures. MATERIALS & METHODS: Participatory methods were used to design data collection tools. Questionnaires were administered to 204 CAHWs, 215 farmers and 7 District Veterinary Officers (DVOs) to collect quantitative data. Seven DVOs and 1 Non Government Organization (NGO) representative were interviewed as key informants and one focus group discussion was conducted with a farmer group in Nakapiripirit to collect qualitative data. Questionnaire data was analyzed using SPSS version 19. Key messages from interviews and the focus group discussion were recorded in a notebook and reported verbatim. RESULTS: 70% of the farmers revealed that CAHWs are the most readily available animal health care service providers in their respective villages. CAHWs were instrumental in treatment of sick animals, disease surveillance, control of external parasites, animal production, vaccination, reporting, animal identification, and performing minor surgeries. Regarding their overall performance 88.8%(191/215) of the farmers said they were impressed. The main challenges faced by the CAHWs were inadequate facilitation, lack of tools and equipments, unwillingness of government to integrate them into the formal extension system, poor information flow, limited technical capacity to diagnose diseases, unwillingness of farmers to pay for services and sustainability issues. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: CAHWs remain the main source of animal health care services in Karamoja region and their services are largely satisfactory. The technical deficits identified require continuous capacity building programs, close supervision and technical backstopping. For sustainability of animal health care services in the region continuous training and strategic deployment of paraprofessionals that are formally recognised by the traditional civil service to gradually replace CAHWs is recommended. Public Library of Science 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5464622/ /pubmed/28594945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179110 Text en © 2017 Bugeza et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bugeza, James
Kankya, Clovice
Muleme, James
Akandinda, Ann
Sserugga, Joseph
Nantima, Noelina
Okori, Edward
Odoch, Terence
Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda
title Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda
title_full Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda
title_fullStr Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda
title_short Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda
title_sort participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in karamoja region of uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179110
work_keys_str_mv AT bugezajames participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda
AT kankyaclovice participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda
AT mulemejames participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda
AT akandindaann participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda
AT sseruggajoseph participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda
AT nantimanoelina participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda
AT okoriedward participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda
AT odochterence participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda