Cargando…

The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis

The SEPT9 gene methylation assay is the first FDA-approved blood assay for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), FIT-DNA test and CEA assay are also in vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests used in CRC screening. This meta-analysis aims to review the SEPT9 assay performance and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Lele, Jia, Jia, Peng, Xiumei, Xiao, Wenhua, Li, Yuemin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5465203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28596563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03321-8
_version_ 1783242894878965760
author Song, Lele
Jia, Jia
Peng, Xiumei
Xiao, Wenhua
Li, Yuemin
author_facet Song, Lele
Jia, Jia
Peng, Xiumei
Xiao, Wenhua
Li, Yuemin
author_sort Song, Lele
collection PubMed
description The SEPT9 gene methylation assay is the first FDA-approved blood assay for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), FIT-DNA test and CEA assay are also in vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests used in CRC screening. This meta-analysis aims to review the SEPT9 assay performance and compare it with other IVD CRC screening tests. By searching the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBMdisc and CJFD database, 25 out of 180 studies were identified to report the SEPT9 assay performance. 2613 CRC cases and 6030 controls were included, and sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate its performance at various algorithms. 1/3 algorithm exhibited the best sensitivity while 2/3 and 1/1 algorithm exhibited the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. The performance of the blood SEPT9 assay is superior to that of the serum protein markers and the FIT test in symptomatic population, while appeared to be less potent than FIT and FIT-DNA tests in asymptomatic population. In conclusion, 1/3 algorithm is recommended for CRC screening, and 2/3 or 1/1 algorithms are suitable for early detection for diagnostic purpose. The SEPT9 assay exhibited better performance in symptomatic population than in asymptomatic population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5465203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54652032017-06-14 The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis Song, Lele Jia, Jia Peng, Xiumei Xiao, Wenhua Li, Yuemin Sci Rep Article The SEPT9 gene methylation assay is the first FDA-approved blood assay for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), FIT-DNA test and CEA assay are also in vitro diagnostic (IVD) tests used in CRC screening. This meta-analysis aims to review the SEPT9 assay performance and compare it with other IVD CRC screening tests. By searching the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBMdisc and CJFD database, 25 out of 180 studies were identified to report the SEPT9 assay performance. 2613 CRC cases and 6030 controls were included, and sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate its performance at various algorithms. 1/3 algorithm exhibited the best sensitivity while 2/3 and 1/1 algorithm exhibited the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. The performance of the blood SEPT9 assay is superior to that of the serum protein markers and the FIT test in symptomatic population, while appeared to be less potent than FIT and FIT-DNA tests in asymptomatic population. In conclusion, 1/3 algorithm is recommended for CRC screening, and 2/3 or 1/1 algorithms are suitable for early detection for diagnostic purpose. The SEPT9 assay exhibited better performance in symptomatic population than in asymptomatic population. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5465203/ /pubmed/28596563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03321-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Song, Lele
Jia, Jia
Peng, Xiumei
Xiao, Wenhua
Li, Yuemin
The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis
title The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis
title_full The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis
title_short The performance of the SEPT9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other CRC screening tests: A meta-analysis
title_sort performance of the sept9 gene methylation assay and a comparison with other crc screening tests: a meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5465203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28596563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03321-8
work_keys_str_mv AT songlele theperformanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis
AT jiajia theperformanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis
AT pengxiumei theperformanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis
AT xiaowenhua theperformanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis
AT liyuemin theperformanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis
AT songlele performanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis
AT jiajia performanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis
AT pengxiumei performanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis
AT xiaowenhua performanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis
AT liyuemin performanceofthesept9genemethylationassayandacomparisonwithothercrcscreeningtestsametaanalysis