Cargando…
The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis
The SEPT9 gene methylation assay is the first FDA-approved blood assay for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), FIT-DNA test and CEA assay are also in vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests used in CRC screening. This meta-analysis aims to review the SEPT9 assay performance and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5465203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28596563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03321-8 |
_version_ | 1783242894878965760 |
---|---|
author | Song, Lele Jia, Jia Peng, Xiumei Xiao, Wenhua Li, Yuemin |
author_facet | Song, Lele Jia, Jia Peng, Xiumei Xiao, Wenhua Li, Yuemin |
author_sort | Song, Lele |
collection | PubMed |
description | The SEPT9 gene methylation assay is the first FDA-approved blood assay for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), FIT-DNA test and CEA assay are also in vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests used in CRC screening. This meta-analysis aims to review the SEPT9 assay performance and compare it with other IVD CRC screening tests. By searching the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBMdisc and CJFD database, 25 out of 180 studies were identified to report the SEPT9 assay performance. 2613 CRC cases and 6030 controls were included, and sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate its performance at various algorithms. 1/3 algorithm exhibited the best sensitivity while 2/3 and 1/1 algorithm exhibited the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. The performance of the blood SEPT9 assay is superior to that of the serum protein markers and the FIT test in symptomatic population, while appeared to be less potent than FIT and FIT-DNA tests in asymptomatic population. In conclusion, 1/3 algorithm is recommended for CRC screening, and 2/3 or 1/1 algorithms are suitable for early detection for diagnostic purpose. The SEPT9 assay exhibited better performance in symptomatic population than in asymptomatic population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5465203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54652032017-06-14 The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis Song, Lele Jia, Jia Peng, Xiumei Xiao, Wenhua Li, Yuemin Sci Rep Article The SEPT9 gene methylation assay is the first FDA-approved blood assay for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), FIT-DNA test and CEA assay are also in vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests used in CRC screening. This meta-analysis aims to review the SEPT9 assay performance and compare it with other IVD CRC screening tests. By searching the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBMdisc and CJFD database, 25 out of 180 studies were identified to report the SEPT9 assay performance. 2613 CRC cases and 6030 controls were included, and sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate its performance at various algorithms. 1/3 algorithm exhibited the best sensitivity while 2/3 and 1/1 algorithm exhibited the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. The performance of the blood SEPT9 assay is superior to that of the serum protein markers and the FIT test in symptomatic population, while appeared to be less potent than FIT and FIT-DNA tests in asymptomatic population. In conclusion, 1/3 algorithm is recommended for CRC screening, and 2/3 or 1/1 algorithms are suitable for early detection for diagnostic purpose. The SEPT9 assay exhibited better performance in symptomatic population than in asymptomatic population. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5465203/ /pubmed/28596563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03321-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Song, Lele Jia, Jia Peng, Xiumei Xiao, Wenhua Li, Yuemin The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis |
title | The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis |
title_full | The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis |
title_short | The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | performance of the sept9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other crc screening tests: a meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5465203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28596563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03321-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songlele theperformanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis AT jiajia theperformanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis AT pengxiumei theperformanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis AT xiaowenhua theperformanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis AT liyuemin theperformanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis AT songlele performanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis AT jiajia performanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis AT pengxiumei performanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis AT xiaowenhua performanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis AT liyuemin performanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis |