Cargando…
A comparison of approaches for adjudicating outcomes in clinical trials
BACKGROUND: Incorrect classification of outcomes in clinical trials can lead to biased estimates of treatment effect and reduced power. Ensuring appropriate adjudication methods to minimize outcome misclassification is therefore essential. While there are many reported adjudication approaches, there...
Autores principales: | Kahan, Brennan C., Feagan, Brian, Jairath, Vipul |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5465459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28595589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1995-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Outcome pre-specification requires sufficient detail to guard against outcome switching in clinical trials: a case study
por: Kahan, Brennan C., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies
por: Kahan, Brennan C, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Can we reduce bias in open-label trials when blinded outcome assessment is not possible? An example from the trigger trial
por: Kahan, Brennan, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Exploring non-compliance in a cluster randomised feasibility study to inform the design of the phase III trial
por: Bell, Lauren, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Update on the transfusion in gastrointestinal bleeding (TRIGGER) trial: statistical analysis plan for a cluster-randomised feasibility trial
por: Kahan, Brennan C, et al.
Publicado: (2013)