Cargando…

The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk

Understanding the gene-specific risks for development of breast cancer will lead to improved clinical care for those carrying germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes. We sought to detail the spectrum of mutations and refine risk estimates for known and proposed breast cancer susceptibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slavin, Thomas P., Maxwell, Kara N., Lilyquist, Jenna, Vijai, Joseph, Neuhausen, Susan L., Hart, Steven N., Ravichandran, Vignesh, Thomas, Tinu, Maria, Ann, Villano, Danylo, Schrader, Kasmintan A., Moore, Raymond, Hu, Chunling, Wubbenhorst, Bradley, Wenz, Brandon M., D’Andrea, Kurt, Robson, Mark E., Peterlongo, Paolo, Bonanni, Bernardo, Ford, James M., Garber, Judy E., Domchek, Susan M., Szabo, Csilla, Offit, Kenneth, Nathanson, Katherine L., Weitzel, Jeffrey N., Couch, Fergus J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0024-8
_version_ 1783243118587412480
author Slavin, Thomas P.
Maxwell, Kara N.
Lilyquist, Jenna
Vijai, Joseph
Neuhausen, Susan L.
Hart, Steven N.
Ravichandran, Vignesh
Thomas, Tinu
Maria, Ann
Villano, Danylo
Schrader, Kasmintan A.
Moore, Raymond
Hu, Chunling
Wubbenhorst, Bradley
Wenz, Brandon M.
D’Andrea, Kurt
Robson, Mark E.
Peterlongo, Paolo
Bonanni, Bernardo
Ford, James M.
Garber, Judy E.
Domchek, Susan M.
Szabo, Csilla
Offit, Kenneth
Nathanson, Katherine L.
Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
Couch, Fergus J.
author_facet Slavin, Thomas P.
Maxwell, Kara N.
Lilyquist, Jenna
Vijai, Joseph
Neuhausen, Susan L.
Hart, Steven N.
Ravichandran, Vignesh
Thomas, Tinu
Maria, Ann
Villano, Danylo
Schrader, Kasmintan A.
Moore, Raymond
Hu, Chunling
Wubbenhorst, Bradley
Wenz, Brandon M.
D’Andrea, Kurt
Robson, Mark E.
Peterlongo, Paolo
Bonanni, Bernardo
Ford, James M.
Garber, Judy E.
Domchek, Susan M.
Szabo, Csilla
Offit, Kenneth
Nathanson, Katherine L.
Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
Couch, Fergus J.
author_sort Slavin, Thomas P.
collection PubMed
description Understanding the gene-specific risks for development of breast cancer will lead to improved clinical care for those carrying germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes. We sought to detail the spectrum of mutations and refine risk estimates for known and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes. Targeted massively-parallel sequencing was performed to identify mutations and copy number variants in 26 known or proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes in 2134 BRCA1/2-negative women with familial breast cancer (proband with breast cancer and a family history of breast or ovarian cancer) from a largely European–Caucasian multi-institutional cohort. Case–control analysis was performed comparing the frequency of internally classified mutations identified in familial breast cancer women to Exome Aggregation Consortium controls. Mutations were identified in 8.2% of familial breast cancer women, including mutations in high-risk (odds ratio > 5) (1.4%) and moderate-risk genes (2 < odds ratio < 5) (2.9%). The remaining familial breast cancer women had mutations in proposed breast cancer genes (1.7%), Lynch syndrome genes (0.5%), and six cases had two mutations (0.3%). Case–control analysis demonstrated associations with familial breast cancer for ATM, PALB2, and TP53 mutations (odds ratio > 3.0, p < 10(−4)), BARD1 mutations (odds ratio = 3.2, p = 0.012), and CHEK2 truncating mutations (odds ratio = 1.6, p = 0.041). Our results demonstrate that approximately 4.7% of BRCA1/2 negative familial breast cancer women have mutations in genes statistically associated with breast cancer. We classified PALB2 and TP53 as high-risk, ATM and BARD1 as moderate risk, and CHEK2 truncating mutations as low risk breast cancer predisposition genes. This study demonstrates that large case–control studies are needed to fully evaluate the breast cancer risks associated with mutations in moderate-risk and proposed susceptibility genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5466608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54666082017-06-23 The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk Slavin, Thomas P. Maxwell, Kara N. Lilyquist, Jenna Vijai, Joseph Neuhausen, Susan L. Hart, Steven N. Ravichandran, Vignesh Thomas, Tinu Maria, Ann Villano, Danylo Schrader, Kasmintan A. Moore, Raymond Hu, Chunling Wubbenhorst, Bradley Wenz, Brandon M. D’Andrea, Kurt Robson, Mark E. Peterlongo, Paolo Bonanni, Bernardo Ford, James M. Garber, Judy E. Domchek, Susan M. Szabo, Csilla Offit, Kenneth Nathanson, Katherine L. Weitzel, Jeffrey N. Couch, Fergus J. NPJ Breast Cancer Article Understanding the gene-specific risks for development of breast cancer will lead to improved clinical care for those carrying germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes. We sought to detail the spectrum of mutations and refine risk estimates for known and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes. Targeted massively-parallel sequencing was performed to identify mutations and copy number variants in 26 known or proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes in 2134 BRCA1/2-negative women with familial breast cancer (proband with breast cancer and a family history of breast or ovarian cancer) from a largely European–Caucasian multi-institutional cohort. Case–control analysis was performed comparing the frequency of internally classified mutations identified in familial breast cancer women to Exome Aggregation Consortium controls. Mutations were identified in 8.2% of familial breast cancer women, including mutations in high-risk (odds ratio > 5) (1.4%) and moderate-risk genes (2 < odds ratio < 5) (2.9%). The remaining familial breast cancer women had mutations in proposed breast cancer genes (1.7%), Lynch syndrome genes (0.5%), and six cases had two mutations (0.3%). Case–control analysis demonstrated associations with familial breast cancer for ATM, PALB2, and TP53 mutations (odds ratio > 3.0, p < 10(−4)), BARD1 mutations (odds ratio = 3.2, p = 0.012), and CHEK2 truncating mutations (odds ratio = 1.6, p = 0.041). Our results demonstrate that approximately 4.7% of BRCA1/2 negative familial breast cancer women have mutations in genes statistically associated with breast cancer. We classified PALB2 and TP53 as high-risk, ATM and BARD1 as moderate risk, and CHEK2 truncating mutations as low risk breast cancer predisposition genes. This study demonstrates that large case–control studies are needed to fully evaluate the breast cancer risks associated with mutations in moderate-risk and proposed susceptibility genes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5466608/ /pubmed/28649662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0024-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Slavin, Thomas P.
Maxwell, Kara N.
Lilyquist, Jenna
Vijai, Joseph
Neuhausen, Susan L.
Hart, Steven N.
Ravichandran, Vignesh
Thomas, Tinu
Maria, Ann
Villano, Danylo
Schrader, Kasmintan A.
Moore, Raymond
Hu, Chunling
Wubbenhorst, Bradley
Wenz, Brandon M.
D’Andrea, Kurt
Robson, Mark E.
Peterlongo, Paolo
Bonanni, Bernardo
Ford, James M.
Garber, Judy E.
Domchek, Susan M.
Szabo, Csilla
Offit, Kenneth
Nathanson, Katherine L.
Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
Couch, Fergus J.
The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk
title The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk
title_full The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk
title_fullStr The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk
title_short The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk
title_sort contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-017-0024-8
work_keys_str_mv AT slavinthomasp thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT maxwellkaran thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT lilyquistjenna thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT vijaijoseph thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT neuhausensusanl thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT hartstevenn thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT ravichandranvignesh thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT thomastinu thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT mariaann thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT villanodanylo thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT schraderkasmintana thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT mooreraymond thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT huchunling thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT wubbenhorstbradley thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT wenzbrandonm thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT dandreakurt thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT robsonmarke thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT peterlongopaolo thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT bonannibernardo thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT fordjamesm thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT garberjudye thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT domcheksusanm thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT szabocsilla thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT offitkenneth thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT nathansonkatherinel thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT weitzeljeffreyn thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT couchfergusj thecontributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT slavinthomasp contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT maxwellkaran contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT lilyquistjenna contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT vijaijoseph contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT neuhausensusanl contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT hartstevenn contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT ravichandranvignesh contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT thomastinu contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT mariaann contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT villanodanylo contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT schraderkasmintana contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT mooreraymond contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT huchunling contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT wubbenhorstbradley contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT wenzbrandonm contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT dandreakurt contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT robsonmarke contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT peterlongopaolo contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT bonannibernardo contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT fordjamesm contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT garberjudye contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT domcheksusanm contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT szabocsilla contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT offitkenneth contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT nathansonkatherinel contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT weitzeljeffreyn contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk
AT couchfergusj contributionofpathogenicvariantsinbreastcancersusceptibilitygenestofamilialbreastcancerrisk