Cargando…

Certification of clinical and translational researchers: An ill-conceived notion

The National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) has instituted a new multiple choice examination in order to “certify” clinical and translational investigators. As experienced research educators, we argue that this certification process is unnecessary, values knowledge over competency, may be counter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marantz, Paul R., Selker, Harry P., Meagher, Emma A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5467637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28649447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2016.16
Descripción
Sumario:The National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) has instituted a new multiple choice examination in order to “certify” clinical and translational investigators. As experienced research educators, we argue that this certification process is unnecessary, values knowledge over competency, may be counter-productive, and is unlikely to achieve any worthwhile outcome. We lay out these arguments in the hope of stimulating a robust discussion among leaders, faculty, and learners engaged in clinical research education and training.