Cargando…

Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) parameters is still controversial in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of maximal standardized up...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Jie, Xie, Guozhu, Liao, Guixiang, Wang, Baiyao, Yan, Miaohong, Li, Hui, Yuan, Yawei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980228
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13934
_version_ 1783242864241672192
author Lin, Jie
Xie, Guozhu
Liao, Guixiang
Wang, Baiyao
Yan, Miaohong
Li, Hui
Yuan, Yawei
author_facet Lin, Jie
Xie, Guozhu
Liao, Guixiang
Wang, Baiyao
Yan, Miaohong
Li, Hui
Yuan, Yawei
author_sort Lin, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) parameters is still controversial in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of maximal standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprising 1,938 patients were included in this study. The combined hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS were 2.63 (95%CI 1.71-4.05) for SUV(max), 2.55 (95%CI 1.49-4.35) for MTV, and 3.32 (95%CI 1.23-8.95) for TLG. The pooled HRs for OS were 2.07 (95%CI 1.54-2.79) for SUV(max), 3.86 (95%CI 1.85-8.06) for MTV, and 2.60 (95%CI 1.55-4.34) for TLG. The prognostic role of SUV(max), MTV and TLG remained similar in the sub-group analyses. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies which associated (18)F-FDG PET/CT to clinical survival outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. The summarized HRs for EFS and OS were estimated by using fixed- or random-effect models according to heterogeneity between trials. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis confirms that high values of SUV(max), MTV and TLG predicted a higher risk of adverse events or death in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, despite clinically heterogeneous nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the various methods adopted between these studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5464920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54649202017-06-21 Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lin, Jie Xie, Guozhu Liao, Guixiang Wang, Baiyao Yan, Miaohong Li, Hui Yuan, Yawei Oncotarget Review BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) parameters is still controversial in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of maximal standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprising 1,938 patients were included in this study. The combined hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS were 2.63 (95%CI 1.71-4.05) for SUV(max), 2.55 (95%CI 1.49-4.35) for MTV, and 3.32 (95%CI 1.23-8.95) for TLG. The pooled HRs for OS were 2.07 (95%CI 1.54-2.79) for SUV(max), 3.86 (95%CI 1.85-8.06) for MTV, and 2.60 (95%CI 1.55-4.34) for TLG. The prognostic role of SUV(max), MTV and TLG remained similar in the sub-group analyses. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies which associated (18)F-FDG PET/CT to clinical survival outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. The summarized HRs for EFS and OS were estimated by using fixed- or random-effect models according to heterogeneity between trials. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis confirms that high values of SUV(max), MTV and TLG predicted a higher risk of adverse events or death in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, despite clinically heterogeneous nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the various methods adopted between these studies. Impact Journals LLC 2016-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5464920/ /pubmed/27980228 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13934 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Lin et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Lin, Jie
Xie, Guozhu
Liao, Guixiang
Wang, Baiyao
Yan, Miaohong
Li, Hui
Yuan, Yawei
Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prognostic value of (18)f-fdg-pet/ct in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5464920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980228
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13934
work_keys_str_mv AT linjie prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xieguozhu prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liaoguixiang prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangbaiyao prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanmiaohong prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihui prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuanyawei prognosticvalueof18ffdgpetctinpatientswithnasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis