Cargando…
An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability
PURPOSE: To develop a tool to evaluate myofascial adhesions objectively in patients with breast cancer and to investigate its interrater reliability. METHODS: 1) Development of the evaluation tool. Literature was searched, experts in the field of myofascial therapy were consulted and pilot testing w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28598978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179116 |
_version_ | 1783243074244182016 |
---|---|
author | De Groef, An Van Kampen, Marijke Vervloesem, Nele De Geyter, Sophie Dieltjens, Evi Christiaens, Marie-Rose Neven, Patrick Geraerts, Inge Devoogdt, Nele |
author_facet | De Groef, An Van Kampen, Marijke Vervloesem, Nele De Geyter, Sophie Dieltjens, Evi Christiaens, Marie-Rose Neven, Patrick Geraerts, Inge Devoogdt, Nele |
author_sort | De Groef, An |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop a tool to evaluate myofascial adhesions objectively in patients with breast cancer and to investigate its interrater reliability. METHODS: 1) Development of the evaluation tool. Literature was searched, experts in the field of myofascial therapy were consulted and pilot testing was performed. 2) Thirty patients (63% had a mastectomy, 37% breast-conserving surgery and 97% radiotherapy) with myofascial adhesions were evaluated using the developed tool by 2 independent raters. The Weighted Kappa (WK) and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. RESULTS: 1) The evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients with Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool) consisted of the assessment of myofascial adhesions at 7 locations: axillary and breast region scars, musculi pectorales region, axilla, frontal chest wall, lateral chest wall and the inframammary fold. At each location the degree of the myofascial adhesion was scored at three levels (skin, superficial and deep) on a 4-points scale (between no adhesions and very stiff adhesions). Additionally, a total score (0–9) was calculated, i.e. the sum of the different levels of each location. 2) Interrater agreement of the different levels separately was moderate for the axillary and mastectomy scar (WK 0.62–0.73) and good for the scar on the breast (WK >0.75). Moderate agreement was reached for almost all levels of the non-scar locations. Interrater reliability of the total scores was the highest for the scars (ICC 0.82–0.99). At non-scar locations good interrater reliability was reached, except for the inframammary fold (ICC = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The total scores of all locations of the MAP-BC evaluation tool had good to excellent interrater reliability, except for the inframammary fold which only reached moderate reliability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5466317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54663172017-06-22 An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability De Groef, An Van Kampen, Marijke Vervloesem, Nele De Geyter, Sophie Dieltjens, Evi Christiaens, Marie-Rose Neven, Patrick Geraerts, Inge Devoogdt, Nele PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To develop a tool to evaluate myofascial adhesions objectively in patients with breast cancer and to investigate its interrater reliability. METHODS: 1) Development of the evaluation tool. Literature was searched, experts in the field of myofascial therapy were consulted and pilot testing was performed. 2) Thirty patients (63% had a mastectomy, 37% breast-conserving surgery and 97% radiotherapy) with myofascial adhesions were evaluated using the developed tool by 2 independent raters. The Weighted Kappa (WK) and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. RESULTS: 1) The evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients with Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool) consisted of the assessment of myofascial adhesions at 7 locations: axillary and breast region scars, musculi pectorales region, axilla, frontal chest wall, lateral chest wall and the inframammary fold. At each location the degree of the myofascial adhesion was scored at three levels (skin, superficial and deep) on a 4-points scale (between no adhesions and very stiff adhesions). Additionally, a total score (0–9) was calculated, i.e. the sum of the different levels of each location. 2) Interrater agreement of the different levels separately was moderate for the axillary and mastectomy scar (WK 0.62–0.73) and good for the scar on the breast (WK >0.75). Moderate agreement was reached for almost all levels of the non-scar locations. Interrater reliability of the total scores was the highest for the scars (ICC 0.82–0.99). At non-scar locations good interrater reliability was reached, except for the inframammary fold (ICC = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The total scores of all locations of the MAP-BC evaluation tool had good to excellent interrater reliability, except for the inframammary fold which only reached moderate reliability. Public Library of Science 2017-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5466317/ /pubmed/28598978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179116 Text en © 2017 De Groef et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article De Groef, An Van Kampen, Marijke Vervloesem, Nele De Geyter, Sophie Dieltjens, Evi Christiaens, Marie-Rose Neven, Patrick Geraerts, Inge Devoogdt, Nele An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability |
title | An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability |
title_full | An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability |
title_fullStr | An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability |
title_short | An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability |
title_sort | evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (map-bc evaluation tool): development and interrater reliability |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28598978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179116 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degroefan anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT vankampenmarijke anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT vervloesemnele anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT degeytersophie anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT dieltjensevi anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT christiaensmarierose anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT nevenpatrick anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT geraertsinge anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT devoogdtnele anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT degroefan evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT vankampenmarijke evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT vervloesemnele evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT degeytersophie evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT dieltjensevi evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT christiaensmarierose evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT nevenpatrick evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT geraertsinge evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability AT devoogdtnele evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtooldevelopmentandinterraterreliability |