Cargando…

Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a multi factorial disease, affecting clinical outcomes in failing heart patients treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-d). METHODS: One hundred and ninety-five T2DM patients received a CRT-d treatment. Randomly the study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sardu, Celestino, Barbieri, Michelangela, Santamaria, Matteo, Giordano, Valerio, Sacra, Cosimo, Paolisso, Pasquale, Spirito, Alessandro, Marfella, Raffaele, Paolisso, Giuseppe, Rizzo, Maria Rosaria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28599667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0554-2
_version_ 1783243159828955136
author Sardu, Celestino
Barbieri, Michelangela
Santamaria, Matteo
Giordano, Valerio
Sacra, Cosimo
Paolisso, Pasquale
Spirito, Alessandro
Marfella, Raffaele
Paolisso, Giuseppe
Rizzo, Maria Rosaria
author_facet Sardu, Celestino
Barbieri, Michelangela
Santamaria, Matteo
Giordano, Valerio
Sacra, Cosimo
Paolisso, Pasquale
Spirito, Alessandro
Marfella, Raffaele
Paolisso, Giuseppe
Rizzo, Maria Rosaria
author_sort Sardu, Celestino
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a multi factorial disease, affecting clinical outcomes in failing heart patients treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-d). METHODS: One hundred and ninety-five T2DM patients received a CRT-d treatment. Randomly the study population received a CRT-d via multipolar left ventricle (LV) lead pacing (n 99, multipolar group), vs a CRT-d via bipolar LV pacing (n 96, bipolar group). These patients were followed by clinical, and instrumental assessment, and telemetric device control at follow up. In this study we evaluated, in a population of failing heart T2DM patients, cardiac deaths, all cause deaths, arrhythmic events, CRT-d responders rate, hospitalizations for HF worsening, phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), and LV catheter dislodgment events (and re-intervention for LV catheter re-positioning), comparing multipolar CRT-d vs bipolar CRT-d group of patients at follow up. RESULTS: At follow up there was a statistical significant difference about atrial arrhythmic events [7 (7%) vs 16 (16.7%), p value 0.019], hospitalizations for HF worsening [15 (15.2% vs 24 (25%), p value 0.046], LV catheter dislodgments [1 (1%) vs 9 (9.4%), p value 0018], PNS [5 (5%) vs 18 (18.7%), p value 0.007], and LV re-positioning [1 (1%) vs 9 (9.4%), p value 0.018], comparing multipolar CRT-d vs bipolar CRT-d group of patients. Multipolar pacing was an independent predictor of all these events. CONCLUSIONS: CRT-d pacing via multipolar LV lead vs bipolar LV lead may reduce arrhythmic burden, hospitalization rate, PNS, LV catheters dislodgments, and re-interventions in T2DM failing heart patients. Clinical trial number NCT03095196
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5466779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54667792017-06-14 Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes Sardu, Celestino Barbieri, Michelangela Santamaria, Matteo Giordano, Valerio Sacra, Cosimo Paolisso, Pasquale Spirito, Alessandro Marfella, Raffaele Paolisso, Giuseppe Rizzo, Maria Rosaria Cardiovasc Diabetol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a multi factorial disease, affecting clinical outcomes in failing heart patients treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-d). METHODS: One hundred and ninety-five T2DM patients received a CRT-d treatment. Randomly the study population received a CRT-d via multipolar left ventricle (LV) lead pacing (n 99, multipolar group), vs a CRT-d via bipolar LV pacing (n 96, bipolar group). These patients were followed by clinical, and instrumental assessment, and telemetric device control at follow up. In this study we evaluated, in a population of failing heart T2DM patients, cardiac deaths, all cause deaths, arrhythmic events, CRT-d responders rate, hospitalizations for HF worsening, phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), and LV catheter dislodgment events (and re-intervention for LV catheter re-positioning), comparing multipolar CRT-d vs bipolar CRT-d group of patients at follow up. RESULTS: At follow up there was a statistical significant difference about atrial arrhythmic events [7 (7%) vs 16 (16.7%), p value 0.019], hospitalizations for HF worsening [15 (15.2% vs 24 (25%), p value 0.046], LV catheter dislodgments [1 (1%) vs 9 (9.4%), p value 0018], PNS [5 (5%) vs 18 (18.7%), p value 0.007], and LV re-positioning [1 (1%) vs 9 (9.4%), p value 0.018], comparing multipolar CRT-d vs bipolar CRT-d group of patients. Multipolar pacing was an independent predictor of all these events. CONCLUSIONS: CRT-d pacing via multipolar LV lead vs bipolar LV lead may reduce arrhythmic burden, hospitalization rate, PNS, LV catheters dislodgments, and re-interventions in T2DM failing heart patients. Clinical trial number NCT03095196 BioMed Central 2017-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5466779/ /pubmed/28599667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0554-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Sardu, Celestino
Barbieri, Michelangela
Santamaria, Matteo
Giordano, Valerio
Sacra, Cosimo
Paolisso, Pasquale
Spirito, Alessandro
Marfella, Raffaele
Paolisso, Giuseppe
Rizzo, Maria Rosaria
Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes
title Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes
title_full Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes
title_fullStr Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes
title_short Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes
title_sort multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5466779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28599667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-017-0554-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sarducelestino multipolarpacingbycardiacresynchronizationtherapywithadefibrillatorstreatmentintype2diabetesmellitusfailingheartpatientsimpactonrespondersrateandclinicaloutcomes
AT barbierimichelangela multipolarpacingbycardiacresynchronizationtherapywithadefibrillatorstreatmentintype2diabetesmellitusfailingheartpatientsimpactonrespondersrateandclinicaloutcomes
AT santamariamatteo multipolarpacingbycardiacresynchronizationtherapywithadefibrillatorstreatmentintype2diabetesmellitusfailingheartpatientsimpactonrespondersrateandclinicaloutcomes
AT giordanovalerio multipolarpacingbycardiacresynchronizationtherapywithadefibrillatorstreatmentintype2diabetesmellitusfailingheartpatientsimpactonrespondersrateandclinicaloutcomes
AT sacracosimo multipolarpacingbycardiacresynchronizationtherapywithadefibrillatorstreatmentintype2diabetesmellitusfailingheartpatientsimpactonrespondersrateandclinicaloutcomes
AT paolissopasquale multipolarpacingbycardiacresynchronizationtherapywithadefibrillatorstreatmentintype2diabetesmellitusfailingheartpatientsimpactonrespondersrateandclinicaloutcomes
AT spiritoalessandro multipolarpacingbycardiacresynchronizationtherapywithadefibrillatorstreatmentintype2diabetesmellitusfailingheartpatientsimpactonrespondersrateandclinicaloutcomes
AT marfellaraffaele multipolarpacingbycardiacresynchronizationtherapywithadefibrillatorstreatmentintype2diabetesmellitusfailingheartpatientsimpactonrespondersrateandclinicaloutcomes
AT paolissogiuseppe multipolarpacingbycardiacresynchronizationtherapywithadefibrillatorstreatmentintype2diabetesmellitusfailingheartpatientsimpactonrespondersrateandclinicaloutcomes
AT rizzomariarosaria multipolarpacingbycardiacresynchronizationtherapywithadefibrillatorstreatmentintype2diabetesmellitusfailingheartpatientsimpactonrespondersrateandclinicaloutcomes