Cargando…

Predicting Ideological Prejudice

A major shortcoming of current models of ideological prejudice is that although they can anticipate the direction of the association between participants’ ideology and their prejudice against a range of target groups, they cannot predict the size of this association. I developed and tested models th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brandt, Mark J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28394693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797617693004
_version_ 1783243042251079680
author Brandt, Mark J.
author_facet Brandt, Mark J.
author_sort Brandt, Mark J.
collection PubMed
description A major shortcoming of current models of ideological prejudice is that although they can anticipate the direction of the association between participants’ ideology and their prejudice against a range of target groups, they cannot predict the size of this association. I developed and tested models that can make specific size predictions for this association. A quantitative model that used the perceived ideology of the target group as the primary predictor of the ideology-prejudice relationship was developed with a representative sample of Americans (N = 4,940) and tested against models using the perceived status of and choice to belong to the target group as predictors. In four studies (total N = 2,093), ideology-prejudice associations were estimated, and these observed estimates were compared with the models’ predictions. The model that was based only on perceived ideology was the most parsimonious with the smallest errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5466142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54661422017-06-15 Predicting Ideological Prejudice Brandt, Mark J. Psychol Sci Research Articles A major shortcoming of current models of ideological prejudice is that although they can anticipate the direction of the association between participants’ ideology and their prejudice against a range of target groups, they cannot predict the size of this association. I developed and tested models that can make specific size predictions for this association. A quantitative model that used the perceived ideology of the target group as the primary predictor of the ideology-prejudice relationship was developed with a representative sample of Americans (N = 4,940) and tested against models using the perceived status of and choice to belong to the target group as predictors. In four studies (total N = 2,093), ideology-prejudice associations were estimated, and these observed estimates were compared with the models’ predictions. The model that was based only on perceived ideology was the most parsimonious with the smallest errors. SAGE Publications 2017-04-10 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5466142/ /pubmed/28394693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797617693004 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Brandt, Mark J.
Predicting Ideological Prejudice
title Predicting Ideological Prejudice
title_full Predicting Ideological Prejudice
title_fullStr Predicting Ideological Prejudice
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Ideological Prejudice
title_short Predicting Ideological Prejudice
title_sort predicting ideological prejudice
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28394693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797617693004
work_keys_str_mv AT brandtmarkj predictingideologicalprejudice