Cargando…

Awareness and perceived fairness of option B+ in Malawi: a population-level perspective

Introduction: Policies for rationing antiretroviral therapy (ART) have been subject to on-going ethical debates. Introduced in Malawi in 2011, Option B+ prioritized HIV-positive pregnant women for lifelong ART regardless of the underlying state of their immune system, shifting the logic of allocatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeatman, Sara, Trinitapoli, Jenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5467611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28362070
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21467
_version_ 1783243297826799616
author Yeatman, Sara
Trinitapoli, Jenny
author_facet Yeatman, Sara
Trinitapoli, Jenny
author_sort Yeatman, Sara
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Policies for rationing antiretroviral therapy (ART) have been subject to on-going ethical debates. Introduced in Malawi in 2011, Option B+ prioritized HIV-positive pregnant women for lifelong ART regardless of the underlying state of their immune system, shifting the logic of allocation away from medical eligibility. Despite the rapid expansion of this policy, we know little about how it has been understood and interpreted by the people it affects. Methods: We assessed awareness and perceived fairness of the prioritization system for ART among a population-based sample of young women (n = 1440) and their partners (n = 574) in southern Malawi. We use a card-sort technique to elicit understandings of who gets ART under Option B+ and who should be prioritized, and we compare perceptions to actual ART policy using sequence analysis and optimal matching. We then use ordered logistic regression to identify the factors associated with policy awareness. Results: In 2015, only 30.7% of women and 21.1% of male partners understood how ART was being distributed. There was widespread confusion around whether otherwise healthy HIV-positive pregnant women could access ART under Option B + . Nonetheless, more young adults thought that the fairest policy should prioritize such women than believed the actual policy did. Women who were older, more educated or had recently engaged with the health system through antenatal care or ART had more accurate understandings of Option B + . Among men, policy awareness was lower, and was patterned only by education. Conclusions: Although most respondents were unaware that Option B+ afforded ART access to healthy-pregnant women, Malawians support the prioritization of pregnant women. Countries adopting Option B+ or other new ART policies such as universal test-and-treat should communicate the policies and their rationales to the public – such transparency would be more consistent with a fair and ethical process and could additionally serve to clarify confusion and enhance retention.​​
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5467611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54676112017-06-19 Awareness and perceived fairness of option B+ in Malawi: a population-level perspective Yeatman, Sara Trinitapoli, Jenny J Int AIDS Soc Research Article Introduction: Policies for rationing antiretroviral therapy (ART) have been subject to on-going ethical debates. Introduced in Malawi in 2011, Option B+ prioritized HIV-positive pregnant women for lifelong ART regardless of the underlying state of their immune system, shifting the logic of allocation away from medical eligibility. Despite the rapid expansion of this policy, we know little about how it has been understood and interpreted by the people it affects. Methods: We assessed awareness and perceived fairness of the prioritization system for ART among a population-based sample of young women (n = 1440) and their partners (n = 574) in southern Malawi. We use a card-sort technique to elicit understandings of who gets ART under Option B+ and who should be prioritized, and we compare perceptions to actual ART policy using sequence analysis and optimal matching. We then use ordered logistic regression to identify the factors associated with policy awareness. Results: In 2015, only 30.7% of women and 21.1% of male partners understood how ART was being distributed. There was widespread confusion around whether otherwise healthy HIV-positive pregnant women could access ART under Option B + . Nonetheless, more young adults thought that the fairest policy should prioritize such women than believed the actual policy did. Women who were older, more educated or had recently engaged with the health system through antenatal care or ART had more accurate understandings of Option B + . Among men, policy awareness was lower, and was patterned only by education. Conclusions: Although most respondents were unaware that Option B+ afforded ART access to healthy-pregnant women, Malawians support the prioritization of pregnant women. Countries adopting Option B+ or other new ART policies such as universal test-and-treat should communicate the policies and their rationales to the public – such transparency would be more consistent with a fair and ethical process and could additionally serve to clarify confusion and enhance retention.​​ Taylor & Francis 2017-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5467611/ /pubmed/28362070 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21467 Text en © 2017 Yeatman S and Trinitapoli J; license International AIDS Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yeatman, Sara
Trinitapoli, Jenny
Awareness and perceived fairness of option B+ in Malawi: a population-level perspective
title Awareness and perceived fairness of option B+ in Malawi: a population-level perspective
title_full Awareness and perceived fairness of option B+ in Malawi: a population-level perspective
title_fullStr Awareness and perceived fairness of option B+ in Malawi: a population-level perspective
title_full_unstemmed Awareness and perceived fairness of option B+ in Malawi: a population-level perspective
title_short Awareness and perceived fairness of option B+ in Malawi: a population-level perspective
title_sort awareness and perceived fairness of option b+ in malawi: a population-level perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5467611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28362070
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.20.1.21467
work_keys_str_mv AT yeatmansara awarenessandperceivedfairnessofoptionbinmalawiapopulationlevelperspective
AT trinitapolijenny awarenessandperceivedfairnessofoptionbinmalawiapopulationlevelperspective