Cargando…
Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda
AIM: An evaluation exercise was carried out to assess the performance of Community Animal Health Workers (CAHWs) in the delivery of animal health care services in Karamoja region, identify capacity gaps and recommend remedial measures. MATERIALS & METHODS: Participatory methods were used to desi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179110 |
_version_ | 1783242808090427392 |
---|---|
author | Bugeza, James Kankya, Clovice Muleme, James Akandinda, Ann Sserugga, Joseph Nantima, Noelina Okori, Edward Odoch, Terence |
author_facet | Bugeza, James Kankya, Clovice Muleme, James Akandinda, Ann Sserugga, Joseph Nantima, Noelina Okori, Edward Odoch, Terence |
author_sort | Bugeza, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: An evaluation exercise was carried out to assess the performance of Community Animal Health Workers (CAHWs) in the delivery of animal health care services in Karamoja region, identify capacity gaps and recommend remedial measures. MATERIALS & METHODS: Participatory methods were used to design data collection tools. Questionnaires were administered to 204 CAHWs, 215 farmers and 7 District Veterinary Officers (DVOs) to collect quantitative data. Seven DVOs and 1 Non Government Organization (NGO) representative were interviewed as key informants and one focus group discussion was conducted with a farmer group in Nakapiripirit to collect qualitative data. Questionnaire data was analyzed using SPSS version 19. Key messages from interviews and the focus group discussion were recorded in a notebook and reported verbatim. RESULTS: 70% of the farmers revealed that CAHWs are the most readily available animal health care service providers in their respective villages. CAHWs were instrumental in treatment of sick animals, disease surveillance, control of external parasites, animal production, vaccination, reporting, animal identification, and performing minor surgeries. Regarding their overall performance 88.8%(191/215) of the farmers said they were impressed. The main challenges faced by the CAHWs were inadequate facilitation, lack of tools and equipments, unwillingness of government to integrate them into the formal extension system, poor information flow, limited technical capacity to diagnose diseases, unwillingness of farmers to pay for services and sustainability issues. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: CAHWs remain the main source of animal health care services in Karamoja region and their services are largely satisfactory. The technical deficits identified require continuous capacity building programs, close supervision and technical backstopping. For sustainability of animal health care services in the region continuous training and strategic deployment of paraprofessionals that are formally recognised by the traditional civil service to gradually replace CAHWs is recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5464622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54646222017-06-22 Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda Bugeza, James Kankya, Clovice Muleme, James Akandinda, Ann Sserugga, Joseph Nantima, Noelina Okori, Edward Odoch, Terence PLoS One Research Article AIM: An evaluation exercise was carried out to assess the performance of Community Animal Health Workers (CAHWs) in the delivery of animal health care services in Karamoja region, identify capacity gaps and recommend remedial measures. MATERIALS & METHODS: Participatory methods were used to design data collection tools. Questionnaires were administered to 204 CAHWs, 215 farmers and 7 District Veterinary Officers (DVOs) to collect quantitative data. Seven DVOs and 1 Non Government Organization (NGO) representative were interviewed as key informants and one focus group discussion was conducted with a farmer group in Nakapiripirit to collect qualitative data. Questionnaire data was analyzed using SPSS version 19. Key messages from interviews and the focus group discussion were recorded in a notebook and reported verbatim. RESULTS: 70% of the farmers revealed that CAHWs are the most readily available animal health care service providers in their respective villages. CAHWs were instrumental in treatment of sick animals, disease surveillance, control of external parasites, animal production, vaccination, reporting, animal identification, and performing minor surgeries. Regarding their overall performance 88.8%(191/215) of the farmers said they were impressed. The main challenges faced by the CAHWs were inadequate facilitation, lack of tools and equipments, unwillingness of government to integrate them into the formal extension system, poor information flow, limited technical capacity to diagnose diseases, unwillingness of farmers to pay for services and sustainability issues. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: CAHWs remain the main source of animal health care services in Karamoja region and their services are largely satisfactory. The technical deficits identified require continuous capacity building programs, close supervision and technical backstopping. For sustainability of animal health care services in the region continuous training and strategic deployment of paraprofessionals that are formally recognised by the traditional civil service to gradually replace CAHWs is recommended. Public Library of Science 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5464622/ /pubmed/28594945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179110 Text en © 2017 Bugeza et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bugeza, James Kankya, Clovice Muleme, James Akandinda, Ann Sserugga, Joseph Nantima, Noelina Okori, Edward Odoch, Terence Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda |
title | Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda |
title_full | Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda |
title_fullStr | Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda |
title_short | Participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in Karamoja region of Uganda |
title_sort | participatory evaluation of delivery of animal health care services by community animal health workers in karamoja region of uganda |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bugezajames participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda AT kankyaclovice participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda AT mulemejames participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda AT akandindaann participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda AT sseruggajoseph participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda AT nantimanoelina participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda AT okoriedward participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda AT odochterence participatoryevaluationofdeliveryofanimalhealthcareservicesbycommunityanimalhealthworkersinkaramojaregionofuganda |