Cargando…

The Video Head Impulse Test

In 1988, we introduced impulsive testing of semicircular canal (SCC) function measured with scleral search coils and showed that it could accurately and reliably detect impaired function even of a single lateral canal. Later we showed that it was also possible to test individual vertical canal funct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halmagyi, G. M., Chen, Luke, MacDougall, Hamish G., Weber, Konrad P., McGarvie, Leigh A., Curthoys, Ian S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5465266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649224
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00258
_version_ 1783242910075977728
author Halmagyi, G. M.
Chen, Luke
MacDougall, Hamish G.
Weber, Konrad P.
McGarvie, Leigh A.
Curthoys, Ian S.
author_facet Halmagyi, G. M.
Chen, Luke
MacDougall, Hamish G.
Weber, Konrad P.
McGarvie, Leigh A.
Curthoys, Ian S.
author_sort Halmagyi, G. M.
collection PubMed
description In 1988, we introduced impulsive testing of semicircular canal (SCC) function measured with scleral search coils and showed that it could accurately and reliably detect impaired function even of a single lateral canal. Later we showed that it was also possible to test individual vertical canal function in peripheral and also in central vestibular disorders and proposed a physiological mechanism for why this might be so. For the next 20 years, between 1988 and 2008, impulsive testing of individual SCC function could only be accurately done by a few aficionados with the time and money to support scleral search-coil systems—an expensive, complicated and cumbersome, semi-invasive technique that never made the transition from the research lab to the dizzy clinic. Then, in 2009 and 2013, we introduced a video method of testing function of each of the six canals individually. Since 2009, the method has been taken up by most dizzy clinics around the world, with now close to 100 refereed articles in PubMed. In many dizzy clinics around the world, video Head Impulse Testing has supplanted caloric testing as the initial and in some cases the final test of choice in patients with suspected vestibular disorders. Here, we consider seven current, interesting, and controversial aspects of video Head Impulse Testing: (1) introduction to the test; (2) the progress from the head impulse protocol (HIMPs) to the new variant—suppression head impulse protocol (SHIMPs); (3) the physiological basis for head impulse testing; (4) practical aspects and potential pitfalls of video head impulse testing; (5) problems of vestibulo-ocular reflex gain calculations; (6) head impulse testing in central vestibular disorders; and (7) to stay right up-to-date—new clinical disease patterns emerging from video head impulse testing. With thanks and appreciation we dedicate this article to our friend, colleague, and mentor, Dr Bernard Cohen of Mount Sinai Medical School, New York, who since his first article 55 years ago on compensatory eye movements induced by vertical SCC stimulation has become one of the giants of the vestibular world.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5465266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54652662017-06-23 The Video Head Impulse Test Halmagyi, G. M. Chen, Luke MacDougall, Hamish G. Weber, Konrad P. McGarvie, Leigh A. Curthoys, Ian S. Front Neurol Neuroscience In 1988, we introduced impulsive testing of semicircular canal (SCC) function measured with scleral search coils and showed that it could accurately and reliably detect impaired function even of a single lateral canal. Later we showed that it was also possible to test individual vertical canal function in peripheral and also in central vestibular disorders and proposed a physiological mechanism for why this might be so. For the next 20 years, between 1988 and 2008, impulsive testing of individual SCC function could only be accurately done by a few aficionados with the time and money to support scleral search-coil systems—an expensive, complicated and cumbersome, semi-invasive technique that never made the transition from the research lab to the dizzy clinic. Then, in 2009 and 2013, we introduced a video method of testing function of each of the six canals individually. Since 2009, the method has been taken up by most dizzy clinics around the world, with now close to 100 refereed articles in PubMed. In many dizzy clinics around the world, video Head Impulse Testing has supplanted caloric testing as the initial and in some cases the final test of choice in patients with suspected vestibular disorders. Here, we consider seven current, interesting, and controversial aspects of video Head Impulse Testing: (1) introduction to the test; (2) the progress from the head impulse protocol (HIMPs) to the new variant—suppression head impulse protocol (SHIMPs); (3) the physiological basis for head impulse testing; (4) practical aspects and potential pitfalls of video head impulse testing; (5) problems of vestibulo-ocular reflex gain calculations; (6) head impulse testing in central vestibular disorders; and (7) to stay right up-to-date—new clinical disease patterns emerging from video head impulse testing. With thanks and appreciation we dedicate this article to our friend, colleague, and mentor, Dr Bernard Cohen of Mount Sinai Medical School, New York, who since his first article 55 years ago on compensatory eye movements induced by vertical SCC stimulation has become one of the giants of the vestibular world. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5465266/ /pubmed/28649224 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00258 Text en Copyright © 2017 Halmagyi, Chen, MacDougall, Weber, McGarvie and Curthoys. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Halmagyi, G. M.
Chen, Luke
MacDougall, Hamish G.
Weber, Konrad P.
McGarvie, Leigh A.
Curthoys, Ian S.
The Video Head Impulse Test
title The Video Head Impulse Test
title_full The Video Head Impulse Test
title_fullStr The Video Head Impulse Test
title_full_unstemmed The Video Head Impulse Test
title_short The Video Head Impulse Test
title_sort video head impulse test
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5465266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649224
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00258
work_keys_str_mv AT halmagyigm thevideoheadimpulsetest
AT chenluke thevideoheadimpulsetest
AT macdougallhamishg thevideoheadimpulsetest
AT weberkonradp thevideoheadimpulsetest
AT mcgarvieleigha thevideoheadimpulsetest
AT curthoysians thevideoheadimpulsetest
AT halmagyigm videoheadimpulsetest
AT chenluke videoheadimpulsetest
AT macdougallhamishg videoheadimpulsetest
AT weberkonradp videoheadimpulsetest
AT mcgarvieleigha videoheadimpulsetest
AT curthoysians videoheadimpulsetest