Cargando…
Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers
BACKGROUND: Effective interdisciplinary communication is important to achieve better quality in health care. The aims of this study were to compare conventional and complementary providers’ experience of communication about complementary therapies and conventional medicine with their cancer patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5465600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28595577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1814-0 |
_version_ | 1783242976265240576 |
---|---|
author | Stub, Trine Quandt, Sara A. Arcury, Thomas A. Sandberg, Joanne C. Kristoffersen, Agnete E. |
author_facet | Stub, Trine Quandt, Sara A. Arcury, Thomas A. Sandberg, Joanne C. Kristoffersen, Agnete E. |
author_sort | Stub, Trine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Effective interdisciplinary communication is important to achieve better quality in health care. The aims of this study were to compare conventional and complementary providers’ experience of communication about complementary therapies and conventional medicine with their cancer patients, and to investigate how they experience interdisciplinary communication and cooperation. METHOD: This study analyzed data from a self-administrated questionnaire. A total of 606 different health care providers, from four counties in Norway, completed the questionnaire. The survey was developed to describe aspects of the communication pattern among oncology doctors, nurses, family physicians and complementary therapists (acupuncturists, massage therapists and reflexologists/zone-therapists). Between-group differences were analyzed using chi-square, ANOVA and Fisher’s exact tests. Significance level was defined as p < 0.05 without adjustment for multiple comparisons. RESULT: Conventional providers and complementary therapists had different patterns of communication with their cancer patients regarding complementary therapies. While complementary therapists advised their patients to apply both complementary and conventional modalities, medical doctors were less supportive of their patients’ use of complementary therapies. Of conventional providers, nurses expressed more positive attitudes toward complementary therapies. Opportunities to improve communication between conventional and complementary providers were most strongly supported by complementary providers and nurses; medical doctors were less supportive of such attempts. A number of doctors showed lack of respect for complementary therapists, but asked for more research, guidelines for complementary modalities and training in conventional medicine for complementary therapists. CONCLUSION: For better quality of care, greater communication about complementary therapy use is needed between cancer patients and their conventional and complementary providers. In addition, more communication between conventional and complementary providers is needed. Nurses may have a crucial role in facilitating communication, as they are positive toward complementary therapies and they have more direct communication with patients about their treatment preferences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5465600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54656002017-06-09 Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers Stub, Trine Quandt, Sara A. Arcury, Thomas A. Sandberg, Joanne C. Kristoffersen, Agnete E. BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Effective interdisciplinary communication is important to achieve better quality in health care. The aims of this study were to compare conventional and complementary providers’ experience of communication about complementary therapies and conventional medicine with their cancer patients, and to investigate how they experience interdisciplinary communication and cooperation. METHOD: This study analyzed data from a self-administrated questionnaire. A total of 606 different health care providers, from four counties in Norway, completed the questionnaire. The survey was developed to describe aspects of the communication pattern among oncology doctors, nurses, family physicians and complementary therapists (acupuncturists, massage therapists and reflexologists/zone-therapists). Between-group differences were analyzed using chi-square, ANOVA and Fisher’s exact tests. Significance level was defined as p < 0.05 without adjustment for multiple comparisons. RESULT: Conventional providers and complementary therapists had different patterns of communication with their cancer patients regarding complementary therapies. While complementary therapists advised their patients to apply both complementary and conventional modalities, medical doctors were less supportive of their patients’ use of complementary therapies. Of conventional providers, nurses expressed more positive attitudes toward complementary therapies. Opportunities to improve communication between conventional and complementary providers were most strongly supported by complementary providers and nurses; medical doctors were less supportive of such attempts. A number of doctors showed lack of respect for complementary therapists, but asked for more research, guidelines for complementary modalities and training in conventional medicine for complementary therapists. CONCLUSION: For better quality of care, greater communication about complementary therapy use is needed between cancer patients and their conventional and complementary providers. In addition, more communication between conventional and complementary providers is needed. Nurses may have a crucial role in facilitating communication, as they are positive toward complementary therapies and they have more direct communication with patients about their treatment preferences. BioMed Central 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5465600/ /pubmed/28595577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1814-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stub, Trine Quandt, Sara A. Arcury, Thomas A. Sandberg, Joanne C. Kristoffersen, Agnete E. Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers |
title | Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers |
title_full | Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers |
title_fullStr | Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers |
title_full_unstemmed | Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers |
title_short | Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers |
title_sort | complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5465600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28595577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1814-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stubtrine complementaryandconventionalprovidersincancercareexperienceofcommunicationwithpatientsandstepstoimprovecommunicationwithotherproviders AT quandtsaraa complementaryandconventionalprovidersincancercareexperienceofcommunicationwithpatientsandstepstoimprovecommunicationwithotherproviders AT arcurythomasa complementaryandconventionalprovidersincancercareexperienceofcommunicationwithpatientsandstepstoimprovecommunicationwithotherproviders AT sandbergjoannec complementaryandconventionalprovidersincancercareexperienceofcommunicationwithpatientsandstepstoimprovecommunicationwithotherproviders AT kristoffersenagnetee complementaryandconventionalprovidersincancercareexperienceofcommunicationwithpatientsandstepstoimprovecommunicationwithotherproviders |